Home / Companies / Dana Incorporated / 24 Apr 2025
Dana Incorporated: meeting of 24 Apr 2025
Votes reported on Form N-PX, item by item
414 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the Dana Incorporated meeting of 24 Apr 2025. Their records fall into 5 items below, in ballot order: management items first, then proposals from security holders. Each bar shows how the reporting filers split; it is not the result of the meeting.
foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management
Items
DIRECTOR ELECTIONSIssuer
Director elections
9 nominees; 97.3% of reported votes for; 19 filers withheld from or voted against at least one nominee.
2,649 vote records from 150 filers. 2 of the 150 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESIssuer
Advisory vote on executive pay (say-on-pay)
612 vote records from 410 filers. 114 of the 396 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 14 filers reported this item without a management mark.
AUDIT-RELATEDIssuer
Audit-related items (auditor ratification)
295 vote records from 149 filers. 8 of the 149 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
COMPENSATIONIssuer
COMPENSATION: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
300 vote records from 154 filers. 15 of the 154 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
CORPORATE GOVERNANCESecurity holder
Shareholder proposal to require an independent Board Chairman.
288 vote records from 144 filers. 62 of the 144 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
How the largest families voted
| Family | 1. Directors | 2. Say-on-pay | 3. Auditor | 5. Proposal |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vanguard | For | For | For | Against |
| BlackRock and iShares | For | For | For | Against |
| Fidelity | For | For | For | Against |
| Dimensional | For | Against * | For | Against |
| State Street and SPDR | For | For | For | Against |
| American Century | For | For | For | Against |
| Franklin Templeton | For | For | For | For * |
| Invesco | For | Against * | For | For * |
| Equitable | For | For | For | Against |
| Charles Schwab | For | For | For | Against |
| Nuveen and TIAA | For | For | For | Against |
| ProShares and ProFunds | For | For | For | For * |
| John Hancock and Manulife | For | For | For | For * |
| Morgan Stanley, Eaton Vance and Calvert | For | For | For | For * |
| J.P. Morgan | For | For | For | Against |
| Goldman Sachs | For | For | For | Against |
| WisdomTree | For | Against * | For | Against |
| PGIM and Prudential | For | Against * | For | For * |
| Jackson National funds | For | Against * | For | Against |
| Northern Trust and FlexShares | For | For | For | Against |
| SEI | For | Against * | For | For * |
| T. Rowe Price | For | For | For | Against |
| Thrivent | For | For | For | For * |
| Lincoln Financial | For | For | For | Against |
| Voya | For | For | For | Against |
| First Trust | For | For | For | For * |
| Russell Investments | For | Against * | For | For * |
| Nationwide | For | For | For | For * |
| Victory Capital | For | For | For | For * |
| Brighthouse Funds | For | For | For | Against * |
| Guggenheim and Rydex | For | For | For | For * |
| Columbia Threadneedle | For | For | For | For * |
| BNY Mellon | For | Against * | For | Against |
| Principal | For | For | For | For * |
| Pacific Life funds | For | For | For | Against |
| Global X | For | Against * | For | No report |
| MFS | For | For | For | For * |
| Federated Hermes | No report | Against * | No report | No report |
| AllianceBernstein | No report | For | No report | No report |
| DWS | For | For | For | For * |
| PIMCO | For | For | For | For * |
| MassMutual | No report | For | No report | No report |
| Harbor Funds | For | For | For | Against |
| Virtus | For | For | For | For * |
| Neuberger Berman | No report | Against * | No report | No report |
| Natixis and Loomis Sayles | No report | Against * | No report | No report |
| Baird | No report | For | No report | No report |
* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.
Questions
How did large funds vote at the Dana Incorporated meeting?
414 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the meeting of 24 Apr 2025. On say-on-pay, 114 of 396 voted against management (28.8%). One proposal from security holders could be told apart in the filings. The family table lists each of the largest families item by item.
Is this the meeting result?
No. These are the votes of funds and managers that file Form N-PX, counted by filer and by the shares they reported. The certified result, which includes every shareholder, is reported by Dana Incorporated on Form 8-K.
Why are director elections shown as counts only?
Director records name the nominee. This site does not publish pages or rows about individuals, so for director elections it keeps the number of nominees and the split of votes and discards the wording.
Every meeting on file for Dana Incorporated
Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings listing Dana Incorporated with a meeting date within three days of 24 Apr 2025. Proposal titles are the most common wording among filers and are replaced by the SEC category where a wording could name a person. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 23 Sep 2026.