Vote Scores

Home / Companies / Eastman Chemical Company / 7 May 2026

Meeting · year to 30 June 2026763 filers reporting

Eastman Chemical Company: meeting of 7 May 2026

Votes reported on Form N-PX, item by item

763 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the Eastman Chemical Company meeting of 7 May 2026. Their records fall into 6 items below, in ballot order: management items first, then proposals from security holders. Each bar shows how the reporting filers split; it is not the result of the meeting.

foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management

Items

1

DIRECTOR ELECTIONSIssuer

Director elections

11 nominees; 90.6% of reported votes for; 32 filers withheld from or voted against at least one nominee.

4,192 vote records from 161 filers. 6 of the 160 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 1 filer reported this item without a management mark.

96.3% for2.5% against1.2% other3.8% against management161 filers
2

SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESIssuer

Advisory vote on executive pay (say-on-pay)

1,108 vote records from 759 filers. 209 of the 734 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 25 filers reported this item without a management mark.

68.0% for28.2% against3.8% other28.5% against management759 filers80.3% for19.7% against0.0% other19.6% against management117,474,395 reported shares
3

AUDIT-RELATEDIssuer

Audit-related items (auditor ratification)

381 vote records from 160 filers. 5 of the 159 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 1 filer reported this item without a management mark.

96.9% for1.9% against1.3% other3.1% against management160 filers99.8% for0.1% against0.0% other0.3% against management49,703,750 reported shares
4

COMPENSATIONIssuer

COMPENSATION: management items

Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.

405 vote records from 168 filers. 16 of the 166 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 2 filers reported this item without a management mark.

89.9% for9.5% against0.6% other9.6% against management168 filers93.5% for6.5% against0.0% other6.7% against management49,760,653 reported shares, counted once per item in this group
5

CORPORATE GOVERNANCESecurity holder

Advisory Vote on Stockholder Proposal Regarding Lowering the Threshold for Calling Special Shareholder...

375 vote records from 156 filers. 70 of the 155 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 1 filer reported this item without a management mark.

42.9% for55.1% against1.9% other45.2% against management156 filers7.5% for92.5% against0.1% other7.4% against management49,693,721 reported shares
6

Several categoriesSecurity holder

Shareholder proposals (not separable from the filings)

Filers described these proposals in wordings that could not be matched to one another, so they are shown together.

1 vote records from 1 filers. 0 of the 1 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.

0.0% for100.0% against0.0% against management1 filers0.0% for100.0% against0.0% against management300 reported shares, counted once per item in this group

How the largest families voted

Family1. Directors2. Say-on-pay3. Auditor5. Proposal
VanguardForForForAgainst
BlackRock and iSharesForForForAgainst
FidelityForForForAgainst
DimensionalForAgainst *ForAgainst
State Street and SPDRForForForAgainst
American CenturyForForForFor *
Franklin TempletonForForForAgainst
InvescoForForForAgainst
EquitableForForForFor *
Charles SchwabForAgainst *ForAgainst
Nuveen and TIAAForAgainst *ForAgainst
ProShares and ProFundsForForForFor *
John Hancock and ManulifeForAgainst *ForAgainst
Morgan Stanley, Eaton Vance and CalvertForAgainst *ForFor *
J.P. MorganForAgainst *ForAgainst
Goldman SachsForForForAgainst
WisdomTreeForForForAgainst
PGIM and PrudentialForAgainst *ForFor *
Jackson National fundsForForForAgainst
Northern Trust and FlexSharesForForForAgainst
SEIForAgainst *ForFor *
T. Rowe PriceForForForAgainst
ThriventForForForAgainst
Lincoln FinancialForAgainst *ForAgainst
VoyaForForForAgainst
First TrustForForForFor *
Russell InvestmentsForAgainst *ForFor *
Victory CapitalForForForFor *
Brighthouse FundsForForForAgainst *
Guggenheim and RydexForForForFor *
Columbia ThreadneedleForForForFor *
BNY MellonForForForAgainst
PrincipalForForForFor *
Capital Group and American FundsForForForAgainst
Pacific Life fundsForForForAgainst
Global XForAgainst *ForFor *
MFSForForForAgainst
Federated HermesForForForFor *
AllianceBernsteinForForForFor *
DWSNo reportForNo reportNo report
PIMCOForForForFor *
AllspringForForForAgainst
MassMutualNo reportForNo reportNo report
Harbor FundsForForForFor *
Neuberger BermanNo reportAgainst *No reportNo report
Natixis and Loomis SaylesNo reportForNo reportNo report
BairdNo reportForNo reportNo report

* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.

Questions

How did large funds vote at the Eastman Chemical Company meeting?

763 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the meeting of 7 May 2026. On say-on-pay, 209 of 734 voted against management (28.5%). One proposal from security holders could be told apart in the filings. The family table lists each of the largest families item by item.

Is this the meeting result?

No. These are the votes of funds and managers that file Form N-PX, counted by filer and by the shares they reported. The certified result, which includes every shareholder, is reported by Eastman Chemical Company on Form 8-K.

Why are director elections shown as counts only?

Director records name the nominee. This site does not publish pages or rows about individuals, so for director elections it keeps the number of nominees and the split of votes and discards the wording.

Every meeting on file for Eastman Chemical Company

Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings listing Eastman Chemical Company with a meeting date within three days of 7 May 2026. Proposal titles are the most common wording among filers and are replaced by the SEC category where a wording could name a person. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 23 Sep 2026.