Home / Companies / Expeditors International of Washington, Inc. / 7 May 2024
Expeditors International of Washington, Inc.: meeting of 7 May 2024
Votes reported on Form N-PX, item by item
964 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the Expeditors International of Washington, Inc. meeting of 7 May 2024. Their records fall into 8 items below, in ballot order: management items first, then proposals from security holders. Each bar shows how the reporting filers split; it is not the result of the meeting.
foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management
Items
DIRECTOR ELECTIONSIssuer
Director elections
9 nominees; 95.2% of reported votes for; 30 filers withheld from or voted against at least one nominee.
6,825 vote records from 276 filers. 3 of the 274 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 2 filers reported this item without a management mark.
One filer reported a share count too large to be the holding described. No share split is published for this item. How that is decided
SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESIssuer
Advisory vote on executive pay (say-on-pay)
1,630 vote records from 944 filers. 190 of the 914 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 30 filers reported this item without a management mark.
4 filers reported share counts too large to be the holding described. No share split is published for this item. How that is decided
AUDIT-RELATEDIssuer
Audit-related items (auditor ratification)
759 vote records from 275 filers. 9 of the 273 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 2 filers reported this item without a management mark.
One filer reported a share count too large to be the holding described. That figure is left out of the share split below; the count of filers includes it. How that is decided
CAPITAL STRUCTUREIssuer
CAPITAL STRUCTURE: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
97 vote records from 44 filers. 0 of the 44 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
COMPENSATIONIssuer
COMPENSATION: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
704 vote records from 247 filers. 4 of the 245 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 2 filers reported this item without a management mark.
One filer reported a share count too large to be the holding described. No share split is published for this item. How that is decided
DIVERSITY, EQUITY, AND INCLUSIONSecurity holder
Shareholder Proposal: Regarding Report on Effectiveness of DEI Efforts
738 vote records from 267 filers. 114 of the 266 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 1 filer reported this item without a management mark.
One filer reported a share count too large to be the holding described. That figure is left out of the share split below; the count of filers includes it. How that is decided
ENVIRONMENT OR CLIMATESecurity holder
Shareholder Proposal: Regarding Establishment of Near- and Long- Term Science-Based Greenhouse Gas...
738 vote records from 267 filers. 60 of the 266 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 1 filer reported this item without a management mark.
One filer reported a share count too large to be the holding described. That figure is left out of the share split below; the count of filers includes it. How that is decided
Several categoriesSecurity holder
Shareholder proposals (not separable from the filings)
Filers described these proposals in wordings that could not be matched to one another, so they are shown together.
5 vote records from 4 filers. 2 of the 4 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
How the largest families voted
| Family | 1. Directors | 2. Say-on-pay | 3. Auditor | 6. Proposal | 7. Proposal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vanguard | For | For | For | Against | Against |
| BlackRock and iShares | For | For | For | Against | Against |
| Fidelity | For | For | For | Against | Against |
| Dimensional | For | Against * | For | Against | Against |
| State Street and SPDR | For | For | For | Against | Against |
| American Century | For | For | For | Against | Against |
| Franklin Templeton | For | For | For | For * | For * |
| Invesco | For | For | For | Against | Against |
| Equitable | For | For | For | Against | Against |
| Charles Schwab | For | For | For | Against | Against |
| Nuveen and TIAA | For | For | For | For * | Against |
| ProShares and ProFunds | For | For | For | For * | Against |
| John Hancock and Manulife | For | For | For | For * | Against |
| Morgan Stanley, Eaton Vance and Calvert | For | For | For | For * | For * |
| J.P. Morgan | For | For | For | Against | Against |
| Goldman Sachs | For | For | For | Against | Against |
| WisdomTree | For | Against * | For | Against | Against |
| PGIM and Prudential | For | Against * | For | Against | Against |
| Jackson National funds | For | Against * | For | Against | Against |
| Northern Trust and FlexShares | For | For | For | For * | Against |
| SEI | For | Against * | For | Against | Against |
| T. Rowe Price | For | For | For | Against | Against |
| Thrivent | For | For | For | Against | For * |
| Lincoln Financial | For | For | For | Against | Against |
| Voya | For | For | For | For * | Against |
| First Trust | For | For | For | Against | Against |
| Russell Investments | For | Against * | For | Against | Against |
| Nationwide | For | For | For | For * | Against |
| Victory Capital | For | For | For | For * | For * |
| Brighthouse Funds | For | For | For | Against * | Against * |
| Guggenheim and Rydex | For | For | For | For * | Against |
| Columbia Threadneedle | For | For | For | For * | For * |
| BNY Mellon | For | Against * | For | Against | Against |
| Principal | For | For | For | For * | Against |
| Capital Group and American Funds | No report | Split or no vote | No report | No report | No report |
| Pacific Life funds | For | For | For | Against | Against |
| Global X | For | Against * | Against * | No report | No report |
| Transamerica | For | For | For | Against | Against |
| Federated Hermes | For | For | For | Against | Against |
| AllianceBernstein | For | For | For | For * | Against |
| Hartford Funds | For | For | For | Against | Against |
| DWS | For | For | For | For * | For * |
| PIMCO | For | For | Against * | For * | For * |
| Allspring | For | For | For | For * | Against |
| MassMutual | For | For | For | Against | Against |
| Virtus | For | For | For | For * | Against |
| Macquarie and Delaware Funds | For | For | For | For * | For * |
| Janus Henderson | No report | For | No report | No report | No report |
| Neuberger Berman | No report | Against * | No report | No report | No report |
| Natixis and Loomis Sayles | For | For | For | Against | Against |
| Lord Abbett | For | For | For | For * | Against |
| Baird | No report | For | No report | No report | No report |
| Artisan Partners | For | For | For | For * | Against |
* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.
Questions
How did large funds vote at the Expeditors International of Washington, Inc. meeting?
964 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the meeting of 7 May 2024. On say-on-pay, 190 of 914 voted against management (20.8%). 2 proposals from security holders could be told apart in the filings. The family table lists each of the largest families item by item.
Is this the meeting result?
No. These are the votes of funds and managers that file Form N-PX, counted by filer and by the shares they reported. The certified result, which includes every shareholder, is reported by Expeditors International of Washington, Inc. on Form 8-K.
Why are director elections shown as counts only?
Director records name the nominee. This site does not publish pages or rows about individuals, so for director elections it keeps the number of nominees and the split of votes and discards the wording.
Every meeting on file for Expeditors International of Washington, Inc.
Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings listing Expeditors International of Washington, Inc. with a meeting date within three days of 7 May 2024. Proposal titles are the most common wording among filers and are replaced by the SEC category where a wording could name a person. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 23 Sep 2026.