Vote Scores

Home / Companies / Aristocrat Leisure Limited / 19 Feb 2026

Meeting · year to 30 June 2026176 filers reporting

Aristocrat Leisure Limited: meeting of 19 Feb 2026

Votes reported on Form N-PX, item by item

176 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the Aristocrat Leisure Limited meeting of 19 Feb 2026. Their records fall into 7 items below, in ballot order: management items first, then proposals from security holders. Each bar shows how the reporting filers split; it is not the result of the meeting.

foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management

Items

1

DIRECTOR ELECTIONSIssuer

Director elections

2 nominees; 99.7% of reported votes for; one filer withheld from or voted against at least one nominee.

613 vote records from 155 filers. 1 of the 153 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 2 filers reported this item without a management mark.

98.7% for0.6% against0.6% other0.7% against management155 filers
2

SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESIssuer

Advisory vote on executive pay (say-on-pay)

113 vote records from 50 filers. 0 of the 45 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 5 filers reported this item without a management mark.

90.0% for0.0% against10.0% other0.0% against management50 filers100.0% for0.0% against0.0% other0.0% against management54,938,446 reported shares
3

SHAREHOLDER RIGHTS AND DEFENSESIssuer

SHAREHOLDER RIGHTS AND DEFENSES: management items

Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.

305 vote records from 154 filers. 0 of the 152 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 2 filers reported this item without a management mark.

99.4% for0.0% against0.6% other0.0% against management154 filers100.0% for0.0% against0.0% against management78,692,983 reported shares, counted once per item in this group
4

CAPITAL STRUCTUREIssuer

CAPITAL STRUCTURE: management items

Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.

27 vote records from 18 filers. 0 of the 17 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 1 filer reported this item without a management mark.

94.4% for0.0% against5.6% other0.0% against management18 filers100.0% for0.0% against0.0% against management2,871,631 reported shares, counted once per item in this group
5

COMPENSATIONIssuer

COMPENSATION: management items

Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.

831 vote records from 155 filers. 0 of the 153 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 2 filers reported this item without a management mark.

99.4% for0.0% against0.6% other0.0% against management155 filers100.0% for0.0% against0.0% against management216,176,574 reported shares, counted once per item in this group
6

OTHERIssuer

OTHER: management items

Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.

48 vote records from 15 filers. No filer marked a management recommendation, so no against-management figure is reported. 15 filers reported this item without a management mark.

0.0% for0.0% against100.0% other15 filers
7

Several categoriesSecurity holder

Shareholder proposals (not separable from the filings)

Filers described these proposals in wordings that could not be matched to one another, so they are shown together.

4 vote records from 1 filers. 0 of the 1 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.

100.0% for0.0% against0.0% against management1 filers100.0% for0.0% against0.0% against management606,860 reported shares, counted once per item in this group

How the largest families voted

Family1. Directors2. Say-on-pay
VanguardForNo report
BlackRock and iSharesForFor
FidelityForNo report
DimensionalForNo report
State Street and SPDRForNo report
American CenturyForNo report
Franklin TempletonForNo report
InvescoForNo report
EquitableForNo report
Charles SchwabForNo report
Nuveen and TIAAForNo report
John Hancock and ManulifeForFor
Morgan Stanley, Eaton Vance and CalvertForNo report
J.P. MorganForFor
Goldman SachsForNo report
WisdomTreeForNo report
PGIM and PrudentialForNo report
Jackson National fundsForFor
Northern Trust and FlexSharesForFor
SEIForNo report
T. Rowe PriceForNo report
ThriventForNo report
Lincoln FinancialForNo report
VoyaForNo report
First TrustForNo report
Russell InvestmentsForNo report
NationwideForNo report
Victory CapitalForNo report
Brighthouse FundsForNo report
Columbia ThreadneedleForNo report
BNY MellonForNo report
PrincipalForNo report
Capital Group and American FundsForNo report
Pacific Life fundsForNo report
Global XForNo report
MFSForNo report
TransamericaForNo report
AllianceBernsteinForNo report
PIMCOForNo report
AllspringForNo report
MassMutualNo reportFor
Harbor FundsForFor
VanEckForNo report

* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.

Questions

How did large funds vote at the Aristocrat Leisure Limited meeting?

176 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the meeting of 19 Feb 2026. On say-on-pay, 0 of 45 voted against management (0.0%). The family table lists each of the largest families item by item.

Is this the meeting result?

No. These are the votes of funds and managers that file Form N-PX, counted by filer and by the shares they reported. The certified result, which includes every shareholder, is reported by Aristocrat Leisure Limited on Form 8-K.

Why are director elections shown as counts only?

Director records name the nominee. This site does not publish pages or rows about individuals, so for director elections it keeps the number of nominees and the split of votes and discards the wording.

Every meeting on file for Aristocrat Leisure Limited

Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings listing Aristocrat Leisure Limited with a meeting date within three days of 19 Feb 2026. Proposal titles are the most common wording among filers and are replaced by the SEC category where a wording could name a person. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 23 Sep 2026.