Home / Companies / Asseco Poland SA / 18 Mar 2026
Asseco Poland SA: meeting of 18 Mar 2026
Votes reported on Form N-PX, item by item
47 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the Asseco Poland SA meeting of 18 Mar 2026. Their records fall into 8 items below, in ballot order: management items first, then proposals from security holders. Each bar shows how the reporting filers split; it is not the result of the meeting.
foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management
Items
SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESIssuer
Advisory vote on executive pay (say-on-pay)
17 vote records from 4 filers. 3 of the 4 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
CAPITAL STRUCTUREIssuer
CAPITAL STRUCTURE: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
60 vote records from 43 filers. 2 of the 41 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 2 filers reported this item without a management mark.
COMPENSATIONIssuer
COMPENSATION: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
120 vote records from 45 filers. 32 of the 43 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 2 filers reported this item without a management mark.
CORPORATE GOVERNANCEIssuer
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
219 vote records from 45 filers. 0 of the 43 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 2 filers reported this item without a management mark.
OTHERIssuer
OTHER: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
13 vote records from 5 filers. No filer marked a management recommendation, so no against-management figure is reported. 5 filers reported this item without a management mark.
CAPITAL STRUCTURESecurity holder
Approve Reduction in Share Capital via Cancellation of Repurchased Shares; Amend Statute Accordingly
57 vote records from 42 filers. 19 of the 38 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 4 filers reported this item without a management mark.
CAPITAL STRUCTURESecurity holder
Authorize Cancellation of Repurchased Shares
57 vote records from 42 filers. 19 of the 38 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 4 filers reported this item without a management mark.
Several categoriesSecurity holder
Shareholder proposals (not separable from the filings)
Filers described these proposals in wordings that could not be matched to one another, so they are shown together.
3 vote records from 2 filers. No filer marked a management recommendation, so no against-management figure is reported. 2 filers reported this item without a management mark.
How the largest families voted
| Family | 1. Say-on-pay | 6. Proposal | 7. Proposal |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vanguard | No report | Against | Against |
| BlackRock and iShares | Against * | No report | No report |
| Fidelity | No report | Against | Against |
| Dimensional | No report | Split or no vote | Split or no vote |
| State Street and SPDR | No report | For * | For * |
| American Century | No report | Against | Against |
| Franklin Templeton | No report | Against | Against |
| Invesco | No report | Against | Against |
| Equitable | No report | Against | Against |
| Charles Schwab | No report | Against | Against |
| Nuveen and TIAA | No report | For * | For * |
| Morgan Stanley, Eaton Vance and Calvert | No report | For * | For * |
| Goldman Sachs | No report | Against | Against |
| WisdomTree | No report | For * | For * |
| Northern Trust and FlexShares | No report | For * | For * |
| First Trust | No report | For * | For * |
| Victory Capital | No report | For * | For * |
| Brighthouse Funds | No report | For * | For * |
| BNY Mellon | No report | For * | For * |
| PIMCO | No report | For * | For * |
* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.
Questions
How did large funds vote at the Asseco Poland SA meeting?
47 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the meeting of 18 Mar 2026. On say-on-pay, 3 of 4 voted against management (75.0%). 2 proposals from security holders could be told apart in the filings. The family table lists each of the largest families item by item.
Is this the meeting result?
No. These are the votes of funds and managers that file Form N-PX, counted by filer and by the shares they reported. The certified result, which includes every shareholder, is reported by Asseco Poland SA on Form 8-K.
Why are director elections shown as counts only?
Director records name the nominee. This site does not publish pages or rows about individuals, so for director elections it keeps the number of nominees and the split of votes and discards the wording.
Every meeting on file for Asseco Poland SA
Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings listing Asseco Poland SA with a meeting date within three days of 18 Mar 2026. Proposal titles are the most common wording among filers and are replaced by the SEC category where a wording could name a person. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 23 Sep 2026.