Home / Companies / XPLR Infrastructure, LP / 22 Apr 2024
XPLR Infrastructure, LP: meeting of 22 Apr 2024
Votes reported on Form N-PX, item by item
380 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the XPLR Infrastructure, LP meeting of 22 Apr 2024. Their records fall into 5 items below, in ballot order: management items first, then proposals from security holders. Each bar shows how the reporting filers split; it is not the result of the meeting.
foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management
Items
DIRECTOR ELECTIONSIssuer
Director elections
4 nominees; 90.7% of reported votes for; 19 filers withheld from or voted against at least one nominee.
454 vote records from 87 filers. 3 of the 86 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 1 filer reported this item without a management mark.
One filer reported a share count too large to be the holding described. That figure is left out of the share split below; the count of filers includes it. How that is decided
SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESIssuer
Advisory vote on executive pay (say-on-pay)
433 vote records from 361 filers. 146 of the 342 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 19 filers reported this item without a management mark.
2 filers reported share counts too large to be the holding described. Those figures are left out of the share split below; the counts of filers include them. How that is decided
AUDIT-RELATEDIssuer
Audit-related items (auditor ratification)
112 vote records from 85 filers. 1 of the 84 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 1 filer reported this item without a management mark.
One filer reported a share count too large to be the holding described. That figure is left out of the share split below; the count of filers includes it. How that is decided
COMPENSATIONIssuer
COMPENSATION: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
130 vote records from 91 filers. 1 of the 89 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 2 filers reported this item without a management mark.
One filer reported a share count too large to be the holding described. That figure is left out of the share split below; the count of filers includes it. How that is decided
Several categoriesSecurity holder
Shareholder proposals (not separable from the filings)
Filers described these proposals in wordings that could not be matched to one another, so they are shown together.
3 vote records from 1 filers. 0 of the 1 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
How the largest families voted
| Family | 1. Directors | 2. Say-on-pay | 3. Auditor |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vanguard | Against * | For | For |
| BlackRock and iShares | For | For | For |
| Fidelity | For | For | For |
| State Street and SPDR | No report | For | No report |
| American Century | For | Against * | For |
| Franklin Templeton | For | Against * | For |
| Invesco | For | For | For |
| Nuveen and TIAA | No report | Against * | No report |
| John Hancock and Manulife | For | Against * | For |
| Morgan Stanley, Eaton Vance and Calvert | Against * | Against * | For |
| J.P. Morgan | For | For | For |
| Goldman Sachs | For | Against * | For |
| Northern Trust and FlexShares | No report | Against * | No report |
| SEI | No report | For | No report |
| Thrivent | For | Against * | For |
| First Trust | For | For | For |
| Russell Investments | No report | For | No report |
| Nationwide | For | For | For |
| Guggenheim and Rydex | For | Against * | For |
| Columbia Threadneedle | No report | For | No report |
| BNY Mellon | For | For | For |
| Principal | For | Against * | For |
| Global X | For | For | For |
| AllianceBernstein | For | Against * | For |
| VanEck | For | For | For |
| Janus Henderson | No report | Against * | No report |
| Neuberger Berman | For | For | For |
| Cohen & Steers | No report | Against * | No report |
| Baird | No report | Against * | No report |
* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.
Questions
How did large funds vote at the XPLR Infrastructure, LP meeting?
380 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the meeting of 22 Apr 2024. On say-on-pay, 146 of 342 voted against management (42.7%). The family table lists each of the largest families item by item.
Is this the meeting result?
No. These are the votes of funds and managers that file Form N-PX, counted by filer and by the shares they reported. The certified result, which includes every shareholder, is reported by XPLR Infrastructure, LP on Form 8-K.
Why are director elections shown as counts only?
Director records name the nominee. This site does not publish pages or rows about individuals, so for director elections it keeps the number of nominees and the split of votes and discards the wording.
Every meeting on file for XPLR Infrastructure, LP
Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings listing XPLR Infrastructure, LP with a meeting date within three days of 22 Apr 2024. Proposal titles are the most common wording among filers and are replaced by the SEC category where a wording could name a person. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 23 Sep 2026.