Vote Scores

Home / Companies / Cimpress Plc / 20 Nov 2024

Meeting · year to 30 June 2025301 filers reporting

Cimpress Plc: meeting of 20 Nov 2024

Votes reported on Form N-PX, item by item

301 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the Cimpress Plc meeting of 20 Nov 2024. Their records fall into 5 items below, in ballot order: management items first, then proposals from security holders. Each bar shows how the reporting filers split; it is not the result of the meeting.

foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management

Items

1

DIRECTOR ELECTIONSIssuer

Director elections

1 nominee; 60.7% of reported votes for; 42 filers withheld from or voted against at least one nominee.

215 vote records from 107 filers. 39 of the 105 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 2 filers reported this item without a management mark.

61.7% for36.4% against1.9% other37.1% against management107 filers
2

SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESIssuer

Advisory vote on executive pay (say-on-pay)

454 vote records from 297 filers. 31 of the 283 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 14 filers reported this item without a management mark.

84.5% for10.1% against5.4% other11.0% against management297 filers99.0% for0.8% against0.1% other1.0% against management22,828,270 reported shares
3

AUDIT-RELATEDIssuer

Audit-related items (auditor ratification)

430 vote records from 107 filers. 0 of the 105 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 2 filers reported this item without a management mark.

98.1% for0.0% against1.9% other0.0% against management107 filers100.0% for0.0% against0.0% against management16,145,636 reported shares
4

CAPITAL STRUCTUREIssuer

CAPITAL STRUCTURE: management items

Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.

428 vote records from 106 filers. 1 of the 104 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 2 filers reported this item without a management mark.

96.2% for0.9% against2.8% other1.0% against management106 filers99.8% for0.2% against0.2% against management16,141,166 reported shares, counted once per item in this group
5

COMPENSATIONIssuer

COMPENSATION: management items

Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.

220 vote records from 110 filers. 68 of the 108 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 2 filers reported this item without a management mark.

35.5% for62.7% against1.8% other63.0% against management110 filers72.2% for27.8% against27.5% against management8,737,985 reported shares, counted once per item in this group

How the largest families voted

Family1. Directors2. Say-on-pay3. Auditor
VanguardForForFor
BlackRock and iSharesForForFor
FidelityForForFor
DimensionalAgainst *ForFor
State Street and SPDRForForFor
American CenturyForAgainst *For
Franklin TempletonAgainst *ForFor
InvescoForForFor
EquitableForForFor
Charles SchwabForForFor
Nuveen and TIAAAgainst *ForFor
ProShares and ProFundsAgainst *ForFor
John Hancock and ManulifeAgainst *ForFor
Morgan Stanley, Eaton Vance and CalvertAgainst *ForFor
J.P. MorganForForFor
Goldman SachsForForFor
PGIM and PrudentialForForFor
Jackson National fundsAgainst *ForFor
Northern Trust and FlexSharesForForFor
SEIForForFor
T. Rowe PriceForForFor
Lincoln FinancialForForFor
VoyaAgainst *Against *For
First TrustForForFor
Russell InvestmentsNo reportForNo report
NationwideAgainst *ForFor
Victory CapitalAgainst *ForFor
Brighthouse FundsAgainst *ForFor
Guggenheim and RydexAgainst *ForFor
BNY MellonNo reportForNo report
PrincipalNo reportForNo report
Pacific Life fundsForForFor
Global XForForFor
TransamericaForForFor
Federated HermesForForFor
AllianceBernsteinNo reportForNo report
DWSAgainst *ForFor
PIMCOAgainst *ForFor
AllspringAgainst *ForFor
Harbor FundsForForFor
Janus HendersonForForFor
Neuberger BermanNo reportForNo report
Natixis and Loomis SaylesForForFor

* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.

Questions

How did large funds vote at the Cimpress Plc meeting?

301 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the meeting of 20 Nov 2024. On say-on-pay, 31 of 283 voted against management (11.0%). The family table lists each of the largest families item by item.

Is this the meeting result?

No. These are the votes of funds and managers that file Form N-PX, counted by filer and by the shares they reported. The certified result, which includes every shareholder, is reported by Cimpress Plc on Form 8-K.

Why are director elections shown as counts only?

Director records name the nominee. This site does not publish pages or rows about individuals, so for director elections it keeps the number of nominees and the split of votes and discards the wording.

Every meeting on file for Cimpress Plc

Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings listing Cimpress Plc with a meeting date within three days of 20 Nov 2024. Proposal titles are the most common wording among filers and are replaced by the SEC category where a wording could name a person. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 23 Sep 2026.