Home / Companies / Industrial and Commercial Bank of China Limited / 26 Jun 2026
Industrial and Commercial Bank of China Limited: meeting of 26 Jun 2026
Votes reported on Form N-PX, item by item
127 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the Industrial and Commercial Bank of China Limited meeting of 26 Jun 2026. Their records fall into 8 items below, in ballot order: management items first, then proposals from security holders. Each bar shows how the reporting filers split; it is not the result of the meeting.
foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management
Items
DIRECTOR ELECTIONSIssuer
Director elections
1 nominee; 98.1% of reported votes for; 2 filers withheld from or voted against at least one nominee.
108 vote records from 43 filers. 2 of the 43 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
DIRECTOR ELECTIONSSecurity holder
Director elections (nominees put forward by security holders)
1 nominee; 96.8% of reported votes for; 2 filers withheld from or voted against at least one nominee.
189 vote records from 85 filers. 2 of the 84 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 1 filer reported this item without a management mark.
AUDIT-RELATEDIssuer
Audit-related items (auditor ratification)
297 vote records from 127 filers. 1 of the 126 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 1 filer reported this item without a management mark.
COMPENSATIONIssuer
COMPENSATION: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
594 vote records from 127 filers. 0 of the 126 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 1 filer reported this item without a management mark.
CORPORATE GOVERNANCEIssuer
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
277 vote records from 113 filers. 0 of the 112 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 1 filer reported this item without a management mark.
OTHER SOCIAL ISSUESIssuer
OTHER SOCIAL ISSUES: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
296 vote records from 126 filers. 0 of the 125 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 1 filer reported this item without a management mark.
OTHERIssuer
OTHER: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
85 vote records from 14 filers. 0 of the 14 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
Several categoriesSecurity holder
Shareholder proposals (not separable from the filings)
Filers described these proposals in wordings that could not be matched to one another, so they are shown together.
1 vote records from 1 filers. 0 of the 1 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
How the largest families voted
| Family | 1. Directors | 2. Directors | 3. Auditor |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vanguard | No report | For | For |
| BlackRock and iShares | For | No report | For |
| Fidelity | No report | For | For |
| Dimensional | No report | For | For |
| American Century | No report | For | For |
| Franklin Templeton | No report | For | For |
| Invesco | No report | For | For |
| Equitable | No report | For | For |
| Charles Schwab | For | No report | For |
| Nuveen and TIAA | No report | For | For |
| ProShares and ProFunds | No report | For | For |
| John Hancock and Manulife | For | No report | For |
| Morgan Stanley, Eaton Vance and Calvert | No report | For | For |
| J.P. Morgan | Against * | Against * | For |
| Goldman Sachs | For | For | For |
| WisdomTree | No report | For | For |
| PGIM and Prudential | For | No report | For |
| Jackson National funds | For | No report | For |
| Northern Trust and FlexShares | No report | For | For |
| SEI | For | No report | For |
| T. Rowe Price | No report | For | For |
| Thrivent | No report | For | For |
| Lincoln Financial | No report | For | For |
| Voya | No report | For | For |
| First Trust | No report | For | For |
| Russell Investments | For | No report | For |
| Nationwide | No report | For | For |
| Victory Capital | No report | For | For |
| Brighthouse Funds | No report | For | For |
| Columbia Threadneedle | No report | For | For |
| BNY Mellon | No report | For | For |
| Pacific Life funds | No report | For | For |
| MFS | No report | For | For |
| Federated Hermes | Against * | No report | For |
| AllianceBernstein | No report | For | For |
| Hartford Funds | For | No report | For |
| PIMCO | No report | For | For |
| Allspring | No report | For | For |
| Harbor Funds | For | No report | For |
| Virtus | No report | For | For |
| Macquarie and Delaware Funds | No report | For | For |
| Neuberger Berman | For | No report | For |
| Lord Abbett | No report | For | For |
* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.
Questions
How did large funds vote at the Industrial and Commercial Bank of China Limited meeting?
127 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the meeting of 26 Jun 2026. The family table lists each of the largest families item by item.
Is this the meeting result?
No. These are the votes of funds and managers that file Form N-PX, counted by filer and by the shares they reported. The certified result, which includes every shareholder, is reported by Industrial and Commercial Bank of China Limited on Form 8-K.
Why are director elections shown as counts only?
Director records name the nominee. This site does not publish pages or rows about individuals, so for director elections it keeps the number of nominees and the split of votes and discards the wording.
Every meeting on file for Industrial and Commercial Bank of China Limited
Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings listing Industrial and Commercial Bank of China Limited with a meeting date within three days of 26 Jun 2026. Proposal titles are the most common wording among filers and are replaced by the SEC category where a wording could name a person. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 23 Sep 2026.