Home / Companies / Celanese Corporation / 14 May 2025
Celanese Corporation: meeting of 14 May 2025
Votes reported on Form N-PX, item by item
739 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the Celanese Corporation meeting of 14 May 2025. Their records fall into 6 items below, in ballot order: management items first, then proposals from security holders. Each bar shows how the reporting filers split; it is not the result of the meeting.
foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management
Items
DIRECTOR ELECTIONSIssuer
Director elections
13 nominees; 96.2% of reported votes for; 38 filers withheld from or voted against at least one nominee.
6,573 vote records from 205 filers. 3 of the 204 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 1 filer reported this item without a management mark.
SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESIssuer
Advisory vote on executive pay (say-on-pay)
1,135 vote records from 729 filers. 48 of the 704 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 25 filers reported this item without a management mark.
AUDIT-RELATEDIssuer
Audit-related items (auditor ratification)
507 vote records from 205 filers. 4 of the 204 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 1 filer reported this item without a management mark.
SHAREHOLDER RIGHTS AND DEFENSESIssuer
SHAREHOLDER RIGHTS AND DEFENSES: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
444 vote records from 43 filers. 0 of the 42 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 1 filer reported this item without a management mark.
CORPORATE GOVERNANCEIssuer
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
1,596 vote records from 176 filers. 2 of the 175 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 1 filer reported this item without a management mark.
CORPORATE GOVERNANCESecurity holder
Advisory vote on shareholder proposal requesting simple majority vote charter and by-laws amendments
494 vote records from 202 filers. 120 of the 202 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
How the largest families voted
| Family | 1. Directors | 2. Say-on-pay | 3. Auditor | 6. Proposal |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vanguard | For | For | For | Against |
| BlackRock and iShares | For | For | For | Against |
| Fidelity | For | For | For | For * |
| Dimensional | For | For | For | For * |
| State Street and SPDR | For | For | For | Against |
| American Century | No report | For | No report | No report |
| Franklin Templeton | For | For | For | For * |
| Invesco | For | For | For | For * |
| Equitable | For | For | For | For * |
| Charles Schwab | For | For | For | Against |
| Nuveen and TIAA | For | For | For | Against |
| ProShares and ProFunds | For | For | For | For * |
| John Hancock and Manulife | For | For | For | Against |
| Morgan Stanley, Eaton Vance and Calvert | For | For | For | For * |
| J.P. Morgan | For | For | For | For * |
| Goldman Sachs | For | For | For | For * |
| WisdomTree | For | For | For | For * |
| PGIM and Prudential | For | For | For | Against |
| Jackson National funds | For | For | For | For * |
| Northern Trust and FlexShares | For | For | For | For * |
| SEI | For | For | For | Against |
| T. Rowe Price | For | For | For | Against |
| Thrivent | For | For | For | Against |
| Lincoln Financial | For | For | For | For * |
| Voya | For | For | For | For * |
| First Trust | For | For | For | For * |
| Russell Investments | For | For | For | Against |
| Nationwide | For | For | For | Against |
| Victory Capital | For | For | For | For * |
| Brighthouse Funds | For | For | For | Against |
| Guggenheim and Rydex | For | For | For | For * |
| Columbia Threadneedle | For | For | For | For * |
| BNY Mellon | For | For | For | For * |
| Principal | For | For | For | For * |
| Capital Group and American Funds | For | For | For | For * |
| Pacific Life funds | For | For | For | Against |
| Global X | For | For | For | No report |
| Transamerica | For | For | For | Against |
| Federated Hermes | For | For | For | Against |
| AllianceBernstein | For | For | For | For * |
| Hartford Funds | No report | For | No report | No report |
| DWS | For | For | For | For * |
| PIMCO | For | For | For | For * |
| Allspring | For | For | For | For * |
| MassMutual | For | For | For | Against |
| VanEck | For | For | For | Against |
| Macquarie and Delaware Funds | For | For | For | For * |
| Janus Henderson | For | For | For | For * |
| Neuberger Berman | No report | For | No report | No report |
| Natixis and Loomis Sayles | For | For | For | For * |
| Dodge & Cox | For | For | For | For * |
| Harris Associates and Oakmark | No report | For | No report | No report |
| Baird | No report | For | No report | No report |
* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.
Questions
How did large funds vote at the Celanese Corporation meeting?
739 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the meeting of 14 May 2025. On say-on-pay, 48 of 704 voted against management (6.8%). One proposal from security holders could be told apart in the filings. The family table lists each of the largest families item by item.
Is this the meeting result?
No. These are the votes of funds and managers that file Form N-PX, counted by filer and by the shares they reported. The certified result, which includes every shareholder, is reported by Celanese Corporation on Form 8-K.
Why are director elections shown as counts only?
Director records name the nominee. This site does not publish pages or rows about individuals, so for director elections it keeps the number of nominees and the split of votes and discards the wording.
Every meeting on file for Celanese Corporation
Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings listing Celanese Corporation with a meeting date within three days of 14 May 2025. Proposal titles are the most common wording among filers and are replaced by the SEC category where a wording could name a person. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 23 Sep 2026.