Home / Companies / Krispy Kreme, Inc. / 10 Jun 2026
Krispy Kreme, Inc.: meeting of 10 Jun 2026
Votes reported on Form N-PX, item by item
230 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the Krispy Kreme, Inc. meeting of 10 Jun 2026. Their records fall into 6 items below, in ballot order: management items first, then proposals from security holders. Each bar shows how the reporting filers split; it is not the result of the meeting.
foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management
Items
DIRECTOR ELECTIONSIssuer
Director elections
8 nominees; 91.3% of reported votes for; 29 filers withheld from or voted against at least one nominee.
1,080 vote records from 66 filers. 0 of the 62 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 4 filers reported this item without a management mark.
SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESIssuer
Advisory vote on executive pay (say-on-pay)
339 vote records from 229 filers. 13 of the 214 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 15 filers reported this item without a management mark.
AUDIT-RELATEDIssuer
Audit-related items (auditor ratification)
135 vote records from 66 filers. 0 of the 62 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 4 filers reported this item without a management mark.
COMPENSATIONIssuer
COMPENSATION: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
141 vote records from 68 filers. 55 of the 64 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 4 filers reported this item without a management mark.
CORPORATE GOVERNANCESecurity holder
To vote on a stockholder proposal requesting that the Company's governing documents be amended to replace...
109 vote records from 55 filers. 49 of the 53 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 2 filers reported this item without a management mark.
Several categoriesSecurity holder
Shareholder proposals (not separable from the filings)
Filers described these proposals in wordings that could not be matched to one another, so they are shown together.
26 vote records from 14 filers. 6 of the 12 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 2 filers reported this item without a management mark.
How the largest families voted
| Family | 1. Directors | 2. Say-on-pay | 3. Auditor | 5. Proposal |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vanguard | For | For | For | For * |
| BlackRock and iShares | For | For | For | No report |
| Fidelity | For | For | For | For * |
| Dimensional | For | For | For | For * |
| State Street and SPDR | For | For | For | For * |
| Invesco | For | Against * | For | For * |
| Equitable | For | For | For | For * |
| Charles Schwab | For | For | For | For * |
| Nuveen and TIAA | For | For | For | For * |
| ProShares and ProFunds | For | For | For | For * |
| John Hancock and Manulife | For | For | For | No report |
| Morgan Stanley, Eaton Vance and Calvert | For | For | For | For * |
| J.P. Morgan | No report | For | No report | No report |
| Goldman Sachs | For | For | For | For * |
| PGIM and Prudential | For | For | For | For * |
| Jackson National funds | Split or no vote | Split or no vote | Split or no vote | No report |
| Northern Trust and FlexShares | Split or no vote | For | Split or no vote | Split or no vote |
| SEI | For | For | For | For * |
| T. Rowe Price | For | For | For | For * |
| Lincoln Financial | For | For | For | For * |
| Voya | For | For | For | For * |
| First Trust | No report | For | No report | No report |
| Russell Investments | No report | For | No report | No report |
| Nationwide | For | For | For | For * |
| Victory Capital | For | For | For | For * |
| Brighthouse Funds | For | For | For | For * |
| Guggenheim and Rydex | For | For | For | For * |
| Columbia Threadneedle | No report | For | No report | No report |
| BNY Mellon | No report | For | No report | No report |
| Principal | For | For | For | For * |
| Pacific Life funds | For | For | For | Against |
| Global X | For | For | For | For * |
| Federated Hermes | For | For | For | For * |
| AllianceBernstein | No report | For | No report | No report |
| DWS | For | For | For | For * |
| Allspring | No report | Split or no vote | No report | No report |
| Neuberger Berman | No report | For | No report | No report |
| Baird | No report | For | No report | No report |
* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.
Questions
How did large funds vote at the Krispy Kreme, Inc. meeting?
230 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the meeting of 10 Jun 2026. On say-on-pay, 13 of 214 voted against management (6.1%). One proposal from security holders could be told apart in the filings. The family table lists each of the largest families item by item.
Is this the meeting result?
No. These are the votes of funds and managers that file Form N-PX, counted by filer and by the shares they reported. The certified result, which includes every shareholder, is reported by Krispy Kreme, Inc. on Form 8-K.
Why are director elections shown as counts only?
Director records name the nominee. This site does not publish pages or rows about individuals, so for director elections it keeps the number of nominees and the split of votes and discards the wording.
Every meeting on file for Krispy Kreme, Inc.
Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings listing Krispy Kreme, Inc. with a meeting date within three days of 10 Jun 2026. Proposal titles are the most common wording among filers and are replaced by the SEC category where a wording could name a person. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 23 Sep 2026.