Home / Companies / Bandwidth Inc. / 29 May 2025
Bandwidth Inc.: meeting of 29 May 2025
Votes reported on Form N-PX, item by item
273 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the Bandwidth Inc. meeting of 29 May 2025. Their records fall into 4 items below, in ballot order: management items first, then proposals from security holders. Each bar shows how the reporting filers split; it is not the result of the meeting.
foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management
Items
DIRECTOR ELECTIONSIssuer
Director elections
2 nominees; 25.7% of reported votes for; 88 filers withheld from or voted against at least one nominee.
402 vote records from 101 filers. 62 of the 101 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESIssuer
Advisory vote on executive pay (say-on-pay)
404 vote records from 272 filers. 132 of the 265 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 7 filers reported this item without a management mark.
AUDIT-RELATEDIssuer
Audit-related items (auditor ratification)
201 vote records from 101 filers. 3 of the 101 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
COMPENSATIONIssuer
COMPENSATION: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
203 vote records from 103 filers. 99 of the 103 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
How the largest families voted
| Family | 1. Directors | 2. Say-on-pay | 3. Auditor |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vanguard | Abstain or withhold * | For | For |
| BlackRock and iShares | Split or no vote | For | For |
| Fidelity | For | For | For |
| Dimensional | Abstain or withhold * | Against * | For |
| State Street and SPDR | Abstain or withhold * | For | For |
| American Century | Abstain or withhold * | Against * | For |
| Franklin Templeton | Abstain or withhold * | Against * | For |
| Invesco | For | Against * | For |
| Equitable | Abstain or withhold * | For | For |
| Charles Schwab | Split or no vote | For | For |
| Nuveen and TIAA | Abstain or withhold * | For | For |
| ProShares and ProFunds | Abstain or withhold * | Against * | For |
| John Hancock and Manulife | Abstain or withhold * | Against * | For |
| Morgan Stanley, Eaton Vance and Calvert | Abstain or withhold * | Against * | For |
| J.P. Morgan | Split or no vote | For | For |
| Goldman Sachs | Abstain or withhold * | Against * | For |
| WisdomTree | Abstain or withhold * | Against * | For |
| PGIM and Prudential | Abstain or withhold * | For | For |
| Jackson National funds | Abstain or withhold * | Against * | For |
| Northern Trust and FlexShares | Split or no vote | Against * | For |
| SEI | Split or no vote | For | For |
| T. Rowe Price | For | Against * | For |
| Thrivent | Abstain or withhold * | Against * | For |
| Lincoln Financial | Abstain or withhold * | Against | For |
| Voya | Abstain or withhold * | Against * | For |
| First Trust | No report | For | No report |
| Russell Investments | Split or no vote | For | For |
| Nationwide | Abstain or withhold * | Against * | For |
| Victory Capital | Abstain or withhold * | Against * | For |
| Brighthouse Funds | Abstain or withhold * | Against * | For |
| Guggenheim and Rydex | Abstain or withhold * | Against * | For |
| Columbia Threadneedle | For | Against * | For |
| BNY Mellon | No report | Against * | No report |
| Principal | No report | Against * | No report |
| Pacific Life funds | Split or no vote | For | For |
| Global X | Split or no vote | For | For |
| AllianceBernstein | No report | Against * | No report |
| DWS | Abstain or withhold * | Against * | For |
| Allspring | Abstain or withhold * | Against * | For |
| Harbor Funds | For | For | For |
| Virtus | Abstain or withhold * | Against * | For |
| Neuberger Berman | No report | For | No report |
| Natixis and Loomis Sayles | No report | For | No report |
* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.
Questions
How did large funds vote at the Bandwidth Inc. meeting?
273 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the meeting of 29 May 2025. On say-on-pay, 132 of 265 voted against management (49.8%). The family table lists each of the largest families item by item.
Is this the meeting result?
No. These are the votes of funds and managers that file Form N-PX, counted by filer and by the shares they reported. The certified result, which includes every shareholder, is reported by Bandwidth Inc. on Form 8-K.
Why are director elections shown as counts only?
Director records name the nominee. This site does not publish pages or rows about individuals, so for director elections it keeps the number of nominees and the split of votes and discards the wording.
Every meeting on file for Bandwidth Inc.
Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings listing Bandwidth Inc. with a meeting date within three days of 29 May 2025. Proposal titles are the most common wording among filers and are replaced by the SEC category where a wording could name a person. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 23 Sep 2026.