Vote Scores

Home / Companies / Darden Restaurants, Inc.

Company · votes reported on Form N-PXDRI · SEC company no. 940944

Darden Restaurants, Inc.

How funds and institutional managers reported voting their shares, year to 30 June 2026

Filers reporting
1,105year to 30 June 2026
Against management on pay
4.6%48 of 1,052 reporting filers
Same, by reported shares
2.0%shares reported on Form N-PX
Meetings on file
3across 3 seasons
92.3% for4.1% against3.6% other4.6% against management1,083 filers on say-on-pay

foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management

For the year to 30 June 2026, 1,105 funds and managers listed Darden Restaurants, Inc. in their Form N-PX filings (2 meetings).

On the advisory vote on executive pay, 48 of the 1,052 filers that reported a position voted against management (4.6%), 2.0 percentage points below the median company on this site (6.6%). By reported shares the figure is 2.0% (median 2.9%). These are shares of the filers reporting on Form N-PX, not of all votes cast at the meeting.

Meetings

Meeting dateSeasonFilers reportingItemsAgainst management on pay
17 Sep 2025year to 30 June 20261,09564.6%
18 Sep 2024year to 30 June 20251,02897.1%
20 Sep 2023year to 30 June 202499977.7%

Meetings with 20 or more reporting filers have their own page with every item. Dates are as filers typed them; dates up to three days apart are treated as one meeting.

Say-on-pay: this company and the median

year to 30 June 2026Darden Restaurants, Inc.Median company
Reporting filers voting against management4.6%6.6%
Reported shares voted against management2.0%2.9%

Among filers reporting on Form N-PX. The median is over 3,799 companies with a say-on-pay item reported by 20 or more filers.

How the largest families voted

Meeting of 17 Sep 2025: say-on-pay and each shareholder proposal that could be told apart.

FamilySay-on-payProposal A
VanguardForAgainst
BlackRock and iSharesForAgainst
FidelityForAgainst
DimensionalForAgainst
State Street and SPDRForAgainst
American CenturyAgainst *Against
Franklin TempletonForAgainst
InvescoForAgainst
EquitableForAgainst
Charles SchwabForAgainst
Nuveen and TIAAForFor *
ProShares and ProFundsForAgainst
John Hancock and ManulifeForAgainst
Morgan Stanley, Eaton Vance and CalvertForFor *
J.P. MorganForAgainst
Goldman SachsForAgainst
WisdomTreeForAgainst
PGIM and PrudentialForAgainst
Jackson National fundsForAgainst
Northern Trust and FlexSharesForAgainst
SEIForAgainst
T. Rowe PriceForAgainst
ThriventForAgainst
Lincoln FinancialForAgainst
VoyaForAgainst
First TrustForAgainst
Russell InvestmentsForAgainst
NationwideForAgainst
Victory CapitalForAgainst
Brighthouse FundsForAgainst *
Guggenheim and RydexForAgainst
Columbia ThreadneedleForAgainst
BNY MellonForAgainst
PrincipalForAgainst
Capital Group and American FundsForAgainst
Pacific Life fundsForAgainst
Global XForAgainst
MFSForFor *
TransamericaForAgainst
Federated HermesForAgainst
AllianceBernsteinForAgainst
Hartford FundsForAgainst
DWSForAgainst
PIMCOForAgainst
AllspringForAgainst
MassMutualForAgainst
Harbor FundsForFor *
Macquarie and Delaware FundsForAgainst
Janus HendersonForAgainst
Neuberger BermanForAgainst
Natixis and Loomis SaylesForNo report
BairdForNo report

* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.

By season

SeasonFilers reportingAgainst management on pay, filersBy reported sharesSay-on-pay split
year to 30 June 20241,0047.7%withheld
year to 30 June 20251,0387.1%3.3%
year to 30 June 20261,1054.6%2.0%

Category mix

Share of the vote records reported for this company, by the category filers chose.

CategoryVote recordsShare
DIRECTOR ELECTIONS18,79158.1%
SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTES6,47520.0%
OTHER SOCIAL ISSUES2,1606.7%
AUDIT-RELATED2,0956.5%
ENVIRONMENT OR CLIMATE2,0646.4%
COMPENSATION7302.3%

Questions

How did large funds vote at Darden Restaurants, Inc.?

For the year to 30 June 2026, 1,052 Form N-PX filers reported a say-on-pay vote at Darden Restaurants, Inc.; 48 voted against management (4.6%). The table on this page lists the position of each of the largest fund families on say-on-pay and on each shareholder proposal that could be told apart in the filings.

Were there shareholder proposals at Darden Restaurants, Inc.?

Filers reported one proposal from security holders that could be told apart in the year to 30 June 2026. Across them, 12.9% of reporting filers voted for at the median proposal.

Is this the meeting result?

No. The figures are shares of the funds and managers that file Form N-PX, and of the shares they reported. Holders that do not file the form (individuals, most foreign investors, insiders) are not included, so the split here can differ widely from the certified result, which Darden Restaurants, Inc. reports on Form 8-K.

Where does the data come from?

From Form N-PX filings on the SEC's EDGAR system, grouped by company. Filers type company names and meeting dates themselves; this site groups spellings of the same company and folds meeting dates up to three days apart. Data runs through 23 Sep 2026; the median compares 3,799 companies.

Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings that list Darden Restaurants, Inc., grouped by company. The name is the most common spelling among filers; the ticker and SEC company number come from the SEC company tickers file, matched on the exact name. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 23 Sep 2026; page built 26 Sep 2026.