Vote Scores

Home / Companies / Xcel Energy Inc. / 20 May 2026

Meeting · year to 30 June 20261,253 filers reporting

Xcel Energy Inc.: meeting of 20 May 2026

Votes reported on Form N-PX, item by item

1,253 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the Xcel Energy Inc. meeting of 20 May 2026. Their records fall into 5 items below, in ballot order: management items first, then proposals from security holders. Each bar shows how the reporting filers split; it is not the result of the meeting.

foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management

Items

1

DIRECTOR ELECTIONSIssuer

Director elections

10 nominees; 96.0% of reported votes for; 31 filers withheld from or voted against at least one nominee.

8,845 vote records from 331 filers. 1 of the 330 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 1 filer reported this item without a management mark.

99.7% for0.0% against0.3% other0.3% against management331 filers
2

SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESIssuer

Advisory vote on executive pay (say-on-pay)

2,016 vote records from 1,245 filers. 232 of the 1,205 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 40 filers reported this item without a management mark.

77.1% for19.2% against3.7% other19.3% against management1,245 filers92.8% for7.2% against0.0% other6.8% against management655,369,308 reported shares
3

AUDIT-RELATEDIssuer

Audit-related items (auditor ratification)

886 vote records from 331 filers. 5 of the 330 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 1 filer reported this item without a management mark.

98.2% for1.5% against0.3% other1.5% against management331 filers99.8% for0.2% against0.0% other0.1% against management275,309,613 reported shares
4

COMPENSATIONIssuer

COMPENSATION: management items

Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.

30 vote records from 17 filers. 1 of the 17 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.

94.1% for5.9% against5.9% against management17 filers85.4% for14.6% against0.0% other14.6% against management1,209,342 reported shares, counted once per item in this group
5

Several categoriesSecurity holder

Shareholder proposals (not separable from the filings)

Filers described these proposals in wordings that could not be matched to one another, so they are shown together.

1 vote records from 1 filers. 0 of the 1 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.

100.0% for0.0% against0.0% against management1 filers100.0% for0.0% against0.0% against management355 reported shares, counted once per item in this group

How the largest families voted

Family1. Directors2. Say-on-pay3. Auditor
VanguardForForFor
BlackRock and iSharesForForFor
FidelityForForFor
DimensionalForAgainst *For
State Street and SPDRForForFor
American CenturyForForFor
Franklin TempletonForForFor
InvescoForForFor
EquitableForForFor
Charles SchwabForForFor
Nuveen and TIAAForForFor
ProShares and ProFundsForForFor
John Hancock and ManulifeForForFor
Morgan Stanley, Eaton Vance and CalvertForForFor
J.P. MorganForForFor
Goldman SachsForForFor
WisdomTreeForForFor
PGIM and PrudentialForAgainst *For
Jackson National fundsForForFor
Northern Trust and FlexSharesForForFor
SEIForAgainst *For
T. Rowe PriceForForFor
ThriventForForFor
Lincoln FinancialForForFor
VoyaForForFor
First TrustForForFor
Russell InvestmentsForAgainst *For
NationwideForForFor
Victory CapitalForForFor
Brighthouse FundsForForFor
Guggenheim and RydexForForFor
Columbia ThreadneedleForForFor
BNY MellonForForFor
PrincipalForForFor
Capital Group and American FundsForForFor
Pacific Life fundsForForFor
Global XForAgainst *For
MFSForForFor
TransamericaForForFor
Federated HermesForForFor
AllianceBernsteinForForFor
Hartford FundsForAgainst *Against *
DWSForForFor
PIMCOForForFor
AllspringForForFor
MassMutualForForFor
Harbor FundsForForFor
VirtusForForFor
Macquarie and Delaware FundsForForFor
Janus HendersonForForFor
Neuberger BermanNo reportAgainst *No report
American BeaconForAgainst *For
Natixis and Loomis SaylesNo reportForNo report
Cohen & SteersForForFor
BairdNo reportForNo report

* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.

Questions

How did large funds vote at the Xcel Energy Inc. meeting?

1,253 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the meeting of 20 May 2026. On say-on-pay, 232 of 1,205 voted against management (19.3%). The family table lists each of the largest families item by item.

Is this the meeting result?

No. These are the votes of funds and managers that file Form N-PX, counted by filer and by the shares they reported. The certified result, which includes every shareholder, is reported by Xcel Energy Inc. on Form 8-K.

Why are director elections shown as counts only?

Director records name the nominee. This site does not publish pages or rows about individuals, so for director elections it keeps the number of nominees and the split of votes and discards the wording.

Every meeting on file for Xcel Energy Inc.

Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings listing Xcel Energy Inc. with a meeting date within three days of 20 May 2026. Proposal titles are the most common wording among filers and are replaced by the SEC category where a wording could name a person. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 23 Sep 2026.