Vote Scores

Home / Companies / Crown Holdings, Inc. / 2 May 2024

Meeting · year to 30 June 2024706 filers reporting

Crown Holdings, Inc.: meeting of 2 May 2024

Votes reported on Form N-PX, item by item

706 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the Crown Holdings, Inc. meeting of 2 May 2024. Their records fall into 6 items below, in ballot order: management items first, then proposals from security holders. Each bar shows how the reporting filers split; it is not the result of the meeting.

foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management

Items

1

DIRECTOR ELECTIONSIssuer

Director elections

10 nominees; 91.0% of reported votes for; 34 filers withheld from or voted against at least one nominee.

5,115 vote records from 222 filers. 7 of the 222 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.

96.4% for0.0% against3.6% other3.2% against management222 filers
2

SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESIssuer

Advisory vote on executive pay (say-on-pay)

1,091 vote records from 694 filers. 41 of the 672 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 22 filers reported this item without a management mark.

2 filers reported share counts too large to be the holding described. No share split is published for this item. How that is decided

90.8% for5.8% against3.5% other6.1% against management694 filers
3

AUDIT-RELATEDIssuer

Audit-related items (auditor ratification)

512 vote records from 220 filers. 8 of the 220 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.

96.4% for2.7% against0.9% other3.6% against management220 filers99.8% for0.1% against0.1% other0.2% against management52,699,840 reported shares
4

CORPORATE GOVERNANCEIssuer

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE: management items

Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.

508 vote records from 219 filers. 1 of the 219 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.

99.1% for0.0% against0.9% other0.5% against management219 filers99.9% for0.0% against0.1% other0.1% against management52,635,225 reported shares, counted once per item in this group
5

OTHER SOCIAL ISSUESSecurity holder

Consideration of a Shareholder's proposal regarding transparency in political spending.

499 vote records from 212 filers. 129 of the 212 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.

59.4% for38.2% against2.4% other60.8% against management212 filers46.0% for53.1% against0.9% other41.6% against management55,369,337 reported shares
6

Several categoriesSecurity holder

Shareholder proposals (not separable from the filings)

Filers described these proposals in wordings that could not be matched to one another, so they are shown together.

12 vote records from 9 filers. 7 of the 9 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.

22.2% for33.3% against44.4% other77.8% against management9 filers21.4% for27.1% against51.6% other74.6% against management259,300 reported shares, counted once per item in this group

How the largest families voted

Family1. Directors2. Say-on-pay3. Auditor5. Proposal
VanguardForForForAgainst
BlackRock and iSharesForForForAgainst
FidelityForForForFor *
DimensionalAbstain or withhold *ForForAgainst
State Street and SPDRForForForFor *
American CenturyForForForFor *
Franklin TempletonForForForFor *
InvescoForForForAgainst
EquitableForForForFor *
Charles SchwabForForForFor *
Nuveen and TIAAForForForFor *
ProShares and ProFundsForForForFor *
John Hancock and ManulifeForForForAgainst
Morgan Stanley, Eaton Vance and CalvertForForForFor *
J.P. MorganForForForAgainst
Goldman SachsForForForAgainst
WisdomTreeForForForAgainst
PGIM and PrudentialForForForAgainst
Jackson National fundsForForForAgainst
Northern Trust and FlexSharesForForForFor *
SEIForForForFor *
T. Rowe PriceForForForAgainst
ThriventForForForAgainst
Lincoln FinancialForForForFor *
VoyaForForForFor *
First TrustForForForAgainst
Russell InvestmentsForForForFor *
NationwideForForForFor *
Victory CapitalForForForFor *
Brighthouse FundsForForForFor *
Guggenheim and RydexForForForFor *
Columbia ThreadneedleForForForFor *
BNY MellonForForForAgainst
PrincipalForForForFor *
Capital Group and American FundsNo reportSplit or no voteNo reportNo report
Pacific Life fundsForForForAgainst
MFSForForForAgainst
TransamericaForForForFor *
Federated HermesNo reportForNo reportNo report
AllianceBernsteinForForForFor *
Hartford FundsForForForFor *
PIMCOForForAgainst *For *
AllspringForForForFor *
MassMutualForForForFor *
Macquarie and Delaware FundsForForForFor *
Janus HendersonForForForAgainst
Neuberger BermanForForForFor *
Natixis and Loomis SaylesForForForFor *
Harris Associates and OakmarkNo reportForNo reportNo report
BairdNo reportForNo reportNo report

* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.

Questions

How did large funds vote at the Crown Holdings, Inc. meeting?

706 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the meeting of 2 May 2024. On say-on-pay, 41 of 672 voted against management (6.1%). One proposal from security holders could be told apart in the filings. The family table lists each of the largest families item by item.

Is this the meeting result?

No. These are the votes of funds and managers that file Form N-PX, counted by filer and by the shares they reported. The certified result, which includes every shareholder, is reported by Crown Holdings, Inc. on Form 8-K.

Why are director elections shown as counts only?

Director records name the nominee. This site does not publish pages or rows about individuals, so for director elections it keeps the number of nominees and the split of votes and discards the wording.

Every meeting on file for Crown Holdings, Inc.

Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings listing Crown Holdings, Inc. with a meeting date within three days of 2 May 2024. Proposal titles are the most common wording among filers and are replaced by the SEC category where a wording could name a person. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 23 Sep 2026.