Vote Scores

Home / Companies / Archer-Daniels-Midland Company / 8 May 2025

Meeting · year to 30 June 20251,084 filers reporting

Archer-Daniels-Midland Company: meeting of 8 May 2025

Votes reported on Form N-PX, item by item

1,084 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the Archer-Daniels-Midland Company meeting of 8 May 2025. Their records fall into 5 items below, in ballot order: management items first, then proposals from security holders. Each bar shows how the reporting filers split; it is not the result of the meeting.

foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management

Items

1

DIRECTOR ELECTIONSIssuer

Director elections

12 nominees; 95.1% of reported votes for; 37 filers withheld from or voted against at least one nominee.

8,102 vote records from 265 filers. 6 of the 264 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 1 filer reported this item without a management mark.

96.2% for1.5% against2.3% other2.3% against management265 filers
2

SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESIssuer

Advisory vote on executive pay (say-on-pay)

1,728 vote records from 1,074 filers. 110 of the 1,043 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 31 filers reported this item without a management mark.

86.2% for9.9% against3.9% other10.5% against management1,074 filers96.9% for3.0% against0.1% other2.4% against management411,178,239 reported shares
3

AUDIT-RELATEDIssuer

Audit-related items (auditor ratification)

677 vote records from 265 filers. 7 of the 264 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 1 filer reported this item without a management mark.

96.6% for2.3% against1.1% other2.7% against management265 filers99.8% for0.2% against0.0% other0.1% against management175,687,075 reported shares
4

CORPORATE GOVERNANCESecurity holder

Amend Right to Call Special Meeting

640 vote records from 255 filers. 19 of the 254 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 1 filer reported this item without a management mark.

5.9% for92.9% against1.2% other7.5% against management255 filers0.5% for99.5% against0.0% other0.6% against management174,699,239 reported shares
5

Several categoriesSecurity holder

Shareholder proposals (not separable from the filings)

Filers described these proposals in wordings that could not be matched to one another, so they are shown together.

2 vote records from 2 filers. 1 of the 2 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.

100.0% for0.0% against50.0% against management2 filers100.0% for0.0% against98.3% against management4,712 reported shares, counted once per item in this group

How the largest families voted

Family1. Directors2. Say-on-pay3. Auditor4. Proposal
VanguardForForForAgainst
BlackRock and iSharesForForForAgainst
FidelityForForForAgainst
DimensionalForForForAgainst
State Street and SPDRForForForAgainst
American CenturyForForForFor *
Franklin TempletonForForForAgainst
InvescoForForForAgainst
EquitableForForForAgainst
Charles SchwabForForForAgainst
Nuveen and TIAAForForForAgainst
ProShares and ProFundsForForForAgainst
John Hancock and ManulifeForForForAgainst
Morgan Stanley, Eaton Vance and CalvertForForForAgainst
J.P. MorganForAgainst *ForFor *
Goldman SachsForForForAgainst
WisdomTreeForAgainst *ForAgainst
PGIM and PrudentialForAgainst *ForAgainst
Jackson National fundsForForForAgainst
Northern Trust and FlexSharesForForForAgainst
SEIForForForAgainst
T. Rowe PriceForForForAgainst
ThriventForForForAgainst
Lincoln FinancialForForForAgainst
VoyaForForForAgainst
First TrustForForForAgainst
Russell InvestmentsForForForAgainst
NationwideForForForAgainst
Victory CapitalForForForAgainst
Brighthouse FundsForForForAgainst *
Guggenheim and RydexForForForAgainst
Columbia ThreadneedleForForForAgainst
BNY MellonForAgainst *ForAgainst
PrincipalForForForAgainst
Capital Group and American FundsNo reportSplit or no voteNo reportNo report
Pacific Life fundsForForForAgainst
Global XForForForNo report
MFSForForForAgainst
TransamericaForForForAgainst
Federated HermesForForForAgainst
AllianceBernsteinSplit or no voteForForAgainst
Hartford FundsForForForAgainst
DWSForForForAgainst
PIMCOForForForAgainst
AllspringForForForAgainst
MassMutualForForForAgainst
Harbor FundsForForForAgainst
VanEckForForForAgainst
Macquarie and Delaware FundsNo reportForNo reportNo report
Janus HendersonNo reportForNo reportNo report
Neuberger BermanNo reportForNo reportNo report
Natixis and Loomis SaylesForForForAgainst
Harris Associates and OakmarkNo reportForNo reportNo report
BairdNo reportForNo reportNo report

* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.

Questions

How did large funds vote at the Archer-Daniels-Midland Company meeting?

1,084 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the meeting of 8 May 2025. On say-on-pay, 110 of 1,043 voted against management (10.5%). One proposal from security holders could be told apart in the filings. The family table lists each of the largest families item by item.

Is this the meeting result?

No. These are the votes of funds and managers that file Form N-PX, counted by filer and by the shares they reported. The certified result, which includes every shareholder, is reported by Archer-Daniels-Midland Company on Form 8-K.

Why are director elections shown as counts only?

Director records name the nominee. This site does not publish pages or rows about individuals, so for director elections it keeps the number of nominees and the split of votes and discards the wording.

Every meeting on file for Archer-Daniels-Midland Company

Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings listing Archer-Daniels-Midland Company with a meeting date within three days of 8 May 2025. Proposal titles are the most common wording among filers and are replaced by the SEC category where a wording could name a person. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 23 Sep 2026.