Vote Scores

Home / Companies / Bandwidth Inc.

Company · votes reported on Form N-PXBAND · SEC company no. 1514416

Bandwidth Inc.

How funds and institutional managers reported voting their shares, year to 30 June 2026

Filers reporting
268year to 30 June 2026
Against management on pay
64.9%168 of 259 reporting filers
Same, by reported shares
48.6%shares reported on Form N-PX
Meetings on file
3across 3 seasons
31.1% for65.5% against3.4% other64.9% against management267 filers on say-on-pay

foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management

For the year to 30 June 2026, 268 funds and managers listed Bandwidth Inc. in their Form N-PX filings (one meeting).

On the advisory vote on executive pay, 168 of the 259 filers that reported a position voted against management (64.9%), 58.3 percentage points above the median company on this site (6.6%). By reported shares the figure is 48.6% (median 2.9%). These are shares of the filers reporting on Form N-PX, not of all votes cast at the meeting.

Among the largest fund families, 11 voted with management on pay and 28 voted against: Northern Trust and FlexShares, DWS, BNY Mellon, Dimensional, American Century, Principal, PGIM and Prudential and Victory Capital and others.

Meetings

Meeting dateSeasonFilers reportingItemsAgainst management on pay
28 May 2026year to 30 June 2026268464.9%
29 May 2025year to 30 June 2025273449.8%
23 May 2024year to 30 June 2024255355.3%

Meetings with 20 or more reporting filers have their own page with every item. Dates are as filers typed them; dates up to three days apart are treated as one meeting.

Say-on-pay: this company and the median

year to 30 June 2026Bandwidth Inc.Median company
Reporting filers voting against management64.9%6.6%
Reported shares voted against management48.6%2.9%

Among filers reporting on Form N-PX. The median is over 3,799 companies with a say-on-pay item reported by 20 or more filers.

How the largest families voted

Meeting of 28 May 2026: say-on-pay and each shareholder proposal that could be told apart.

FamilySay-on-pay
VanguardFor
BlackRock and iSharesFor
FidelityFor
DimensionalAgainst *
State Street and SPDRFor
American CenturyAgainst *
Franklin TempletonAgainst *
InvescoAgainst *
EquitableFor
Charles SchwabAgainst *
Nuveen and TIAAFor
ProShares and ProFundsAgainst *
John Hancock and ManulifeAgainst *
Morgan Stanley, Eaton Vance and CalvertAgainst *
J.P. MorganAgainst *
Goldman SachsFor
WisdomTreeAgainst *
PGIM and PrudentialAgainst *
Jackson National fundsAgainst *
Northern Trust and FlexSharesAgainst *
SEIAgainst *
T. Rowe PriceAgainst *
Lincoln FinancialAgainst
VoyaAgainst *
Russell InvestmentsAgainst *
NationwideAgainst *
Victory CapitalAgainst *
Brighthouse FundsAgainst
Guggenheim and RydexAgainst *
Columbia ThreadneedleAgainst *
BNY MellonAgainst *
PrincipalAgainst *
Pacific Life fundsFor
Global XAgainst *
AllianceBernsteinAgainst *
DWSAgainst *
Harbor FundsFor
Neuberger BermanAgainst *
Natixis and Loomis SaylesAgainst *

* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.

By season

SeasonFilers reportingAgainst management on pay, filersBy reported sharesSay-on-pay split
year to 30 June 202425555.3%54.2%
year to 30 June 202527549.8%41.6%
year to 30 June 202626864.9%48.6%

Category mix

Share of the vote records reported for this company, by the category filers chose.

CategoryVote recordsShare
SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTES1,62544.9%
DIRECTOR ELECTIONS1,19433.0%
AUDIT-RELATED59716.5%
COMPENSATION2035.6%

Questions

How did large funds vote at Bandwidth Inc.?

For the year to 30 June 2026, 259 Form N-PX filers reported a say-on-pay vote at Bandwidth Inc.; 168 voted against management (64.9%). The table on this page lists the position of each of the largest fund families on say-on-pay and on each shareholder proposal that could be told apart in the filings.

Were there shareholder proposals at Bandwidth Inc.?

No proposal from security holders was reported by enough filers to be shown for the year to 30 June 2026.

Is this the meeting result?

No. The figures are shares of the funds and managers that file Form N-PX, and of the shares they reported. Holders that do not file the form (individuals, most foreign investors, insiders) are not included, so the split here can differ widely from the certified result, which Bandwidth Inc. reports on Form 8-K.

Where does the data come from?

From Form N-PX filings on the SEC's EDGAR system, grouped by company. Filers type company names and meeting dates themselves; this site groups spellings of the same company and folds meeting dates up to three days apart. Data runs through 23 Sep 2026; the median compares 3,799 companies.

Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings that list Bandwidth Inc., grouped by company. The name is the most common spelling among filers; the ticker and SEC company number come from the SEC company tickers file, matched on the exact name. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 23 Sep 2026; page built 26 Sep 2026.