Vote Scores

Home / Companies / Cincinnati Financial Corporation / 2 May 2026

Meeting · year to 30 June 2026939 filers reporting

Cincinnati Financial Corporation: meeting of 2 May 2026

Votes reported on Form N-PX, item by item

939 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the Cincinnati Financial Corporation meeting of 2 May 2026. Their records fall into 8 items below, in ballot order: management items first, then proposals from security holders. Each bar shows how the reporting filers split; it is not the result of the meeting.

foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management

Items

1

DIRECTOR ELECTIONSIssuer

Director elections

14 nominees; 91.6% of reported votes for; 72 filers withheld from or voted against at least one nominee.

9,116 vote records from 246 filers. 3 of the 244 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 2 filers reported this item without a management mark.

98.4% for0.4% against1.2% other1.2% against management246 filers
2

SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESIssuer

Advisory vote on executive pay (say-on-pay)

1,536 vote records from 968 filers. 41 of the 936 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 32 filers reported this item without a management mark.

92.0% for4.4% against3.5% other4.4% against management968 filers97.8% for2.2% against0.0% other2.1% against management123,538,566 reported shares
3

AUDIT-RELATEDIssuer

Audit-related items (auditor ratification)

651 vote records from 245 filers. 8 of the 243 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 2 filers reported this item without a management mark.

95.9% for2.9% against1.2% other3.3% against management245 filers99.8% for0.2% against0.0% other0.2% against management47,310,930 reported shares
4

SHAREHOLDER RIGHTS AND DEFENSESIssuer

SHAREHOLDER RIGHTS AND DEFENSES: management items

Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.

148 vote records from 44 filers. 14 of the 44 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.

68.2% for29.5% against2.3% other31.8% against management44 filers98.7% for1.3% against0.0% other1.6% against management12,171,865 reported shares, counted once per item in this group
5

COMPENSATIONIssuer

COMPENSATION: management items

Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.

25 vote records from 14 filers. 2 of the 14 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.

92.9% for0.0% against7.1% other14.3% against management14 filers100.0% for0.0% against0.0% other1.2% against management220,792 reported shares, counted once per item in this group
6

CORPORATE GOVERNANCEIssuer

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE: management items

Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.

502 vote records from 202 filers. 20 of the 200 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 2 filers reported this item without a management mark.

88.6% for9.9% against1.5% other10.0% against management202 filers99.4% for0.6% against0.0% other0.6% against management35,113,950 reported shares, counted once per item in this group
7

CORPORATE GOVERNANCESecurity holder

A nonbinding shareholder proposal

637 vote records from 219 filers. 117 of the 217 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 2 filers reported this item without a management mark.

52.1% for46.6% against1.4% other53.9% against management219 filers10.0% for90.0% against0.0% other10.0% against management47,269,673 reported shares
8

Several categoriesSecurity holder

Shareholder proposals (not separable from the filings)

Filers described these proposals in wordings that could not be matched to one another, so they are shown together.

1 vote records from 1 filers. 0 of the 1 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.

0.0% for100.0% against0.0% against management1 filers0.0% for100.0% against0.0% against management254 reported shares, counted once per item in this group

How the largest families voted

Family1. Directors2. Say-on-pay3. Auditor7. Proposal
VanguardForForForAgainst
BlackRock and iSharesForForForAgainst
FidelityForForForAgainst
DimensionalForForForAgainst
State Street and SPDRForForForAgainst
American CenturyForForForAgainst
Franklin TempletonForForForFor *
InvescoForForForAgainst
EquitableForForForFor *
Charles SchwabForForForAgainst
Nuveen and TIAAForForForAgainst
ProShares and ProFundsForForForFor *
John Hancock and ManulifeForForForAgainst
Morgan Stanley, Eaton Vance and CalvertForForForFor *
J.P. MorganForForForAgainst
Goldman SachsForForForAgainst
WisdomTreeForForForAgainst
PGIM and PrudentialForForForFor *
Jackson National fundsForForForAgainst
Northern Trust and FlexSharesForForForFor *
SEIForForForFor *
T. Rowe PriceForForForAgainst
ThriventForForForFor *
Lincoln FinancialForForForAgainst
VoyaForForForAgainst
First TrustForForForFor *
Russell InvestmentsForForForFor *
NationwideForForForAgainst
Victory CapitalForForForFor *
Brighthouse FundsForForForFor *
Guggenheim and RydexForForForFor *
Columbia ThreadneedleForForForFor *
BNY MellonForForForAgainst
PrincipalForForForFor *
Pacific Life fundsForForForAgainst
Global XForForForFor *
TransamericaForForForFor *
Federated HermesForForForAgainst
AllianceBernsteinForForForFor *
Hartford FundsNo reportForNo reportNo report
DWSForForForFor *
PIMCOForForForFor *
AllspringSplit or no voteSplit or no voteSplit or no voteSplit or no vote
MassMutualForForForFor *
Harbor FundsForForForAgainst
VirtusForForForFor *
Macquarie and Delaware FundsNo reportForNo reportNo report
Janus HendersonNo reportForNo reportNo report
Neuberger BermanNo reportForNo reportNo report
American BeaconForForForAgainst
Natixis and Loomis SaylesForForForFor *
BairdNo reportForNo reportNo report

* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.

Questions

How did large funds vote at the Cincinnati Financial Corporation meeting?

939 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the meeting of 2 May 2026. On say-on-pay, 41 of 936 voted against management (4.4%). One proposal from security holders could be told apart in the filings. The family table lists each of the largest families item by item.

Is this the meeting result?

No. These are the votes of funds and managers that file Form N-PX, counted by filer and by the shares they reported. The certified result, which includes every shareholder, is reported by Cincinnati Financial Corporation on Form 8-K.

Why are director elections shown as counts only?

Director records name the nominee. This site does not publish pages or rows about individuals, so for director elections it keeps the number of nominees and the split of votes and discards the wording.

Every meeting on file for Cincinnati Financial Corporation

Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings listing Cincinnati Financial Corporation with a meeting date within three days of 2 May 2026. Proposal titles are the most common wording among filers and are replaced by the SEC category where a wording could name a person. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 23 Sep 2026.