Home / Companies / Fox Corporation / 14 Nov 2025
Fox Corporation: meeting of 14 Nov 2025
Votes reported on Form N-PX, item by item
700 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the Fox Corporation meeting of 14 Nov 2025. Their records fall into 8 items below, in ballot order: management items first, then proposals from security holders. Each bar shows how the reporting filers split; it is not the result of the meeting.
foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management
Items
DIRECTOR ELECTIONSIssuer
Director elections
7 nominees; 62.5% of reported votes for; 152 filers withheld from or voted against at least one nominee.
3,583 vote records from 201 filers. 84 of the 201 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESIssuer
Advisory vote on executive pay (say-on-pay)
1,181 vote records from 693 filers. 75 of the 659 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 34 filers reported this item without a management mark.
SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESIssuer
Frequency of the say-on-pay vote
one year: 615 filers; three years: 18 filers; for: 9 filers; abstain: 5 filers; 1-year: 4 filers; not applicable: 3 filers.
1,170 vote records from 683 filers. 20 of the 648 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 35 filers reported this item without a management mark.
AUDIT-RELATEDIssuer
Audit-related items (auditor ratification)
513 vote records from 201 filers. 2 of the 201 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
COMPENSATIONIssuer
COMPENSATION: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
160 vote records from 56 filers. 5 of the 56 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
CORPORATE GOVERNANCESecurity holder
Simple Majority Vote.
494 vote records from 192 filers. 156 of the 192 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
COMPENSATIONSecurity holder
Improve Executive Compensation Program.
388 vote records from 156 filers. 13 of the 156 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
Several categoriesSecurity holder
Shareholder proposals (not separable from the filings)
Filers described these proposals in wordings that could not be matched to one another, so they are shown together.
8 vote records from 6 filers. 3 of the 6 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
How the largest families voted
| Family | 1. Directors | 2. Say-on-pay | 3. Pay-vote frequency | 4. Auditor | 6. Proposal | 7. Proposal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vanguard | For | For | Split or no vote | For | Against | Against |
| BlackRock and iShares | For | For | Split or no vote | For | Against | No report |
| Fidelity | For | For | Split or no vote | For | For * | Against |
| Dimensional | For | For | Split or no vote * | For | For * | Against |
| State Street and SPDR | For | For | Split or no vote | For | For * | Against |
| American Century | Against * | For | Split or no vote | For | For * | Against |
| Franklin Templeton | Against * | For | Split or no vote | For | For * | Against |
| Invesco | For | For | Split or no vote | For | For * | Against |
| Equitable | For | For | Split or no vote | For | Against | Against |
| Charles Schwab | No report | For | Split or no vote | No report | No report | No report |
| Nuveen and TIAA | Against * | For | Split or no vote | For | For * | Against |
| ProShares and ProFunds | Against * | For | Split or no vote | For | For * | Against |
| John Hancock and Manulife | For | For | Split or no vote | For | For * | No report |
| Morgan Stanley, Eaton Vance and Calvert | Against * | Against * | Split or no vote | For | For * | Against |
| J.P. Morgan | For | For | Split or no vote | For | Against | Against |
| Goldman Sachs | Against * | For | Split or no vote | For | For * | Against |
| WisdomTree | Against * | Against * | Split or no vote | For | For * | Against |
| PGIM and Prudential | For | For | Split or no vote | For | For * | Against |
| Jackson National funds | Against * | Against * | Split or no vote | For | For * | No report |
| Northern Trust and FlexShares | For | For | Split or no vote | For | For * | Against |
| SEI | For | For | Split or no vote | For | For * | Against |
| T. Rowe Price | For | For | Split or no vote | For | For * | Against |
| Thrivent | Against * | For | Split or no vote | For | For * | Against |
| Lincoln Financial | For | For | Split or no vote | For | For * | Against |
| Voya | Against * | For | Split or no vote | For | For * | Against |
| First Trust | No report | For | Split or no vote | No report | No report | No report |
| Russell Investments | For | For | Split or no vote | For | For * | Against |
| Nationwide | For | For | Split or no vote | For | Against | Against |
| Victory Capital | Against * | For | Split or no vote | For | For * | Against |
| Brighthouse Funds | Against | For | For | For | For * | Against * |
| Guggenheim and Rydex | Against * | For | Split or no vote | For | For * | Against |
| Columbia Threadneedle | Against * | For | Split or no vote | For | For * | Against |
| BNY Mellon | Against * | Against * | Split or no vote | For | For * | Against |
| Principal | For | For | Split or no vote | For | For * | Against |
| Pacific Life funds | For | For | Split or no vote | For | Against | Against |
| Global X | For | For | Split or no vote | For | For * | Against |
| Transamerica | Against * | For | Split or no vote | For | For * | Against |
| Federated Hermes | For | For | Split or no vote | For | For * | Against |
| AllianceBernstein | Against * | For | Split or no vote | For | For * | Against |
| Hartford Funds | No report | For | Split or no vote | No report | No report | No report |
| DWS | Against * | For | Split or no vote | For | For * | Against |
| PIMCO | No report | For | Split or no vote | No report | No report | No report |
| Allspring | Against * | For | Split or no vote | For | For * | Against |
| MassMutual | For | For | Split or no vote | For | Against | Against |
| Macquarie and Delaware Funds | No report | For | Split or no vote | No report | No report | No report |
| Janus Henderson | Against * | For | Split or no vote | For | For * | Against |
| Neuberger Berman | No report | For | Split or no vote | No report | No report | No report |
| American Beacon | For | For | No report | For | No report | For * |
| Natixis and Loomis Sayles | No report | For | Split or no vote | No report | No report | No report |
| Dodge & Cox | For | For | Split or no vote | For | For * | Against |
| Baird | No report | For | Split or no vote | No report | No report | No report |
* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.
Questions
How did large funds vote at the Fox Corporation meeting?
700 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the meeting of 14 Nov 2025. On say-on-pay, 75 of 659 voted against management (11.4%). 2 proposals from security holders could be told apart in the filings. The family table lists each of the largest families item by item.
Is this the meeting result?
No. These are the votes of funds and managers that file Form N-PX, counted by filer and by the shares they reported. The certified result, which includes every shareholder, is reported by Fox Corporation on Form 8-K.
Why are director elections shown as counts only?
Director records name the nominee. This site does not publish pages or rows about individuals, so for director elections it keeps the number of nominees and the split of votes and discards the wording.
Every meeting on file for Fox Corporation
Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings listing Fox Corporation with a meeting date within three days of 14 Nov 2025. Proposal titles are the most common wording among filers and are replaced by the SEC category where a wording could name a person. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 23 Sep 2026.