Home / Companies / EXXON MOBIL CORPORATION / 29 May 2024
EXXON MOBIL CORPORATION: meeting of 29 May 2024
Votes reported on Form N-PX, item by item
2,020 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the EXXON MOBIL CORPORATION meeting of 29 May 2024. Their records fall into 9 items below, in ballot order: management items first, then proposals from security holders. Each bar shows how the reporting filers split; it is not the result of the meeting.
foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management
Items
DIRECTOR ELECTIONSIssuer
Director elections
12 nominees; 93.4% of reported votes for; 132 filers withheld from or voted against at least one nominee.
17,016 vote records from 505 filers. 10 of the 501 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 4 filers reported this item without a management mark.
One filer reported a share count too large to be the holding described. No share split is published for this item. How that is decided
SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESIssuer
Advisory vote on executive pay (say-on-pay)
4,650 vote records from 1,967 filers. 184 of the 1,908 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 59 filers reported this item without a management mark.
4 filers reported share counts too large to be the holding described. Those figures are left out of the share split below; the counts of filers include them. How that is decided
AUDIT-RELATEDIssuer
Audit-related items (auditor ratification)
1,410 vote records from 496 filers. 12 of the 492 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 4 filers reported this item without a management mark.
One filer reported a share count too large to be the holding described. That figure is left out of the share split below; the count of filers includes it. How that is decided
COMPENSATIONIssuer
COMPENSATION: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
142 vote records from 51 filers. 8 of the 51 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
ENVIRONMENT OR CLIMATESecurity holder
Revisit Executive Pay Incentives for GHG Emission Reductions
1,321 vote records from 482 filers. 30 of the 480 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 2 filers reported this item without a management mark.
One filer reported a share count too large to be the holding described. That figure is left out of the share split below; the count of filers includes it. How that is decided
OTHER SOCIAL ISSUESSecurity holder
Additional Social Impact Report
1,350 vote records from 478 filers. 77 of the 475 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 3 filers reported this item without a management mark.
One filer reported a share count too large to be the holding described. That figure is left out of the share split below; the count of filers includes it. How that is decided
DIVERSITY, EQUITY, AND INCLUSIONSecurity holder
Additional Pay Report on Gender and Racial Basis
1,316 vote records from 476 filers. 150 of the 473 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 3 filers reported this item without a management mark.
One filer reported a share count too large to be the holding described. That figure is left out of the share split below; the count of filers includes it. How that is decided
ENVIRONMENT OR CLIMATESecurity holder
Shareholder proposal: ENVIRONMENT OR CLIMATE
1,245 vote records from 460 filers. 160 of the 458 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 2 filers reported this item without a management mark.
One filer reported a share count too large to be the holding described. That figure is left out of the share split below; the count of filers includes it. How that is decided
Several categoriesSecurity holder
Shareholder proposals (not separable from the filings)
Filers described these proposals in wordings that could not be matched to one another, so they are shown together.
230 vote records from 36 filers. 8 of the 36 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
How the largest families voted
| Family | 1. Directors | 2. Say-on-pay | 3. Auditor | 5. Proposal | 6. Proposal | 7. Proposal | 8. Proposal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vanguard | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| BlackRock and iShares | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | No report |
| Fidelity | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Dimensional | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| State Street and SPDR | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| American Century | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Franklin Templeton | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Invesco | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Equitable | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Charles Schwab | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Nuveen and TIAA | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | For * |
| ProShares and ProFunds | For | For | For | Against | Against | For * | For * |
| John Hancock and Manulife | For | For | For | Against | Against | For * | For * |
| Morgan Stanley, Eaton Vance and Calvert | For | Against * | For | Against | Against | For * | For * |
| J.P. Morgan | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Goldman Sachs | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| WisdomTree | For | Against * | For | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| PGIM and Prudential | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Jackson National funds | For | Against * | For | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Northern Trust and FlexShares | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | For * |
| SEI | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| T. Rowe Price | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Thrivent | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Lincoln Financial | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Voya | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | For * |
| First Trust | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Russell Investments | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | For * |
| Nationwide | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Victory Capital | For | For | For | Against | For * | For * | For * |
| Brighthouse Funds | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Guggenheim and Rydex | For | For | For | Against | Against | For * | For * |
| Columbia Threadneedle | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| BNY Mellon | For | Against * | For | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Principal | For | For | For | Against | Against | For * | For * |
| Capital Group and American Funds | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Pacific Life funds | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Global X | For | For | For | No report | No report | No report | No report |
| MFS | For | For | For | Against | For * | Against | Against |
| Transamerica | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Federated Hermes | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| AllianceBernstein | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Hartford Funds | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| DWS | For | For | For | Against | For * | For * | For * |
| PIMCO | For | Against * | Against * | Against | For * | For * | For * |
| Allspring | For | For | For | Against | Against | For * | Against |
| MassMutual | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| VanEck | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Macquarie and Delaware Funds | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Janus Henderson | No report | For | No report | No report | No report | No report | No report |
| Neuberger Berman | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Natixis and Loomis Sayles | For | For | For | Against | Against | For * | For * |
| Lord Abbett | For | For | For | Against | Against | For * | Against |
| Cohen & Steers | For | For | For | Against | Against | For * | For * |
| Dodge & Cox | No report | For | No report | No report | No report | No report | No report |
| Harris Associates and Oakmark | No report | For | No report | No report | No report | No report | No report |
| Baird | No report | For | No report | No report | No report | No report | No report |
* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.
Questions
How did large funds vote at the EXXON MOBIL CORPORATION meeting?
2,020 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the meeting of 29 May 2024. On say-on-pay, 184 of 1,908 voted against management (9.6%). 4 proposals from security holders could be told apart in the filings. The family table lists each of the largest families item by item.
Is this the meeting result?
No. These are the votes of funds and managers that file Form N-PX, counted by filer and by the shares they reported. The certified result, which includes every shareholder, is reported by EXXON MOBIL CORPORATION on Form 8-K.
Why are director elections shown as counts only?
Director records name the nominee. This site does not publish pages or rows about individuals, so for director elections it keeps the number of nominees and the split of votes and discards the wording.
Every meeting on file for EXXON MOBIL CORPORATION
Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings listing EXXON MOBIL CORPORATION with a meeting date within three days of 29 May 2024. Proposal titles are the most common wording among filers and are replaced by the SEC category where a wording could name a person. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 23 Sep 2026.