Home / Companies / Zurn Elkay Water Solutions Corporation / 1 May 2025
Zurn Elkay Water Solutions Corporation: meeting of 1 May 2025
Votes reported on Form N-PX, item by item
515 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the Zurn Elkay Water Solutions Corporation meeting of 1 May 2025. Their records fall into 4 items below, in ballot order: management items first, then proposals from security holders. Each bar shows how the reporting filers split; it is not the result of the meeting.
foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management
Items
DIRECTOR ELECTIONSIssuer
Director elections
4 nominees; 94.0% of reported votes for; 36 filers withheld from or voted against at least one nominee.
1,290 vote records from 168 filers. 2 of the 168 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESIssuer
Advisory vote on executive pay (say-on-pay)
726 vote records from 510 filers. 313 of the 492 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 18 filers reported this item without a management mark.
AUDIT-RELATEDIssuer
Audit-related items (auditor ratification)
324 vote records from 168 filers. 4 of the 168 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
COMPENSATIONIssuer
COMPENSATION: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
331 vote records from 171 filers. 9 of the 171 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
How the largest families voted
| Family | 1. Directors | 2. Say-on-pay | 3. Auditor |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vanguard | For | For | For |
| BlackRock and iShares | For | For | For |
| Fidelity | For | For | For |
| Dimensional | For | Against * | For |
| State Street and SPDR | For | For | For |
| American Century | For | Against * | For |
| Franklin Templeton | No report | Against * | No report |
| Invesco | For | Against * | For |
| Equitable | For | For | For |
| Charles Schwab | For | Against * | For |
| Nuveen and TIAA | For | Against * | For |
| ProShares and ProFunds | For | Against * | For |
| John Hancock and Manulife | For | Against * | For |
| Morgan Stanley, Eaton Vance and Calvert | For | Against * | For |
| J.P. Morgan | For | For | For |
| Goldman Sachs | For | For | For |
| WisdomTree | For | For | For |
| PGIM and Prudential | For | For | For |
| Jackson National funds | For | Against * | For |
| Northern Trust and FlexShares | For | Against * | For |
| SEI | For | Against * | For |
| T. Rowe Price | Abstain or withhold * | For | For |
| Thrivent | For | Against * | For |
| Lincoln Financial | For | Against | For |
| Voya | For | Against * | For |
| First Trust | For | Against * | For |
| Russell Investments | For | Against * | For |
| Nationwide | For | For | For |
| Victory Capital | For | Against * | For |
| Brighthouse Funds | For | Against * | For |
| Guggenheim and Rydex | For | Against * | For |
| Columbia Threadneedle | For | Against * | For |
| BNY Mellon | For | For | For |
| Principal | For | For | For |
| Pacific Life funds | For | For | For |
| Global X | For | Against * | For |
| MFS | For | Against * | For |
| Federated Hermes | No report | Against * | No report |
| AllianceBernstein | No report | Against * | No report |
| Hartford Funds | For | For | For |
| DWS | For | Against * | For |
| PIMCO | No report | Against * | No report |
| Allspring | For | Against * | For |
| MassMutual | For | Against * | For |
| Harbor Funds | For | For | For |
| Virtus | For | For | For |
| Macquarie and Delaware Funds | For | Against * | For |
| Janus Henderson | For | For | For |
| Neuberger Berman | For | Against * | For |
| American Beacon | For | Against * | For |
| Natixis and Loomis Sayles | No report | Against * | No report |
| Lord Abbett | No report | For | No report |
| Baird | No report | Against * | No report |
* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.
Questions
How did large funds vote at the Zurn Elkay Water Solutions Corporation meeting?
515 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the meeting of 1 May 2025. On say-on-pay, 313 of 492 voted against management (63.6%). The family table lists each of the largest families item by item.
Is this the meeting result?
No. These are the votes of funds and managers that file Form N-PX, counted by filer and by the shares they reported. The certified result, which includes every shareholder, is reported by Zurn Elkay Water Solutions Corporation on Form 8-K.
Why are director elections shown as counts only?
Director records name the nominee. This site does not publish pages or rows about individuals, so for director elections it keeps the number of nominees and the split of votes and discards the wording.
Every meeting on file for Zurn Elkay Water Solutions Corporation
Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings listing Zurn Elkay Water Solutions Corporation with a meeting date within three days of 1 May 2025. Proposal titles are the most common wording among filers and are replaced by the SEC category where a wording could name a person. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 23 Sep 2026.