Vote Scores

Home / Companies / Bandwidth Inc. / 28 May 2026

Meeting · year to 30 June 2026268 filers reporting

Bandwidth Inc.: meeting of 28 May 2026

Votes reported on Form N-PX, item by item

268 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the Bandwidth Inc. meeting of 28 May 2026. Their records fall into 4 items below, in ballot order: management items first, then proposals from security holders. Each bar shows how the reporting filers split; it is not the result of the meeting.

foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management

Items

1

DIRECTOR ELECTIONSIssuer

Director elections

2 nominees; 42.5% of reported votes for; 70 filers withheld from or voted against at least one nominee.

400 vote records from 103 filers. 43 of the 103 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.

36.9% for0.0% against63.1% other41.7% against management103 filers
2

SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESIssuer

Advisory vote on executive pay (say-on-pay)

416 vote records from 267 filers. 168 of the 259 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 8 filers reported this item without a management mark.

31.1% for65.5% against3.4% other64.9% against management267 filers50.5% for49.5% against48.6% against management21,905,043 reported shares
3

SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESIssuer

Frequency of the say-on-pay vote

one year: 242 filers; three years: 7 filers; for: 4 filers; not applicable: 2 filers; 1-year: 2 filers; takenoaction: 1 filer.

416 vote records from 265 filers. 7 of the 256 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 9 filers reported this item without a management mark.

1.5% for0.0% against98.5% other2.7% against management265 filers2.8% for0.1% against97.2% other13.4% against management21,792,862 reported shares
4

AUDIT-RELATEDIssuer

Audit-related items (auditor ratification)

200 vote records from 103 filers. 0 of the 103 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.

100.0% for0.0% against0.0% against management103 filers100.0% for0.0% against0.0% against management8,166,287 reported shares

How the largest families voted

Family1. Directors2. Say-on-pay3. Pay-vote frequency4. Auditor
VanguardForForSplit or no voteFor
BlackRock and iSharesForForSplit or no voteFor
FidelityAbstain or withhold *ForSplit or no voteFor
DimensionalAbstain or withhold *Against *Split or no vote *For
State Street and SPDRAbstain or withhold *ForSplit or no voteFor
American CenturyAbstain or withhold *Against *Split or no voteFor
Franklin TempletonAbstain or withhold *Against *Split or no voteFor
InvescoForAgainst *Split or no voteFor
EquitableForForSplit or no voteFor
Charles SchwabSplit or no voteAgainst *Split or no voteFor
Nuveen and TIAASplit or no voteForSplit or no voteFor
ProShares and ProFundsAbstain or withhold *Against *Split or no voteFor
John Hancock and ManulifeAbstain or withhold *Against *Split or no voteFor
Morgan Stanley, Eaton Vance and CalvertAbstain or withhold *Against *Split or no voteFor
J.P. MorganSplit or no voteAgainst *Split or no voteFor
Goldman SachsForForSplit or no voteFor
WisdomTreeAbstain or withhold *Against *Split or no voteFor
PGIM and PrudentialAbstain or withhold *Against *Split or no vote *For
Jackson National fundsAbstain or withhold *Against *Split or no vote *For
Northern Trust and FlexSharesForAgainst *Split or no voteFor
SEISplit or no voteAgainst *Split or no voteFor
T. Rowe PriceForAgainst *Split or no voteFor
Lincoln FinancialAbstain or withholdAgainstSplit or no voteFor
VoyaAbstain or withhold *Against *Split or no voteFor
Russell InvestmentsSplit or no voteAgainst *Split or no voteFor
NationwideAbstain or withhold *Against *Split or no voteFor
Victory CapitalAbstain or withhold *Against *Split or no voteFor
Brighthouse FundsAbstain or withholdAgainstForFor
Guggenheim and RydexAbstain or withhold *Against *Split or no voteFor
Columbia ThreadneedleForAgainst *Split or no voteFor
BNY MellonNo reportAgainst *Split or no voteNo report
PrincipalAbstain or withhold *Against *Split or no voteFor
Pacific Life fundsForForSplit or no voteFor
Global XSplit or no voteAgainst *Split or no voteFor
AllianceBernsteinAbstain or withhold *Against *Split or no voteFor
DWSAbstain or withhold *Against *Split or no voteFor
Harbor FundsForForSplit or no voteFor
Neuberger BermanNo reportAgainst *Split or no voteNo report
Natixis and Loomis SaylesNo reportAgainst *Split or no voteNo report

* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.

Questions

How did large funds vote at the Bandwidth Inc. meeting?

268 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the meeting of 28 May 2026. On say-on-pay, 168 of 259 voted against management (64.9%). The family table lists each of the largest families item by item.

Is this the meeting result?

No. These are the votes of funds and managers that file Form N-PX, counted by filer and by the shares they reported. The certified result, which includes every shareholder, is reported by Bandwidth Inc. on Form 8-K.

Why are director elections shown as counts only?

Director records name the nominee. This site does not publish pages or rows about individuals, so for director elections it keeps the number of nominees and the split of votes and discards the wording.

Every meeting on file for Bandwidth Inc.

Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings listing Bandwidth Inc. with a meeting date within three days of 28 May 2026. Proposal titles are the most common wording among filers and are replaced by the SEC category where a wording could name a person. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 23 Sep 2026.