Home / Companies / Amplify Energy Corp. / 15 May 2024
Amplify Energy Corp.: meeting of 15 May 2024
Votes reported on Form N-PX, item by item
209 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the Amplify Energy Corp. meeting of 15 May 2024. Their records fall into 5 items below, in ballot order: management items first, then proposals from security holders. Each bar shows how the reporting filers split; it is not the result of the meeting.
foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management
Items
DIRECTOR ELECTIONSIssuer
Director elections
7 nominees; 97.2% of reported votes for; 3 filers withheld from or voted against at least one nominee.
959 vote records from 80 filers. 2 of the 80 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESIssuer
Advisory vote on executive pay (say-on-pay)
291 vote records from 208 filers. 4 of the 202 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 6 filers reported this item without a management mark.
AUDIT-RELATEDIssuer
Audit-related items (auditor ratification)
137 vote records from 80 filers. 1 of the 80 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
COMPENSATIONIssuer
COMPENSATION: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
138 vote records from 81 filers. 8 of the 81 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
EXTRAORDINARY TRANSACTIONSSecurity holder
To vote on a stockholder proposal requesting the Company to take the necessary steps to achieve a sale,...
134 vote records from 77 filers. 1 of the 77 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
How the largest families voted
| Family | 1. Directors | 2. Say-on-pay | 3. Auditor | 5. Proposal |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vanguard | For | For | For | Against |
| BlackRock and iShares | For | For | For | Against |
| Fidelity | For | For | For | Against |
| Dimensional | For | For | For | Against |
| State Street and SPDR | For | For | For | Against |
| American Century | For | For | For | Against |
| Franklin Templeton | For | For | For | Against |
| Invesco | For | For | For | Against |
| Equitable | For | For | For | Against |
| Charles Schwab | For | For | For | Against |
| Nuveen and TIAA | For | For | For | Against |
| ProShares and ProFunds | For | For | For | Against |
| John Hancock and Manulife | For | For | For | Against |
| Morgan Stanley, Eaton Vance and Calvert | For | For | For | Against |
| J.P. Morgan | No report | For | No report | No report |
| Goldman Sachs | For | For | For | Against |
| WisdomTree | For | For | For | Against |
| PGIM and Prudential | For | For | For | Against |
| Jackson National funds | For | For | For | Against |
| Northern Trust and FlexShares | For | For | For | Against |
| SEI | For | For | For | Against |
| T. Rowe Price | For | For | For | Against |
| Lincoln Financial | For | For | For | Against |
| Voya | For | For | For | Against |
| First Trust | For | For | For | Against |
| Nationwide | For | For | For | Against |
| Victory Capital | For | For | For | Against |
| Brighthouse Funds | For | For | For | Against |
| Guggenheim and Rydex | For | For | For | Against |
| Columbia Threadneedle | No report | For | No report | No report |
| BNY Mellon | No report | For | No report | No report |
| Principal | For | For | For | Against |
| Pacific Life funds | For | For | For | Against |
| Global X | For | For | For | No report |
| Federated Hermes | For | For | For | Against |
| AllianceBernstein | No report | For | No report | No report |
| DWS | For | For | For | Against |
| Janus Henderson | No report | For | No report | No report |
| Neuberger Berman | No report | For | No report | No report |
| Natixis and Loomis Sayles | No report | For | No report | No report |
* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.
Questions
How did large funds vote at the Amplify Energy Corp. meeting?
209 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the meeting of 15 May 2024. On say-on-pay, 4 of 202 voted against management (2.0%). One proposal from security holders could be told apart in the filings. The family table lists each of the largest families item by item.
Is this the meeting result?
No. These are the votes of funds and managers that file Form N-PX, counted by filer and by the shares they reported. The certified result, which includes every shareholder, is reported by Amplify Energy Corp. on Form 8-K.
Why are director elections shown as counts only?
Director records name the nominee. This site does not publish pages or rows about individuals, so for director elections it keeps the number of nominees and the split of votes and discards the wording.
Every meeting on file for Amplify Energy Corp.
Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings listing Amplify Energy Corp. with a meeting date within three days of 15 May 2024. Proposal titles are the most common wording among filers and are replaced by the SEC category where a wording could name a person. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 23 Sep 2026.