Home / Companies / Butterfly Network, Inc. / 12 Jun 2025
Butterfly Network, Inc.: meeting of 12 Jun 2025
Votes reported on Form N-PX, item by item
216 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the Butterfly Network, Inc. meeting of 12 Jun 2025. Their records fall into 4 items below, in ballot order: management items first, then proposals from security holders. Each bar shows how the reporting filers split; it is not the result of the meeting.
foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management
Items
DIRECTOR ELECTIONSIssuer
Director elections
7 nominees; 98.4% of reported votes for; 3 filers withheld from or voted against at least one nominee.
364 vote records from 39 filers. 1 of the 39 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESIssuer
Advisory vote on executive pay (say-on-pay)
247 vote records from 213 filers. 77 of the 201 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 12 filers reported this item without a management mark.
AUDIT-RELATEDIssuer
Audit-related items (auditor ratification)
52 vote records from 39 filers. 0 of the 39 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
COMPENSATIONIssuer
COMPENSATION: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
3 vote records from 3 filers. 0 of the 3 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
How the largest families voted
| Family | 1. Directors | 2. Say-on-pay | 3. Auditor |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vanguard | For | For | For |
| BlackRock and iShares | For | For | For |
| Fidelity | For | For | For |
| Dimensional | No report | Against * | No report |
| State Street and SPDR | For | For | For |
| American Century | For | Against * | For |
| Franklin Templeton | No report | Against * | No report |
| Invesco | For | Against * | For |
| Equitable | For | Against * | For |
| Charles Schwab | For | For | For |
| John Hancock and Manulife | For | Against * | For |
| Morgan Stanley, Eaton Vance and Calvert | No report | Against * | No report |
| J.P. Morgan | No report | Against * | No report |
| Goldman Sachs | For | For | For |
| PGIM and Prudential | No report | For | No report |
| Northern Trust and FlexShares | No report | Against * | No report |
| T. Rowe Price | Against * | Against * | For |
| First Trust | No report | Against * | No report |
| Russell Investments | For | For | For |
| Victory Capital | For | Against * | For |
| BNY Mellon | No report | Against * | No report |
| Principal | No report | Against * | No report |
| Capital Group and American Funds | For | Against * | For |
| DWS | No report | Against * | No report |
| PIMCO | No report | Against * | No report |
| Neuberger Berman | No report | For | No report |
| Natixis and Loomis Sayles | No report | For | No report |
| Lord Abbett | For | Against * | For |
* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.
Questions
How did large funds vote at the Butterfly Network, Inc. meeting?
216 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the meeting of 12 Jun 2025. On say-on-pay, 77 of 201 voted against management (38.3%). The family table lists each of the largest families item by item.
Is this the meeting result?
No. These are the votes of funds and managers that file Form N-PX, counted by filer and by the shares they reported. The certified result, which includes every shareholder, is reported by Butterfly Network, Inc. on Form 8-K.
Why are director elections shown as counts only?
Director records name the nominee. This site does not publish pages or rows about individuals, so for director elections it keeps the number of nominees and the split of votes and discards the wording.
Every meeting on file for Butterfly Network, Inc.
Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings listing Butterfly Network, Inc. with a meeting date within three days of 12 Jun 2025. Proposal titles are the most common wording among filers and are replaced by the SEC category where a wording could name a person. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 23 Sep 2026.