Vote Scores

Home / Companies / Cimpress Plc / 14 Dec 2023

Meeting · year to 30 June 2024289 filers reporting

Cimpress Plc: meeting of 14 Dec 2023

Votes reported on Form N-PX, item by item

289 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the Cimpress Plc meeting of 14 Dec 2023. Their records fall into 5 items below, in ballot order: management items first, then proposals from security holders. Each bar shows how the reporting filers split; it is not the result of the meeting.

foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management

Items

1

DIRECTOR ELECTIONSIssuer

Director elections

1 nominee; 44.0% of reported votes for; 55 filers withheld from or voted against at least one nominee.

209 vote records from 104 filers. 53 of the 104 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.

49.0% for50.0% against1.0% other51.0% against management104 filers
2

SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESIssuer

Advisory vote on executive pay (say-on-pay)

435 vote records from 283 filers. 159 of the 273 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 10 filers reported this item without a management mark.

40.6% for55.5% against3.9% other58.2% against management283 filers
3

SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESIssuer

Frequency of the say-on-pay vote

one year: 255 filers; three years: 8 filers; for: 3 filers; takenoaction: 2 filers; not applicable: 2 filers; : 1 filer.

436 vote records from 282 filers. 10 of the 270 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 12 filers reported this item without a management mark.

1.1% for0.0% against98.9% other3.7% against management282 filers
4

AUDIT-RELATEDIssuer

Audit-related items (auditor ratification)

416 vote records from 104 filers. 1 of the 104 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.

0 filers reported share counts too large to be the holding described. No share split is published for this item. How that is decided

98.1% for0.0% against1.9% other1.0% against management104 filers
5

CAPITAL STRUCTUREIssuer

CAPITAL STRUCTURE: management items

Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.

412 vote records from 101 filers. 2 of the 101 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.

96.0% for2.0% against2.0% other2.0% against management101 filers100.0% for0.0% against0.0% against management2,958,971,736 reported shares, counted once per item in this group

How the largest families voted

Family1. Directors2. Say-on-pay3. Pay-vote frequency4. Auditor
VanguardForForSplit or no voteFor
BlackRock and iSharesForForSplit or no voteFor
FidelityAgainst *Against *Split or no voteFor
DimensionalAgainst *Against *Split or no vote *For
State Street and SPDRForAgainst *Split or no voteFor
American CenturyAgainst *Against *Split or no voteFor
Franklin TempletonForForSplit or no voteFor
InvescoAgainst *Against *Split or no voteFor
EquitableForForSplit or no voteFor
Charles SchwabForForSplit or no voteFor
Nuveen and TIAAForForSplit or no voteFor
ProShares and ProFundsAgainst *Against *Split or no voteFor
John Hancock and ManulifeAgainst *Against *Split or no voteFor
Morgan Stanley, Eaton Vance and CalvertAgainst *Against *Split or no voteFor
J.P. MorganForAgainst *Split or no voteFor
Goldman SachsForAgainst *Split or no voteFor
PGIM and PrudentialNo reportAgainst *Split or no voteNo report
Jackson National fundsAgainst *Against *Split or no vote *For
Northern Trust and FlexSharesForAgainst *Split or no voteFor
SEIAgainst *ForSplit or no voteFor
T. Rowe PriceForAgainst *Split or no voteFor
ThriventAgainst *Against *Split or no voteFor
Lincoln FinancialForAgainst *Split or no voteFor
VoyaAgainst *Against *Split or no voteFor
First TrustForAgainst *Split or no voteFor
Russell InvestmentsNo reportForSplit or no voteNo report
NationwideAgainst *Against *Split or no voteFor
Victory CapitalAgainst *Against *Split or no voteFor
Brighthouse FundsAgainst *Against *Split or no voteFor
Guggenheim and RydexAgainst *Against *Split or no voteFor
Columbia ThreadneedleForForSplit or no voteFor
BNY MellonForForSplit or no voteFor
PrincipalAgainst *Against *Split or no voteFor
Pacific Life fundsForForSplit or no voteFor
TransamericaForForSplit or no voteFor
Federated HermesAgainst *ForSplit or no voteFor
AllianceBernsteinNo reportAgainst *Split or no voteNo report
DWSAgainst *Against *Split or no voteFor
PIMCOAgainst *Against *Split or no voteSplit or no vote
AllspringAgainst *Against *Split or no voteFor
Harbor FundsForForSplit or no voteFor
Janus HendersonForForSplit or no voteFor
Neuberger BermanNo reportForSplit or no voteNo report
Natixis and Loomis SaylesAgainst *ForSplit or no voteFor

* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.

Questions

How did large funds vote at the Cimpress Plc meeting?

289 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the meeting of 14 Dec 2023. On say-on-pay, 159 of 273 voted against management (58.2%). The family table lists each of the largest families item by item.

Is this the meeting result?

No. These are the votes of funds and managers that file Form N-PX, counted by filer and by the shares they reported. The certified result, which includes every shareholder, is reported by Cimpress Plc on Form 8-K.

Why are director elections shown as counts only?

Director records name the nominee. This site does not publish pages or rows about individuals, so for director elections it keeps the number of nominees and the split of votes and discards the wording.

Every meeting on file for Cimpress Plc

Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings listing Cimpress Plc with a meeting date within three days of 14 Dec 2023. Proposal titles are the most common wording among filers and are replaced by the SEC category where a wording could name a person. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 23 Sep 2026.