Vote Scores

Home / Companies / Butterfly Network, Inc. / 7 Jun 2024

Meeting · year to 30 June 2024219 filers reporting

Butterfly Network, Inc.: meeting of 7 Jun 2024

Votes reported on Form N-PX, item by item

219 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the Butterfly Network, Inc. meeting of 7 Jun 2024. Their records fall into 7 items below, in ballot order: management items first, then proposals from security holders. Each bar shows how the reporting filers split; it is not the result of the meeting.

foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management

Items

1

DIRECTOR ELECTIONSIssuer

Director elections

7 nominees; 93.6% of reported votes for; 13 filers withheld from or voted against at least one nominee.

625 vote records from 55 filers. 3 of the 53 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 2 filers reported this item without a management mark.

90.9% for5.5% against3.6% other5.7% against management55 filers
2

SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESIssuer

Advisory vote on executive pay (say-on-pay)

281 vote records from 215 filers. 134 of the 201 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 14 filers reported this item without a management mark.

29.3% for63.7% against7.0% other66.7% against management215 filers68.9% for31.1% against0.0% other30.9% against management34,986,963 reported shares
3

AUDIT-RELATEDIssuer

Audit-related items (auditor ratification)

90 vote records from 54 filers. 0 of the 52 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 2 filers reported this item without a management mark.

96.3% for0.0% against3.7% other0.0% against management54 filers100.0% for0.0% against0.0% against management15,491,174 reported shares
4

SHAREHOLDER RIGHTS AND DEFENSESIssuer

SHAREHOLDER RIGHTS AND DEFENSES: management items

Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.

80 vote records from 45 filers. 0 of the 43 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 2 filers reported this item without a management mark.

95.6% for0.0% against4.4% other0.0% against management45 filers100.0% for0.0% against0.0% against management4,160,877 reported shares, counted once per item in this group
5

CAPITAL STRUCTUREIssuer

CAPITAL STRUCTURE: management items

Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.

93 vote records from 52 filers. 0 of the 50 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 2 filers reported this item without a management mark.

90.4% for0.0% against9.6% other0.0% against management52 filers99.7% for0.3% against0.3% against management26,578,291 reported shares, counted once per item in this group
6

COMPENSATIONIssuer

COMPENSATION: management items

Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.

88 vote records from 53 filers. 32 of the 51 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 2 filers reported this item without a management mark.

34.0% for62.3% against3.8% other62.7% against management53 filers37.3% for62.7% against62.6% against management4,430,625 reported shares, counted once per item in this group
7

CORPORATE GOVERNANCEIssuer

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE: management items

Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.

100 vote records from 53 filers. 37 of the 51 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 2 filers reported this item without a management mark.

24.5% for69.8% against5.7% other72.5% against management53 filers93.1% for6.9% against6.9% against management26,821,958 reported shares, counted once per item in this group

How the largest families voted

Family1. Directors2. Say-on-pay3. Auditor
VanguardForForFor
BlackRock and iSharesForAgainst *For
FidelityForAgainst *For
State Street and SPDRForForFor
InvescoNo reportAgainst *No report
EquitableForAgainst *For
Charles SchwabForAgainst *For
Nuveen and TIAAForForFor
ProShares and ProFundsForAgainst *For
John Hancock and ManulifeForAgainst *For
Morgan Stanley, Eaton Vance and CalvertForAgainst *For
J.P. MorganNo reportAgainst *No report
Goldman SachsNo reportAgainst *No report
PGIM and PrudentialNo reportAgainst *No report
Northern Trust and FlexSharesNo reportForNo report
SEIForAgainst *For
T. Rowe PriceAgainst *Against *For
Lincoln FinancialForForFor
VoyaForAgainst *For
NationwideForAgainst *For
Victory CapitalForAgainst *For
Brighthouse FundsForAgainst *For
Guggenheim and RydexForAgainst *For
BNY MellonNo reportAgainst *No report
PrincipalForAgainst *For
Capital Group and American FundsNo reportSplit or no voteNo report
Pacific Life fundsForAgainst *For
Global XForAgainst *For
AllianceBernsteinNo reportAgainst *No report
DWSForAgainst *For
Janus HendersonNo reportAgainst *No report
Neuberger BermanNo reportAgainst *No report
Natixis and Loomis SaylesNo reportAgainst *No report

* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.

Questions

How did large funds vote at the Butterfly Network, Inc. meeting?

219 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the meeting of 7 Jun 2024. On say-on-pay, 134 of 201 voted against management (66.7%). The family table lists each of the largest families item by item.

Is this the meeting result?

No. These are the votes of funds and managers that file Form N-PX, counted by filer and by the shares they reported. The certified result, which includes every shareholder, is reported by Butterfly Network, Inc. on Form 8-K.

Why are director elections shown as counts only?

Director records name the nominee. This site does not publish pages or rows about individuals, so for director elections it keeps the number of nominees and the split of votes and discards the wording.

Every meeting on file for Butterfly Network, Inc.

Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings listing Butterfly Network, Inc. with a meeting date within three days of 7 Jun 2024. Proposal titles are the most common wording among filers and are replaced by the SEC category where a wording could name a person. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 23 Sep 2026.