Home / Companies / Equitable Holdings, Inc. / 21 May 2025
Equitable Holdings, Inc.: meeting of 21 May 2025
Votes reported on Form N-PX, item by item
746 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the Equitable Holdings, Inc. meeting of 21 May 2025. Their records fall into 9 items below, in ballot order: management items first, then proposals from security holders. Each bar shows how the reporting filers split; it is not the result of the meeting.
foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management
Items
DIRECTOR ELECTIONSIssuer
Director elections
10 nominees; 97.1% of reported votes for; 25 filers withheld from or voted against at least one nominee.
5,634 vote records from 240 filers. 2 of the 239 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 1 filer reported this item without a management mark.
SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESIssuer
Advisory vote on executive pay (say-on-pay)
1,221 vote records from 737 filers. 61 of the 710 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 27 filers reported this item without a management mark.
SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESIssuer
Frequency of the say-on-pay vote
1: 3 filers; one year: 663 filers; three years: 15 filers; for: 11 filers; 1-year: 6 filers; not applicable: 3 filers.
1,197 vote records from 729 filers. 21 of the 700 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 29 filers reported this item without a management mark.
AUDIT-RELATEDIssuer
Audit-related items (auditor ratification)
560 vote records from 240 filers. 3 of the 239 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 1 filer reported this item without a management mark.
SHAREHOLDER RIGHTS AND DEFENSESIssuer
SHAREHOLDER RIGHTS AND DEFENSES: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
85 vote records from 46 filers. 4 of the 45 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 1 filer reported this item without a management mark.
COMPENSATIONIssuer
COMPENSATION: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
586 vote records from 243 filers. 11 of the 242 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 1 filer reported this item without a management mark.
CORPORATE GOVERNANCEIssuer
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
999 vote records from 236 filers. 12 of the 235 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 1 filer reported this item without a management mark.
CORPORATE GOVERNANCESecurity holder
Vote on a stockholder proposal regarding stockholders ability to call a special shareholder meeting.
542 vote records from 233 filers. 98 of the 232 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 1 filer reported this item without a management mark.
Several categoriesSecurity holder
Shareholder proposals (not separable from the filings)
Filers described these proposals in wordings that could not be matched to one another, so they are shown together.
2 vote records from 2 filers. 1 of the 2 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
How the largest families voted
| Family | 1. Directors | 2. Say-on-pay | 3. Pay-vote frequency | 4. Auditor | 8. Proposal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vanguard | For | For | Split or no vote | For | Against |
| BlackRock and iShares | For | For | Split or no vote | For | Against |
| Fidelity | For | For | Split or no vote | For | Against |
| Dimensional | For | For | Split or no vote * | For | Against |
| State Street and SPDR | For | For | Split or no vote | For | Against |
| American Century | For | Against * | Split or no vote | For | For * |
| Franklin Templeton | For | For | Split or no vote | For | Against |
| Invesco | For | For | Split or no vote | For | For * |
| Equitable | For | For | Split or no vote | For | Against |
| Charles Schwab | For | For | Split or no vote | For | Against |
| Nuveen and TIAA | For | For | Split or no vote | For | Against |
| ProShares and ProFunds | For | For | Split or no vote | For | For * |
| John Hancock and Manulife | For | For | Split or no vote | For | For * |
| Morgan Stanley, Eaton Vance and Calvert | For | For | Split or no vote | For | For * |
| J.P. Morgan | For | For | Split or no vote | For | Against |
| Goldman Sachs | For | For | Split or no vote | For | Against |
| WisdomTree | For | Against * | Split or no vote | For | For * |
| PGIM and Prudential | For | For | Split or no vote | For | Against |
| Jackson National funds | For | Against * | Split or no vote | For | For * |
| Northern Trust and FlexShares | For | For | Split or no vote | For | For * |
| SEI | For | For | Split or no vote | For | Against |
| T. Rowe Price | For | For | Split or no vote | For | Against |
| Thrivent | For | For | Split or no vote | For | Against |
| Lincoln Financial | For | For | Split or no vote | For | Against |
| Voya | For | For | Split or no vote | For | For * |
| First Trust | For | For | Split or no vote | For | For * |
| Russell Investments | For | For | Split or no vote | For | Against |
| Nationwide | For | For | Split or no vote | For | Against |
| Victory Capital | For | For | Split or no vote | For | For * |
| Brighthouse Funds | For | For | Split or no vote | For | Against |
| Guggenheim and Rydex | For | For | Split or no vote | For | For * |
| Columbia Threadneedle | For | Against * | Split or no vote | For | For * |
| BNY Mellon | For | Against * | Split or no vote | For | For * |
| Principal | For | For | Split or no vote | For | Against |
| Capital Group and American Funds | For | For | Split or no vote | For | For * |
| Pacific Life funds | For | For | Split or no vote | For | Against |
| MFS | For | For | Split or no vote | For | Against |
| Transamerica | For | For | Split or no vote | For | Against |
| Federated Hermes | For | For | Split or no vote | For | For * |
| AllianceBernstein | For | For | Split or no vote | For | Against |
| Hartford Funds | For | For | Split or no vote | For | Against |
| DWS | No report | For | Split or no vote | No report | No report |
| PIMCO | For | For | Split or no vote | For | For * |
| Allspring | For | For | Split or no vote | For | Against |
| MassMutual | For | For | Split or no vote | For | Against |
| Harbor Funds | For | For | Split or no vote | For | For * |
| Virtus | For | For | Split or no vote | For | Against |
| Macquarie and Delaware Funds | No report | For | Split or no vote | No report | No report |
| Janus Henderson | For | For | Split or no vote | For | For * |
| Neuberger Berman | For | For | Split or no vote | For | Against |
| Natixis and Loomis Sayles | For | For | Split or no vote | For | Against |
| Baird | No report | For | Split or no vote | No report | No report |
* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.
Questions
How did large funds vote at the Equitable Holdings, Inc. meeting?
746 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the meeting of 21 May 2025. On say-on-pay, 61 of 710 voted against management (8.6%). One proposal from security holders could be told apart in the filings. The family table lists each of the largest families item by item.
Is this the meeting result?
No. These are the votes of funds and managers that file Form N-PX, counted by filer and by the shares they reported. The certified result, which includes every shareholder, is reported by Equitable Holdings, Inc. on Form 8-K.
Why are director elections shown as counts only?
Director records name the nominee. This site does not publish pages or rows about individuals, so for director elections it keeps the number of nominees and the split of votes and discards the wording.
Every meeting on file for Equitable Holdings, Inc.
Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings listing Equitable Holdings, Inc. with a meeting date within three days of 21 May 2025. Proposal titles are the most common wording among filers and are replaced by the SEC category where a wording could name a person. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 30 Sep 2026.