Home / Companies / Bloom Energy Corporation / 21 May 2026
Bloom Energy Corporation: meeting of 21 May 2026
Votes reported on Form N-PX, item by item
962 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the Bloom Energy Corporation meeting of 21 May 2026. Their records fall into 6 items below, in ballot order: management items first, then proposals from security holders. Each bar shows how the reporting filers split; it is not the result of the meeting.
foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management
Items
DIRECTOR ELECTIONSIssuer
Director elections
4 nominees; 77.8% of reported votes for; 140 filers withheld from or voted against at least one nominee.
2,510 vote records from 285 filers. 15 of the 282 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 3 filers reported this item without a management mark.
SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESIssuer
Advisory vote on executive pay (say-on-pay)
1,461 vote records from 954 filers. 59 of the 916 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 38 filers reported this item without a management mark.
AUDIT-RELATEDIssuer
Audit-related items (auditor ratification)
619 vote records from 285 filers. 1 of the 282 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 3 filers reported this item without a management mark.
CAPITAL STRUCTUREIssuer
CAPITAL STRUCTURE: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
505 vote records from 239 filers. 0 of the 237 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 2 filers reported this item without a management mark.
CORPORATE GOVERNANCEIssuer
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
673 vote records from 269 filers. 18 of the 266 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 3 filers reported this item without a management mark.
Several categoriesSecurity holder
Shareholder proposals (not separable from the filings)
Filers described these proposals in wordings that could not be matched to one another, so they are shown together.
1 vote records from 1 filers. 0 of the 1 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
How the largest families voted
| Family | 1. Directors | 2. Say-on-pay | 3. Auditor |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vanguard | For | For | For |
| BlackRock and iShares | For | For | For |
| Fidelity | For | For | For |
| Dimensional | Abstain or withhold * | For | For |
| State Street and SPDR | For | For | For |
| American Century | For | For | For |
| Franklin Templeton | For | For | For |
| Invesco | For | For | For |
| Equitable | For | For | For |
| Charles Schwab | For | For | For |
| Nuveen and TIAA | For | For | For |
| ProShares and ProFunds | Split or no vote | For | For |
| John Hancock and Manulife | Abstain or withhold * | For | For |
| Morgan Stanley, Eaton Vance and Calvert | For | For | For |
| J.P. Morgan | For | For | For |
| Goldman Sachs | For | For | For |
| WisdomTree | Split or no vote | For | For |
| PGIM and Prudential | For | For | For |
| Jackson National funds | For | For | For |
| Northern Trust and FlexShares | For | For | For |
| SEI | For | For | For |
| T. Rowe Price | For | For | For |
| Lincoln Financial | For | For | For |
| Voya | For | For | For |
| First Trust | Split or no vote | For | For |
| Russell Investments | For | For | For |
| Nationwide | For | For | For |
| Victory Capital | Split or no vote | For | For |
| Brighthouse Funds | For | For | For |
| Guggenheim and Rydex | Split or no vote | For | For |
| Columbia Threadneedle | For | For | For |
| BNY Mellon | Split or no vote | For | For |
| Principal | Abstain or withhold * | For | For |
| Capital Group and American Funds | For | Against * | For |
| Pacific Life funds | For | For | For |
| Global X | For | For | For |
| MFS | Split or no vote | For | For |
| Transamerica | For | For | For |
| Federated Hermes | For | For | For |
| AllianceBernstein | For | For | For |
| Hartford Funds | For | For | For |
| DWS | Split or no vote | For | For |
| PIMCO | No report | For | No report |
| Allspring | Split or no vote | For | For |
| MassMutual | For | For | For |
| Harbor Funds | Split or no vote | For | For |
| Virtus | Split or no vote | For | For |
| VanEck | For | For | For |
| Macquarie and Delaware Funds | Abstain or withhold * | For | For |
| Janus Henderson | Split or no vote | For | For |
| Neuberger Berman | For | For | For |
| American Beacon | For | For | For |
| Natixis and Loomis Sayles | No report | For | No report |
| Lord Abbett | For | For | For |
| Baird | No report | For | No report |
| Artisan Partners | No report | For | No report |
* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.
Questions
How did large funds vote at the Bloom Energy Corporation meeting?
962 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the meeting of 21 May 2026. On say-on-pay, 59 of 916 voted against management (6.4%). The family table lists each of the largest families item by item.
Is this the meeting result?
No. These are the votes of funds and managers that file Form N-PX, counted by filer and by the shares they reported. The certified result, which includes every shareholder, is reported by Bloom Energy Corporation on Form 8-K.
Why are director elections shown as counts only?
Director records name the nominee. This site does not publish pages or rows about individuals, so for director elections it keeps the number of nominees and the split of votes and discards the wording.
Every meeting on file for Bloom Energy Corporation
Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings listing Bloom Energy Corporation with a meeting date within three days of 21 May 2026. Proposal titles are the most common wording among filers and are replaced by the SEC category where a wording could name a person. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 23 Sep 2026.