Vote Scores

Home / Companies / Deere & Company / 28 Feb 2024

Meeting · year to 30 June 20241,599 filers reporting

Deere & Company: meeting of 28 Feb 2024

Votes reported on Form N-PX, item by item

1,599 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the Deere & Company meeting of 28 Feb 2024. Their records fall into 9 items below, in ballot order: management items first, then proposals from security holders. Each bar shows how the reporting filers split; it is not the result of the meeting.

foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management

Items

1

DIRECTOR ELECTIONSIssuer

Director elections

11 nominees; 96.5% of reported votes for; 63 filers withheld from or voted against at least one nominee.

11,054 vote records from 375 filers. 6 of the 370 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 5 filers reported this item without a management mark.

97.1% for1.3% against1.6% other1.6% against management375 filers
2

SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESIssuer

Advisory vote on executive pay (say-on-pay)

2,631 vote records from 1,562 filers. 157 of the 1,511 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 51 filers reported this item without a management mark.

3 filers reported share counts too large to be the holding described. No share split is published for this item. How that is decided

85.9% for10.1% against4.0% other10.4% against management1,562 filers
3

SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESIssuer

Advisory vote on pay tied to a merger or sale

43 vote records from 26 filers. 14 of the 26 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.

34.6% for57.7% against7.7% other53.8% against management26 filers74.1% for22.3% against3.6% other41.9% against management74,504 reported shares
4

AUDIT-RELATEDIssuer

Audit-related items (auditor ratification)

1,002 vote records from 369 filers. 13 of the 365 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 4 filers reported this item without a management mark.

0 filers reported share counts too large to be the holding described. No share split is published for this item. How that is decided

95.1% for3.5% against1.4% other3.6% against management369 filers
5

COMPENSATIONIssuer

COMPENSATION: management items

Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.

111 vote records from 46 filers. 7 of the 42 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 4 filers reported this item without a management mark.

58.7% for26.1% against15.2% other16.7% against management46 filers61.3% for38.2% against0.5% other11.0% against management3,798,097 reported shares, counted once per item in this group
6

DIVERSITY, EQUITY, AND INCLUSIONSecurity holder

Shareholder proposal regarding a civil rights, non-discrimination, and return to merit audit

958 vote records from 352 filers. 23 of the 349 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 3 filers reported this item without a management mark.

0 filers reported share counts too large to be the holding described. No share split is published for this item. How that is decided

2.0% for94.3% against3.7% other6.6% against management352 filers
7

COMPENSATIONSecurity holder

Shareholder proposal regarding shareholder ratification of golden parachutes

901 vote records from 345 filers. 216 of the 341 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 4 filers reported this item without a management mark.

0 filers reported share counts too large to be the holding described. No share split is published for this item. How that is decided

61.7% for37.4% against0.9% other63.3% against management345 filers
8

ENVIRONMENT OR CLIMATESecurity holder

Shareholder proposal regarding a customer and company sustainability congruency report

892 vote records from 337 filers. 23 of the 333 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 4 filers reported this item without a management mark.

0 filers reported share counts too large to be the holding described. No share split is published for this item. How that is decided

3.6% for93.5% against3.0% other6.9% against management337 filers
9

Several categoriesSecurity holder

Shareholder proposals (not separable from the filings)

Filers described these proposals in wordings that could not be matched to one another, so they are shown together.

179 vote records from 36 filers. 12 of the 35 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 1 filer reported this item without a management mark.

19.4% for58.3% against22.2% other34.3% against management36 filers0.7% for99.1% against0.2% other1.2% against management12,166,452 reported shares, counted once per item in this group

How the largest families voted

Family1. Directors2. Say-on-pay4. Auditor6. Proposal7. Proposal8. Proposal
VanguardForForForAgainstAgainstAgainst
BlackRock and iSharesForForForAgainstNo reportNo report
FidelityForForForAgainstAgainstAgainst
DimensionalForForForAgainstFor *Against
State Street and SPDRForForForAgainstFor *Against
American CenturyForForForAgainstFor *Against
Franklin TempletonForForForAgainstAgainstAgainst
InvescoForForForAgainstFor *Against
EquitableForForForAgainstFor *Against
Charles SchwabForForForAgainstFor *Against
Nuveen and TIAAForForForAgainstAgainstAgainst
ProShares and ProFundsForForForAgainstFor *Against
John Hancock and ManulifeForForForAgainstAgainstAgainst
Morgan Stanley, Eaton Vance and CalvertForForForAgainstFor *Against
J.P. MorganForForForAgainstAgainstAgainst
Goldman SachsForForForAgainstAgainstAgainst
WisdomTreeForForForAgainstAgainstAgainst
PGIM and PrudentialForForForAgainstFor *Against
Jackson National fundsForForForAgainstAgainstAgainst
Northern Trust and FlexSharesForForForAgainstFor *Against
SEIForForForAgainstFor *Against
T. Rowe PriceForForForAgainstAgainstAgainst
ThriventForForForAgainstFor *Against
Lincoln FinancialForForForAgainstAgainstAgainst
VoyaForForForAgainstFor *Against
First TrustForForForAgainstFor *Against
Russell InvestmentsForForForAgainstFor *Against
NationwideForForForAgainstFor *Against
Victory CapitalForForForAgainstFor *Against
Brighthouse FundsForForForAgainstFor *Against
Guggenheim and RydexForForForAgainstFor *Against
Columbia ThreadneedleForForForAgainstFor *Against
BNY MellonForForForAgainstAgainstAgainst
PrincipalForForForAgainstFor *Against
Capital Group and American FundsForForForAgainstAgainstAgainst
Pacific Life fundsForForForAgainstAgainstAgainst
Global XForForForNo reportNo reportNo report
TransamericaForForForAgainstAgainstAgainst
Federated HermesForForForAgainstFor *Against
AllianceBernsteinForForForAgainstFor *Against
Hartford FundsForForForAgainstAgainstAgainst
DWSForForForAgainstFor *Against
PIMCOForForAgainst *AgainstFor *Against
AllspringForForForAgainstFor *Against
MassMutualForForForAgainstFor *Against
Harbor FundsForForForAgainstAgainstAgainst
VirtusForForForAgainstAgainstAgainst
VanEckForForForAgainstFor *Against
Macquarie and Delaware FundsNo reportForNo reportNo reportNo reportNo report
Janus HendersonForForForAgainstAgainstAgainst
Neuberger BermanForForForAgainstFor *Against
Natixis and Loomis SaylesForForForAgainstFor *Against
Lord AbbettNo reportForNo reportNo reportNo reportNo report
Dodge & CoxNo reportForNo reportNo reportNo reportNo report
Harris Associates and OakmarkNo reportForNo reportNo reportNo reportNo report
BairdNo reportForNo reportNo reportNo reportNo report

* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.

Questions

How did large funds vote at the Deere & Company meeting?

1,599 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the meeting of 28 Feb 2024. On say-on-pay, 157 of 1,511 voted against management (10.4%). 3 proposals from security holders could be told apart in the filings. The family table lists each of the largest families item by item.

Is this the meeting result?

No. These are the votes of funds and managers that file Form N-PX, counted by filer and by the shares they reported. The certified result, which includes every shareholder, is reported by Deere & Company on Form 8-K.

Why are director elections shown as counts only?

Director records name the nominee. This site does not publish pages or rows about individuals, so for director elections it keeps the number of nominees and the split of votes and discards the wording.

Every meeting on file for Deere & Company

Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings listing Deere & Company with a meeting date within three days of 28 Feb 2024. Proposal titles are the most common wording among filers and are replaced by the SEC category where a wording could name a person. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 23 Sep 2026.