Home / Companies / Equitrans Midstream Corporation / 23 Apr 2024
Equitrans Midstream Corporation: meeting of 23 Apr 2024
Votes reported on Form N-PX, item by item
517 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the Equitrans Midstream Corporation meeting of 23 Apr 2024. Their records fall into 5 items below, in ballot order: management items first, then proposals from security holders. Each bar shows how the reporting filers split; it is not the result of the meeting.
foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management
Items
DIRECTOR ELECTIONSIssuer
Director elections
8 nominees; 92.2% of reported votes for; 28 filers withheld from or voted against at least one nominee.
3,006 vote records from 188 filers. 1 of the 186 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 2 filers reported this item without a management mark.
SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESIssuer
Advisory vote on executive pay (say-on-pay)
780 vote records from 509 filers. 352 of the 493 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 16 filers reported this item without a management mark.
0 filers reported share counts too large to be the holding described. No share split is published for this item. How that is decided
AUDIT-RELATEDIssuer
Audit-related items (auditor ratification)
374 vote records from 186 filers. 2 of the 184 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 2 filers reported this item without a management mark.
COMPENSATIONIssuer
COMPENSATION: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
384 vote records from 192 filers. 8 of the 190 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 2 filers reported this item without a management mark.
CORPORATE GOVERNANCEIssuer
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
373 vote records from 184 filers. 25 of the 182 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 2 filers reported this item without a management mark.
How the largest families voted
| Family | 1. Directors | 2. Say-on-pay | 3. Auditor |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vanguard | For | Against * | For |
| BlackRock and iShares | For | Against * | For |
| Fidelity | For | For | For |
| Dimensional | For | Against * | For |
| State Street and SPDR | For | For | For |
| American Century | For | Against * | For |
| Franklin Templeton | For | Against * | For |
| Invesco | For | Against * | For |
| Equitable | For | Against * | For |
| Charles Schwab | For | Against * | For |
| Nuveen and TIAA | For | Against * | For |
| ProShares and ProFunds | For | Against * | For |
| John Hancock and Manulife | For | Against * | For |
| Morgan Stanley, Eaton Vance and Calvert | For | Against * | For |
| J.P. Morgan | For | Against * | For |
| Goldman Sachs | For | Against * | For |
| WisdomTree | For | Against * | For |
| PGIM and Prudential | For | Against * | For |
| Jackson National funds | For | Against * | For |
| Northern Trust and FlexShares | For | For | For |
| SEI | For | Against * | For |
| T. Rowe Price | For | Against * | For |
| Thrivent | For | Against * | For |
| Lincoln Financial | For | For | For |
| Voya | For | Against * | For |
| First Trust | For | Against * | For |
| Russell Investments | For | Against * | For |
| Nationwide | For | Against * | For |
| Victory Capital | For | Against * | For |
| Brighthouse Funds | For | Against * | For |
| Guggenheim and Rydex | For | Against * | For |
| Columbia Threadneedle | For | Against * | For |
| BNY Mellon | For | Against * | For |
| Principal | For | Against * | For |
| Capital Group and American Funds | For | For | For |
| Pacific Life funds | For | Against * | For |
| Global X | For | Against * | For |
| Transamerica | For | Against * | For |
| Federated Hermes | For | For | For |
| AllianceBernstein | For | Against * | For |
| DWS | For | Against * | For |
| PIMCO | For | Against * | For |
| MassMutual | For | Against * | For |
| Harbor Funds | For | For | For |
| VanEck | For | Against * | For |
| Janus Henderson | No report | Against * | No report |
| Neuberger Berman | No report | Against * | No report |
| American Beacon | For | Against * | For |
| Natixis and Loomis Sayles | No report | Against * | No report |
| Lord Abbett | No report | Against * | No report |
| Cohen & Steers | For | Against * | For |
| Baird | No report | Against * | No report |
* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.
Questions
How did large funds vote at the Equitrans Midstream Corporation meeting?
517 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the meeting of 23 Apr 2024. On say-on-pay, 352 of 493 voted against management (71.4%). The family table lists each of the largest families item by item.
Is this the meeting result?
No. These are the votes of funds and managers that file Form N-PX, counted by filer and by the shares they reported. The certified result, which includes every shareholder, is reported by Equitrans Midstream Corporation on Form 8-K.
Why are director elections shown as counts only?
Director records name the nominee. This site does not publish pages or rows about individuals, so for director elections it keeps the number of nominees and the split of votes and discards the wording.
Every meeting on file for Equitrans Midstream Corporation
Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings listing Equitrans Midstream Corporation with a meeting date within three days of 23 Apr 2024. Proposal titles are the most common wording among filers and are replaced by the SEC category where a wording could name a person. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 23 Sep 2026.