Home / Companies / ChargePoint Holdings, Inc. / 18 Jul 2023
ChargePoint Holdings, Inc.: meeting of 18 Jul 2023
Votes reported on Form N-PX, item by item
467 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the ChargePoint Holdings, Inc. meeting of 18 Jul 2023. Their records fall into 6 items below, in ballot order: management items first, then proposals from security holders. Each bar shows how the reporting filers split; it is not the result of the meeting.
foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management
Items
DIRECTOR ELECTIONSIssuer
Director elections
4 nominees; 88.1% of reported votes for; 36 filers withheld from or voted against at least one nominee.
582 vote records from 84 filers. 0 of the 79 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 5 filers reported this item without a management mark.
SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESIssuer
Advisory vote on executive pay (say-on-pay)
615 vote records from 459 filers. 253 of the 426 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 33 filers reported this item without a management mark.
0 filers reported share counts too large to be the holding described. No share split is published for this item. How that is decided
AUDIT-RELATEDIssuer
Audit-related items (auditor ratification)
145 vote records from 84 filers. 1 of the 79 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 5 filers reported this item without a management mark.
COMPENSATIONIssuer
COMPENSATION: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
23 vote records from 7 filers. 3 of the 7 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
CORPORATE GOVERNANCEIssuer
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
142 vote records from 81 filers. 14 of the 76 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 5 filers reported this item without a management mark.
Several categoriesSecurity holder
Shareholder proposals (not separable from the filings)
Filers described these proposals in wordings that could not be matched to one another, so they are shown together.
3 vote records from 1 filers. 0 of the 1 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
How the largest families voted
| Family | 1. Directors | 2. Say-on-pay | 3. Auditor |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vanguard | For | For | For |
| BlackRock and iShares | For | For | For |
| Fidelity | For | For | For |
| State Street and SPDR | For | For | For |
| American Century | For | Against * | For |
| Invesco | For | Against * | For |
| Equitable | Split or no vote | Against * | For |
| Charles Schwab | For | Against * | For |
| Nuveen and TIAA | For | Against * | For |
| John Hancock and Manulife | For | Against * | For |
| Morgan Stanley, Eaton Vance and Calvert | For | Against * | For |
| J.P. Morgan | For | Against * | For |
| Goldman Sachs | For | Against * | For |
| PGIM and Prudential | No report | Against * | No report |
| Jackson National funds | For | For | For |
| Northern Trust and FlexShares | For | For | For |
| SEI | For | Against * | For |
| T. Rowe Price | Split or no vote | Against * | For |
| Voya | For | Against * | For |
| First Trust | For | Against * | For |
| Nationwide | For | Against * | For |
| Victory Capital | For | Against * | For |
| Columbia Threadneedle | No report | Against * | No report |
| BNY Mellon | For | For | For |
| Principal | For | Against * | For |
| Pacific Life funds | For | For | For |
| AllianceBernstein | No report | Against * | No report |
| Hartford Funds | For | Against * | For |
| DWS | For | Against * | For |
| MassMutual | No report | For | No report |
| VanEck | For | Against * | For |
| Janus Henderson | No report | Against * | No report |
| Neuberger Berman | No report | Against * | No report |
| Natixis and Loomis Sayles | No report | Against * | No report |
| Baird | No report | Against * | No report |
* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.
Questions
How did large funds vote at the ChargePoint Holdings, Inc. meeting?
467 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the meeting of 18 Jul 2023. On say-on-pay, 253 of 426 voted against management (59.4%). The family table lists each of the largest families item by item.
Is this the meeting result?
No. These are the votes of funds and managers that file Form N-PX, counted by filer and by the shares they reported. The certified result, which includes every shareholder, is reported by ChargePoint Holdings, Inc. on Form 8-K.
Why are director elections shown as counts only?
Director records name the nominee. This site does not publish pages or rows about individuals, so for director elections it keeps the number of nominees and the split of votes and discards the wording.
Every meeting on file for ChargePoint Holdings, Inc.
Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings listing ChargePoint Holdings, Inc. with a meeting date within three days of 18 Jul 2023. Proposal titles are the most common wording among filers and are replaced by the SEC category where a wording could name a person. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 23 Sep 2026.