Ezaki Glico Co., Ltd.: meeting of 24 Mar 2026

Votes reported on Form N-PX, item by item

38 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the Ezaki Glico Co., Ltd. meeting of 24 Mar 2026. Their records fall into 8 items below, in ballot order: management items first, then proposals from security holders. Each bar shows how the reporting filers split; it is not the result of the meeting.

foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management

Items

DIRECTOR ELECTIONSIssuer

Director elections

8 nominees; 82.5% of reported votes for; 18 filers withheld from or voted against at least one nominee.

464 vote records from 37 filers. 9 of the 37 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.

75.7% for24.3% against24.3% against management37 filers

DIRECTOR ELECTIONSSecurity holder

Director elections (nominees put forward by security holders)

2 nominees; 55.9% of reported votes for; 17 filers withheld from or voted against at least one nominee.

116 vote records from 37 filers. 22 of the 37 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.

59.5% for29.7% against10.8% other59.5% against management37 filers

SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESIssuer

Advisory vote on executive pay (say-on-pay)

3 vote records from 1 filers. 0 of the 1 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.

100.0% for0.0% against0.0% against management1 filers100.0% for0.0% against33.3% against management15,179,400 reported shares

COMPENSATIONIssuer

COMPENSATION: management items

Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.

156 vote records from 37 filers. 0 of the 37 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.

100.0% for0.0% against0.0% against management37 filers88.3% for11.7% against11.7% against management15,588,778 reported shares, counted once per item in this group

CORPORATE GOVERNANCEIssuer

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE: management items

Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.

16 vote records from 7 filers. 0 of the 7 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.

100.0% for0.0% against0.0% against management7 filers100.0% for0.0% against0.0% against management1,105,795 reported shares, counted once per item in this group

CORPORATE GOVERNANCESecurity holder

Amend Articles to Add Provision Concerning Management with Cost of Capital and Share Price Considered

58 vote records from 37 filers. 4 of the 37 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.

10.8% for89.2% against10.8% against management37 filers5.0% for95.0% against5.0% against management5,566,191 reported shares

COMPENSATIONSecurity holder

Approve Restricted Stock Plan

58 vote records from 37 filers. 21 of the 37 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.

56.8% for43.2% against56.8% against management37 filers54.6% for45.4% against54.6% against management5,566,191 reported shares

CAPITAL STRUCTURESecurity holder

Initiate Share Repurchase Program

58 vote records from 37 filers. 28 of the 37 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.

75.7% for24.3% against75.7% against management37 filers58.9% for41.1% against58.9% against management5,566,191 reported shares

How the largest families voted

Family	1. Directors	2. Directors	6. Proposal	7. Proposal	8. Proposal
Vanguard	For	Against	Against	Against	Against
BlackRock and iShares	For	Against	Against	Against	Against
Fidelity	For	Against	Against	Against	For *
Dimensional	For	For *	Against	For *	For *
State Street and SPDR	For	Against	Against	Against	Against
Franklin Templeton	For	For *	Against	For *	For *
Invesco	For	For *	Against	For *	For *
Equitable	Against *	For *	Against	For *	For *
Charles Schwab	For	Split or no vote	For *	Against	For *
Nuveen and TIAA	For	For *	Against	Against	For *
John Hancock and Manulife	For	For *	Against	For *	For *
WisdomTree	For	For *	Against	For *	Against
SEI	For	Split or no vote	For *	Against	For *
Lincoln Financial	For	For *	Against	For *	For *
Brighthouse Funds	For	For *	Against	For *	For *
MFS	Against *	For *	Against	For *	For *
PIMCO	For	For *	Against	For *	For *
Allspring	For	For *	Against	For *	For *

* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.

Questions

How did large funds vote at the Ezaki Glico Co., Ltd. meeting?

38 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the meeting of 24 Mar 2026. On say-on-pay, 0 of 1 voted against management (0.0%). 3 proposals from security holders could be told apart in the filings. The family table lists each of the largest families item by item.

Is this the meeting result?

No. These are the votes of funds and managers that file Form N-PX, counted by filer and by the shares they reported. The certified result, which includes every shareholder, is reported by Ezaki Glico Co., Ltd. on Form 8-K.

Why are director elections shown as counts only?

Director records name the nominee. This site does not publish pages or rows about individuals, so for director elections it keeps the number of nominees and the split of votes and discards the wording.

Every meeting on file for Ezaki Glico Co., Ltd.

Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings listing Ezaki Glico Co., Ltd. with a meeting date within three days of 24 Mar 2026. Proposal titles are the most common wording among filers and are replaced by the SEC category where a wording could name a person. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 23 Sep 2026.