Home / Companies / Block, Inc. / 16 Jun 2026
Block, Inc.: meeting of 16 Jun 2026
Votes reported on Form N-PX, item by item
1,121 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the Block, Inc. meeting of 16 Jun 2026. Their records fall into 6 items below, in ballot order: management items first, then proposals from security holders. Each bar shows how the reporting filers split; it is not the result of the meeting.
foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management
Items
DIRECTOR ELECTIONSIssuer
Director elections
4 nominees; 68.4% of reported votes for; 199 filers withheld from or voted against at least one nominee.
2,827 vote records from 264 filers. 36 of the 262 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 2 filers reported this item without a management mark.
SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESIssuer
Advisory vote on executive pay (say-on-pay)
1,796 vote records from 1,114 filers. 92 of the 1,073 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 41 filers reported this item without a management mark.
AUDIT-RELATEDIssuer
Audit-related items (auditor ratification)
713 vote records from 264 filers. 2 of the 262 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 2 filers reported this item without a management mark.
COMPENSATIONIssuer
COMPENSATION: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
32 vote records from 14 filers. 7 of the 14 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
CORPORATE GOVERNANCESecurity holder
Stockholder proposal regarding establishing a board-level technology committee
694 vote records from 257 filers. 21 of the 255 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 2 filers reported this item without a management mark.
Several categoriesSecurity holder
Shareholder proposals (not separable from the filings)
Filers described these proposals in wordings that could not be matched to one another, so they are shown together.
6 vote records from 4 filers. 3 of the 4 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
How the largest families voted
| Family | 1. Directors | 2. Say-on-pay | 3. Auditor | 5. Proposal |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vanguard | For | For | For | Against |
| BlackRock and iShares | For | For | For | Against |
| Fidelity | For | For | For | Against |
| Dimensional | Abstain or withhold * | For | For | Against |
| State Street and SPDR | For | For | For | Against |
| American Century | For | For | For | Against |
| Franklin Templeton | For | For | For | Against |
| Invesco | For | For | For | Against |
| Equitable | Abstain or withhold * | For | For | Against |
| Charles Schwab | For | For | For | Against |
| Nuveen and TIAA | For | For | For | Against |
| ProShares and ProFunds | For | For | For | Against |
| John Hancock and Manulife | Abstain or withhold * | For | For | Against |
| Morgan Stanley, Eaton Vance and Calvert | For | For | For | Against |
| J.P. Morgan | For | For | For | For * |
| Goldman Sachs | For | For | For | Against |
| WisdomTree | For | For | For | Against |
| PGIM and Prudential | Abstain or withhold * | For | For | Against |
| Jackson National funds | For | For | For | Against |
| Northern Trust and FlexShares | For | For | For | Against |
| SEI | For | For | For | Against |
| T. Rowe Price | Abstain or withhold * | For | For | Against |
| Thrivent | For | For | For | Against |
| Lincoln Financial | Abstain or withhold * | For | For | Against |
| Voya | Abstain or withhold * | For | For | Against |
| First Trust | For | For | For | Against |
| Russell Investments | Split or no vote | For | For | For * |
| Nationwide | For | For | For | Against |
| Victory Capital | For | For | For | Against |
| Brighthouse Funds | For | For | For | Against |
| Guggenheim and Rydex | For | For | For | Against |
| Columbia Threadneedle | For | For | For | Against |
| BNY Mellon | For | For | For | Against |
| Principal | Abstain or withhold * | For | For | Against |
| Capital Group and American Funds | For | For | For | Against |
| Pacific Life funds | For | For | For | Against |
| Global X | For | For | For | Against |
| MFS | Split or no vote | For | For | Against |
| Transamerica | For | For | For | Against |
| Federated Hermes | Abstain or withhold * | For | For | Against |
| AllianceBernstein | Abstain or withhold * | For | For | Against |
| Hartford Funds | For | For | For | Against |
| DWS | Split or no vote | Against * | For | For * |
| Allspring | Split or no vote | For | For | Against |
| MassMutual | For | For | For | Against |
| Harbor Funds | For | For | For | Against |
| VanEck | For | For | For | Against |
| Macquarie and Delaware Funds | No report | Against * | No report | No report |
| Janus Henderson | For | For | For | Against |
| Neuberger Berman | No report | For | No report | No report |
| American Beacon | For | For | For | Against |
| Natixis and Loomis Sayles | For | For | For | Against |
| Baird | No report | For | No report | No report |
| Artisan Partners | No report | For | No report | No report |
* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.
Questions
How did large funds vote at the Block, Inc. meeting?
1,121 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the meeting of 16 Jun 2026. On say-on-pay, 92 of 1,073 voted against management (8.6%). One proposal from security holders could be told apart in the filings. The family table lists each of the largest families item by item.
Is this the meeting result?
No. These are the votes of funds and managers that file Form N-PX, counted by filer and by the shares they reported. The certified result, which includes every shareholder, is reported by Block, Inc. on Form 8-K.
Why are director elections shown as counts only?
Director records name the nominee. This site does not publish pages or rows about individuals, so for director elections it keeps the number of nominees and the split of votes and discards the wording.
Every meeting on file for Block, Inc.
Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings listing Block, Inc. with a meeting date within three days of 16 Jun 2026. Proposal titles are the most common wording among filers and are replaced by the SEC category where a wording could name a person. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 23 Sep 2026.