Home / Companies / Cutera, Inc. / 15 Jul 2024
Cutera, Inc.: meeting of 15 Jul 2024
Votes reported on Form N-PX, item by item
130 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the Cutera, Inc. meeting of 15 Jul 2024. Their records fall into 5 items below, in ballot order: management items first, then proposals from security holders. Each bar shows how the reporting filers split; it is not the result of the meeting.
foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management
Items
DIRECTOR ELECTIONSIssuer
Director elections
5 nominees; 84.5% of reported votes for; 24 filers withheld from or voted against at least one nominee.
400 vote records from 45 filers. 7 of the 45 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESIssuer
Advisory vote on executive pay (say-on-pay)
176 vote records from 128 filers. 26 of the 122 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 6 filers reported this item without a management mark.
AUDIT-RELATEDIssuer
Audit-related items (auditor ratification)
80 vote records from 45 filers. 0 of the 45 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
CAPITAL STRUCTUREIssuer
CAPITAL STRUCTURE: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
5 vote records from 3 filers. 2 of the 3 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
COMPENSATIONIssuer
COMPENSATION: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
157 vote records from 46 filers. 29 of the 46 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
How the largest families voted
| Family | 1. Directors | 2. Say-on-pay | 3. Auditor |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vanguard | For | For | For |
| BlackRock and iShares | For | For | For |
| Fidelity | For | For | For |
| State Street and SPDR | Against * | For | For |
| Invesco | No report | For | No report |
| Equitable | For | For | For |
| Charles Schwab | For | Against * | For |
| ProShares and ProFunds | For | For | For |
| John Hancock and Manulife | For | For | For |
| Morgan Stanley, Eaton Vance and Calvert | For | For | For |
| J.P. Morgan | No report | For | No report |
| Goldman Sachs | No report | For | No report |
| PGIM and Prudential | No report | Against * | No report |
| Northern Trust and FlexShares | Against * | For | For |
| SEI | For | Against * | For |
| T. Rowe Price | For | For | For |
| Lincoln Financial | Against * | For | For |
| Nationwide | For | For | For |
| Guggenheim and Rydex | For | For | For |
| BNY Mellon | No report | For | No report |
| Principal | For | For | For |
| Pacific Life funds | For | For | For |
| Global X | For | Against * | For |
| Federated Hermes | Against * | Against * | For |
| AllianceBernstein | No report | For | No report |
| DWS | For | For | For |
| Janus Henderson | No report | For | No report |
| Neuberger Berman | No report | Against * | No report |
* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.
Questions
How did large funds vote at the Cutera, Inc. meeting?
130 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the meeting of 15 Jul 2024. On say-on-pay, 26 of 122 voted against management (21.3%). The family table lists each of the largest families item by item.
Is this the meeting result?
No. These are the votes of funds and managers that file Form N-PX, counted by filer and by the shares they reported. The certified result, which includes every shareholder, is reported by Cutera, Inc. on Form 8-K.
Why are director elections shown as counts only?
Director records name the nominee. This site does not publish pages or rows about individuals, so for director elections it keeps the number of nominees and the split of votes and discards the wording.
Every meeting on file for Cutera, Inc.
Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings listing Cutera, Inc. with a meeting date within three days of 15 Jul 2024. Proposal titles are the most common wording among filers and are replaced by the SEC category where a wording could name a person. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 30 Sep 2026.