Home / Companies / United Parcel Service, Inc. / 8 May 2025
United Parcel Service, Inc.: meeting of 8 May 2025
Votes reported on Form N-PX, item by item
1,628 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the United Parcel Service, Inc. meeting of 8 May 2025. Their records fall into 7 items below, in ballot order: management items first, then proposals from security holders. Each bar shows how the reporting filers split; it is not the result of the meeting.
foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management
Items
DIRECTOR ELECTIONSIssuer
Director elections
12 nominees; 78.2% of reported votes for; 218 filers withheld from or voted against at least one nominee.
10,793 vote records from 352 filers. 7 of the 349 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 3 filers reported this item without a management mark.
SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESIssuer
Advisory vote on executive pay (say-on-pay)
2,545 vote records from 1,601 filers. 137 of the 1,559 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 42 filers reported this item without a management mark.
AUDIT-RELATEDIssuer
Audit-related items (auditor ratification)
898 vote records from 348 filers. 10 of the 345 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 3 filers reported this item without a management mark.
COMPENSATIONIssuer
COMPENSATION: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
42 vote records from 18 filers. 2 of the 18 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
ENVIRONMENT OR CLIMATESecurity holder
To prepare a report on the risks arising from voluntary carbon-reduction commitments.
870 vote records from 329 filers. 13 of the 327 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 2 filers reported this item without a management mark.
SHAREHOLDER RIGHTS AND DEFENSESSecurity holder
To take steps to reduce the voting power of UPS class A stock from 10 votes per share to one vote per share.
881 vote records from 332 filers. 298 of the 329 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 3 filers reported this item without a management mark.
Several categoriesSecurity holder
Shareholder proposals (not separable from the filings)
Filers described these proposals in wordings that could not be matched to one another, so they are shown together.
42 vote records from 14 filers. 4 of the 14 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
How the largest families voted
| Family | 1. Directors | 2. Say-on-pay | 3. Auditor | 5. Proposal | 6. Proposal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vanguard | For | For | For | Against | For * |
| BlackRock and iShares | For | For | For | Against | Against |
| Fidelity | For | For | For | Against | For * |
| Dimensional | For | For | For | Against | For * |
| State Street and SPDR | For | For | For | Against | For * |
| American Century | For | For | For | Against | For * |
| Franklin Templeton | For | For | For | Against | For * |
| Invesco | For | For | For | Against | For * |
| Equitable | Against * | For | For | Against | For * |
| Charles Schwab | For | For | For | Against | For * |
| Nuveen and TIAA | For | Against * | For | Against | For * |
| ProShares and ProFunds | For | For | For | Against | For * |
| John Hancock and Manulife | For | For | For | Against | For * |
| Morgan Stanley, Eaton Vance and Calvert | For | For | For | Against | For * |
| J.P. Morgan | For | For | For | Against | For * |
| Goldman Sachs | For | For | For | Against | For * |
| WisdomTree | For | For | For | Against | For * |
| PGIM and Prudential | For | For | For | Against | For * |
| Jackson National funds | For | For | For | Against | For * |
| Northern Trust and FlexShares | For | For | For | Against | For * |
| SEI | For | For | For | Against | For * |
| T. Rowe Price | For | For | For | Against | For * |
| Thrivent | For | For | For | Against | Against |
| Lincoln Financial | For | For | For | Against | For * |
| Voya | For | For | For | Against | For * |
| First Trust | For | For | For | Against | For * |
| Russell Investments | For | For | For | Against | For * |
| Nationwide | For | For | For | Against | For * |
| Victory Capital | For | For | For | Against | For * |
| Brighthouse Funds | For | For | For | Against | For * |
| Guggenheim and Rydex | For | For | For | Against | For * |
| Columbia Threadneedle | For | For | For | Against | For * |
| BNY Mellon | For | For | For | Against | For * |
| Principal | For | For | For | Against | For * |
| Capital Group and American Funds | For | For | For | Against | For * |
| Pacific Life funds | For | For | For | Against | Against |
| Global X | For | For | For | No report | No report |
| MFS | For | For | For | Against | For * |
| Transamerica | For | For | For | Against | For * |
| Federated Hermes | For | For | For | Against | For * |
| AllianceBernstein | Against * | For | For | Against | For * |
| Hartford Funds | For | For | For | Against | For * |
| DWS | For | For | For | Against | For * |
| PIMCO | For | For | For | Against | For * |
| Allspring | For | For | For | Against | For * |
| MassMutual | For | For | For | Against | For * |
| Virtus | For | For | For | Against | For * |
| VanEck | For | For | For | Against | For * |
| Macquarie and Delaware Funds | Split or no vote | For | For | Against | For * |
| Janus Henderson | For | For | For | Against | For * |
| Neuberger Berman | No report | For | No report | No report | No report |
| American Beacon | For | Against * | For | Against | For * |
| Natixis and Loomis Sayles | For | For | For | Against | For * |
| Lord Abbett | No report | For | No report | No report | No report |
| Baird | No report | For | No report | No report | No report |
| Artisan Partners | For | For | For | No report | No report |
* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.
Questions
How did large funds vote at the United Parcel Service, Inc. meeting?
1,628 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the meeting of 8 May 2025. On say-on-pay, 137 of 1,559 voted against management (8.8%). 2 proposals from security holders could be told apart in the filings. The family table lists each of the largest families item by item.
Is this the meeting result?
No. These are the votes of funds and managers that file Form N-PX, counted by filer and by the shares they reported. The certified result, which includes every shareholder, is reported by United Parcel Service, Inc. on Form 8-K.
Why are director elections shown as counts only?
Director records name the nominee. This site does not publish pages or rows about individuals, so for director elections it keeps the number of nominees and the split of votes and discards the wording.
Every meeting on file for United Parcel Service, Inc.
Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings listing United Parcel Service, Inc. with a meeting date within three days of 8 May 2025. Proposal titles are the most common wording among filers and are replaced by the SEC category where a wording could name a person. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 23 Sep 2026.