Home / Companies / AppLovin Corporation / 3 Jun 2026
AppLovin Corporation: meeting of 3 Jun 2026
Votes reported on Form N-PX, item by item
1,302 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the AppLovin Corporation meeting of 3 Jun 2026. Their records fall into 6 items below, in ballot order: management items first, then proposals from security holders. Each bar shows how the reporting filers split; it is not the result of the meeting.
foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management
Items
DIRECTOR ELECTIONSIssuer
Director elections
9 nominees; 72.5% of reported votes for; 238 filers withheld from or voted against at least one nominee.
9,898 vote records from 379 filers. 114 of the 374 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 5 filers reported this item without a management mark.
SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESIssuer
Advisory vote on executive pay (say-on-pay)
2,263 vote records from 1,289 filers. 476 of the 1,243 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 46 filers reported this item without a management mark.
AUDIT-RELATEDIssuer
Audit-related items (auditor ratification)
1,093 vote records from 379 filers. 2 of the 374 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 5 filers reported this item without a management mark.
CORPORATE GOVERNANCEIssuer
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
1,022 vote records from 360 filers. 215 of the 356 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 4 filers reported this item without a management mark.
CORPORATE GOVERNANCESecurity holder
Stockholder proposal regarding disclosure of voting results by class of shares
1,083 vote records from 374 filers. 266 of the 369 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 5 filers reported this item without a management mark.
Several categoriesSecurity holder
Shareholder proposals (not separable from the filings)
Filers described these proposals in wordings that could not be matched to one another, so they are shown together.
3 vote records from 3 filers. 2 of the 3 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
How the largest families voted
| Family | 1. Directors | 2. Say-on-pay | 3. Auditor | 5. Proposal |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vanguard | For | For | For | Against |
| BlackRock and iShares | For | For | For | Against |
| Fidelity | For | For | For | For * |
| Dimensional | Abstain or withhold * | Against * | For | For * |
| State Street and SPDR | For | Against * | For | For * |
| American Century | For | For | For | For * |
| Franklin Templeton | For | Against * | For | For * |
| Invesco | For | Against * | For | For * |
| Equitable | For | For | For | For * |
| Charles Schwab | For | For | For | For * |
| Nuveen and TIAA | For | For | For | For * |
| ProShares and ProFunds | Abstain or withhold * | Against * | For | For * |
| John Hancock and Manulife | Abstain or withhold * | Against * | For | For * |
| Morgan Stanley, Eaton Vance and Calvert | For | For | For | For * |
| J.P. Morgan | For | For | For | Against |
| Goldman Sachs | For | For | For | For * |
| WisdomTree | For | For | For | Against |
| PGIM and Prudential | For | For | For | For * |
| Jackson National funds | For | For | For | Against |
| Northern Trust and FlexShares | For | Against * | For | For * |
| SEI | For | For | For | For * |
| T. Rowe Price | Abstain or withhold * | For | For | Against |
| Thrivent | Abstain or withhold * | Against * | For | For * |
| Lincoln Financial | For | Against | For | For * |
| Voya | Abstain or withhold * | For | For | For * |
| First Trust | For | Against * | For | For * |
| Russell Investments | For | For | For | For * |
| Nationwide | For | For | For | Against |
| Victory Capital | Abstain or withhold * | Against * | For | For * |
| Brighthouse Funds | For | For | For | Against * |
| Guggenheim and Rydex | Abstain or withhold * | Against * | For | For * |
| Columbia Threadneedle | For | Against * | For | Against |
| BNY Mellon | For | For | For | Against |
| Principal | Abstain or withhold * | Against * | For | For * |
| Capital Group and American Funds | For | Against * | For | For * |
| Pacific Life funds | For | For | For | Against |
| Global X | For | For | For | For * |
| MFS | For | For | For | For * |
| Transamerica | For | For | For | For * |
| Federated Hermes | For | For | For | For * |
| AllianceBernstein | Abstain or withhold * | For | For | For * |
| Hartford Funds | For | For | For | Against |
| DWS | For | Against * | For | For * |
| PIMCO | Abstain or withhold * | Against * | For | For * |
| Allspring | Abstain or withhold * | Against * | For | For * |
| MassMutual | For | For | For | Against |
| Harbor Funds | For | For | For | For * |
| Virtus | Abstain or withhold * | Against * | For | For * |
| VanEck | For | For | For | For * |
| Macquarie and Delaware Funds | No report | Against * | No report | No report |
| Janus Henderson | For | For | For | For * |
| Neuberger Berman | No report | For | No report | No report |
| Natixis and Loomis Sayles | Abstain or withhold * | For | For | For * |
| Lord Abbett | Abstain or withhold * | For | For | For * |
| Baird | No report | Against * | No report | No report |
| Artisan Partners | No report | Against * | No report | No report |
* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.
Questions
How did large funds vote at the AppLovin Corporation meeting?
1,302 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the meeting of 3 Jun 2026. On say-on-pay, 476 of 1,243 voted against management (38.3%). One proposal from security holders could be told apart in the filings. The family table lists each of the largest families item by item.
Is this the meeting result?
No. These are the votes of funds and managers that file Form N-PX, counted by filer and by the shares they reported. The certified result, which includes every shareholder, is reported by AppLovin Corporation on Form 8-K.
Why are director elections shown as counts only?
Director records name the nominee. This site does not publish pages or rows about individuals, so for director elections it keeps the number of nominees and the split of votes and discards the wording.
Every meeting on file for AppLovin Corporation
Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings listing AppLovin Corporation with a meeting date within three days of 3 Jun 2026. Proposal titles are the most common wording among filers and are replaced by the SEC category where a wording could name a person. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 23 Sep 2026.