Home / Companies / Las Vegas Sands Corp. / 15 May 2025
Las Vegas Sands Corp.: meeting of 15 May 2025
Votes reported on Form N-PX, item by item
847 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the Las Vegas Sands Corp. meeting of 15 May 2025. Their records fall into 3 items below, in ballot order: management items first, then proposals from security holders. Each bar shows how the reporting filers split; it is not the result of the meeting.
foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management
Items
DIRECTOR ELECTIONSIssuer
Director elections
9 nominees; 53.9% of reported votes for; 196 filers withheld from or voted against at least one nominee.
5,213 vote records from 252 filers. 101 of the 248 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 4 filers reported this item without a management mark.
SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESIssuer
Advisory vote on executive pay (say-on-pay)
1,300 vote records from 837 filers. 588 of the 810 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 27 filers reported this item without a management mark.
AUDIT-RELATEDIssuer
Audit-related items (auditor ratification)
581 vote records from 252 filers. 2 of the 248 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 4 filers reported this item without a management mark.
How the largest families voted
| Family | 1. Directors | 2. Say-on-pay | 3. Auditor |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vanguard | For | Against * | For |
| BlackRock and iShares | For | Against * | For |
| Fidelity | For | Against * | For |
| Dimensional | Abstain or withhold * | Against * | For |
| State Street and SPDR | For | Against * | For |
| American Century | Abstain or withhold * | Against * | For |
| Franklin Templeton | Abstain or withhold * | Against * | For |
| Invesco | Abstain or withhold * | Against * | For |
| Equitable | Abstain or withhold * | Against * | For |
| Charles Schwab | For | Against * | For |
| Nuveen and TIAA | For | Against * | For |
| ProShares and ProFunds | Abstain or withhold * | Against * | For |
| John Hancock and Manulife | For | Against * | For |
| Morgan Stanley, Eaton Vance and Calvert | Abstain or withhold * | Against * | For |
| J.P. Morgan | Abstain or withhold * | Against * | For |
| Goldman Sachs | For | Against * | For |
| WisdomTree | For | Against * | For |
| PGIM and Prudential | For | Against * | For |
| Jackson National funds | For | Against * | For |
| Northern Trust and FlexShares | For | Against * | For |
| SEI | For | Against * | For |
| T. Rowe Price | Abstain or withhold * | Against * | For |
| Thrivent | Abstain or withhold * | Against * | For |
| Lincoln Financial | Abstain or withhold * | Against * | For |
| Voya | For | Against * | For |
| First Trust | Abstain or withhold * | Against * | For |
| Russell Investments | For | Against * | For |
| Nationwide | For | Against * | For |
| Victory Capital | Abstain or withhold * | Against * | For |
| Brighthouse Funds | Abstain or withhold | Against * | For |
| Guggenheim and Rydex | Abstain or withhold * | Against * | For |
| Columbia Threadneedle | For | Against * | For |
| BNY Mellon | For | Against * | For |
| Principal | For | For | For |
| Capital Group and American Funds | For | Against * | For |
| Pacific Life funds | For | For | For |
| Global X | For | Against * | For |
| MFS | No report | Against * | No report |
| Transamerica | For | Against * | For |
| Federated Hermes | Abstain or withhold * | Against * | For |
| AllianceBernstein | Abstain or withhold * | Against * | For |
| Hartford Funds | For | Against * | For |
| DWS | Abstain or withhold * | Against * | For |
| Allspring | Abstain or withhold * | Against * | For |
| MassMutual | Abstain or withhold * | Against * | For |
| Virtus | Abstain or withhold * | Against * | For |
| VanEck | For | Against * | For |
| Macquarie and Delaware Funds | No report | Against * | No report |
| Janus Henderson | For | For | For |
| Neuberger Berman | For | Against * | For |
| American Beacon | For | For | For |
| Natixis and Loomis Sayles | Abstain or withhold * | Against * | For |
| Dodge & Cox | For | For | For |
| Harris Associates and Oakmark | No report | For | No report |
| Baird | No report | Against * | No report |
* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.
Questions
How did large funds vote at the Las Vegas Sands Corp. meeting?
847 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the meeting of 15 May 2025. On say-on-pay, 588 of 810 voted against management (72.6%). The family table lists each of the largest families item by item.
Is this the meeting result?
No. These are the votes of funds and managers that file Form N-PX, counted by filer and by the shares they reported. The certified result, which includes every shareholder, is reported by Las Vegas Sands Corp. on Form 8-K.
Why are director elections shown as counts only?
Director records name the nominee. This site does not publish pages or rows about individuals, so for director elections it keeps the number of nominees and the split of votes and discards the wording.
Every meeting on file for Las Vegas Sands Corp.
Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings listing Las Vegas Sands Corp. with a meeting date within three days of 15 May 2025. Proposal titles are the most common wording among filers and are replaced by the SEC category where a wording could name a person. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 23 Sep 2026.