Home / Companies / Chartwell Retirement Residences / 4 Jun 2024
Chartwell Retirement Residences: meeting of 4 Jun 2024
Votes reported on Form N-PX, item by item
70 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the Chartwell Retirement Residences meeting of 4 Jun 2024. Their records fall into 8 items below, in ballot order: management items first, then proposals from security holders. Each bar shows how the reporting filers split; it is not the result of the meeting.
foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management
Items
DIRECTOR ELECTIONSIssuer
Director elections
14 nominees; 97.4% of reported votes for; 5 filers withheld from or voted against at least one nominee.
854 vote records from 50 filers. 1 of the 49 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 1 filer reported this item without a management mark.
SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESIssuer
Advisory vote on executive pay (say-on-pay)
25 vote records from 21 filers. 1 of the 19 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 2 filers reported this item without a management mark.
AUDIT-RELATEDIssuer
Audit-related items (auditor ratification)
61 vote records from 50 filers. 0 of the 49 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 1 filer reported this item without a management mark.
SHAREHOLDER RIGHTS AND DEFENSESIssuer
SHAREHOLDER RIGHTS AND DEFENSES: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
60 vote records from 50 filers. 3 of the 50 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
COMPENSATIONIssuer
COMPENSATION: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
130 vote records from 51 filers. 0 of the 50 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 1 filer reported this item without a management mark.
HUMAN RIGHTS OR HUMAN CAPITAL/WORKFORCESecurity holder
Human Capital Disclosure
46 vote records from 39 filers. 11 of the 39 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
HUMAN RIGHTS OR HUMAN CAPITAL/WORKFORCESecurity holder
Shareholder Proposal Regarding Report on Direct Care and Staffing Ratios
10 vote records from 8 filers. 1 of the 8 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
Several categoriesSecurity holder
Shareholder proposals (not separable from the filings)
Filers described these proposals in wordings that could not be matched to one another, so they are shown together.
2 vote records from 1 filers. 0 of the 1 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
How the largest families voted
| Family | 1. Directors | 2. Say-on-pay | 3. Auditor | 6. Proposal | 7. Proposal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vanguard | For | No report | For | Against | No report |
| BlackRock and iShares | For | No report | For | Against | No report |
| American Century | For | No report | For | Against | No report |
| Franklin Templeton | For | No report | For | Against | No report |
| Invesco | For | No report | For | Against | No report |
| Equitable | For | No report | For | Against | No report |
| Charles Schwab | For | No report | For | No report | Against |
| Nuveen and TIAA | For | No report | For | For * | No report |
| Morgan Stanley, Eaton Vance and Calvert | For | No report | For | Against | No report |
| J.P. Morgan | For | For | For | No report | No report |
| Goldman Sachs | For | Split or no vote | For | Against | No report |
| PGIM and Prudential | For | No report | For | No report | Against |
| Northern Trust and FlexShares | For | Against * | For | For * | No report |
| Voya | For | No report | For | Against | No report |
| Russell Investments | For | No report | For | No report | Against |
| Brighthouse Funds | For | No report | For | Against * | No report |
| BNY Mellon | For | No report | For | For * | No report |
| Principal | For | No report | For | Against | No report |
| Global X | For | No report | For | No report | No report |
| DWS | For | No report | For | For * | No report |
| Virtus | For | No report | For | Against | No report |
| Janus Henderson | For | No report | For | Against | No report |
* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.
Questions
How did large funds vote at the Chartwell Retirement Residences meeting?
70 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the meeting of 4 Jun 2024. On say-on-pay, 1 of 19 voted against management (5.3%). 2 proposals from security holders could be told apart in the filings. The family table lists each of the largest families item by item.
Is this the meeting result?
No. These are the votes of funds and managers that file Form N-PX, counted by filer and by the shares they reported. The certified result, which includes every shareholder, is reported by Chartwell Retirement Residences on Form 8-K.
Why are director elections shown as counts only?
Director records name the nominee. This site does not publish pages or rows about individuals, so for director elections it keeps the number of nominees and the split of votes and discards the wording.
Every meeting on file for Chartwell Retirement Residences
Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings listing Chartwell Retirement Residences with a meeting date within three days of 4 Jun 2024. Proposal titles are the most common wording among filers and are replaced by the SEC category where a wording could name a person. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 23 Sep 2026.