Home / Companies / Huntsman Corporation / 29 Apr 2026
Huntsman Corporation: meeting of 29 Apr 2026
Votes reported on Form N-PX, item by item
424 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the Huntsman Corporation meeting of 29 Apr 2026. Their records fall into 5 items below, in ballot order: management items first, then proposals from security holders. Each bar shows how the reporting filers split; it is not the result of the meeting.
foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management
Items
DIRECTOR ELECTIONSIssuer
Director elections
9 nominees; 89.0% of reported votes for; 32 filers withheld from or voted against at least one nominee.
2,350 vote records from 106 filers. 2 of the 106 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESIssuer
Advisory vote on executive pay (say-on-pay)
662 vote records from 420 filers. 46 of the 398 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 22 filers reported this item without a management mark.
AUDIT-RELATEDIssuer
Audit-related items (auditor ratification)
261 vote records from 106 filers. 2 of the 106 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
COMPENSATIONIssuer
COMPENSATION: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
16 vote records from 9 filers. 5 of the 9 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
CORPORATE GOVERNANCESecurity holder
Stockholder proposal requesting an independent board chair policy.
259 vote records from 104 filers. 42 of the 104 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
How the largest families voted
| Family | 1. Directors | 2. Say-on-pay | 3. Auditor | 5. Proposal |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vanguard | For | For | For | Against |
| BlackRock and iShares | For | For | For | Against |
| Fidelity | For | For | For | Against |
| Dimensional | For | For | For | Against |
| State Street and SPDR | For | For | For | Against |
| American Century | For | Against * | For | Against |
| Franklin Templeton | For | For | For | For * |
| Invesco | For | For | For | Against |
| Equitable | For | For | For | Against |
| Charles Schwab | For | For | For | Against |
| Nuveen and TIAA | For | Against * | For | For * |
| John Hancock and Manulife | For | For | For | Split or no vote |
| Morgan Stanley, Eaton Vance and Calvert | No report | Against * | No report | No report |
| J.P. Morgan | For | Against * | For | For * |
| Goldman Sachs | No report | For | No report | No report |
| PGIM and Prudential | For | For | For | Against |
| Jackson National funds | For | For | For | Against |
| Northern Trust and FlexShares | For | Against * | For | Against |
| SEI | For | For | For | For * |
| T. Rowe Price | For | For | For | Against |
| Thrivent | For | For | For | For * |
| Lincoln Financial | For | For | For | Against * |
| Voya | For | For | For | Against |
| First Trust | For | For | For | For * |
| Russell Investments | For | For | For | For * |
| Victory Capital | For | For | For | For * |
| Guggenheim and Rydex | For | For | For | For * |
| Columbia Threadneedle | For | For | For | For * |
| BNY Mellon | For | For | For | For * |
| Principal | For | For | For | Against |
| Pacific Life funds | For | Against * | For | Against |
| AllianceBernstein | No report | For | No report | No report |
| PIMCO | For | For | For | For * |
| Allspring | No report | Split or no vote | No report | No report |
| MassMutual | No report | For | No report | No report |
| Neuberger Berman | No report | For | No report | No report |
| American Beacon | For | For | For | For * |
| Natixis and Loomis Sayles | No report | For | No report | No report |
| Baird | No report | For | No report | No report |
* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.
Questions
How did large funds vote at the Huntsman Corporation meeting?
424 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the meeting of 29 Apr 2026. On say-on-pay, 46 of 398 voted against management (11.6%). One proposal from security holders could be told apart in the filings. The family table lists each of the largest families item by item.
Is this the meeting result?
No. These are the votes of funds and managers that file Form N-PX, counted by filer and by the shares they reported. The certified result, which includes every shareholder, is reported by Huntsman Corporation on Form 8-K.
Why are director elections shown as counts only?
Director records name the nominee. This site does not publish pages or rows about individuals, so for director elections it keeps the number of nominees and the split of votes and discards the wording.
Every meeting on file for Huntsman Corporation
Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings listing Huntsman Corporation with a meeting date within three days of 29 Apr 2026. Proposal titles are the most common wording among filers and are replaced by the SEC category where a wording could name a person. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 23 Sep 2026.