Vote Scores

Home / Companies / Las Vegas Sands Corp. / 9 May 2024

Meeting · year to 30 June 2024891 filers reporting

Las Vegas Sands Corp.: meeting of 9 May 2024

Votes reported on Form N-PX, item by item

891 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the Las Vegas Sands Corp. meeting of 9 May 2024. Their records fall into 4 items below, in ballot order: management items first, then proposals from security holders. Each bar shows how the reporting filers split; it is not the result of the meeting.

foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management

Items

1

DIRECTOR ELECTIONSIssuer

Director elections

7 nominees; 53.2% of reported votes for; 242 filers withheld from or voted against at least one nominee.

4,545 vote records from 283 filers. 105 of the 280 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 3 filers reported this item without a management mark.

61.8% for0.4% against37.8% other37.5% against management283 filers
2

SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESIssuer

Advisory vote on executive pay (say-on-pay)

1,412 vote records from 875 filers. 592 of the 845 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 30 filers reported this item without a management mark.

2 filers reported share counts too large to be the holding described. No share split is published for this item. How that is decided

27.2% for68.5% against4.3% other70.1% against management875 filers
3

AUDIT-RELATEDIssuer

Audit-related items (auditor ratification)

653 vote records from 281 filers. 3 of the 279 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 2 filers reported this item without a management mark.

98.2% for0.7% against1.1% other1.1% against management281 filers100.0% for0.0% against0.0% other0.0% against management141,736,786 reported shares
4

COMPENSATIONIssuer

COMPENSATION: management items

Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.

688 vote records from 290 filers. 15 of the 288 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 2 filers reported this item without a management mark.

93.1% for5.2% against1.7% other5.2% against management290 filers92.9% for7.1% against0.0% other7.0% against management142,007,296 reported shares, counted once per item in this group

How the largest families voted

Family1. Directors2. Say-on-pay3. Auditor
VanguardForAgainst *For
BlackRock and iSharesForForFor
FidelityForAgainst *For
DimensionalAbstain or withhold *Against *For
State Street and SPDRAbstain or withhold *Against *For
American CenturyAbstain or withhold *Against *For
Franklin TempletonForAgainst *For
InvescoForAgainst *For
EquitableForAgainst *For
Charles SchwabForAgainst *For
Nuveen and TIAAAbstain or withhold *Against *For
ProShares and ProFundsAbstain or withhold *Against *For
John Hancock and ManulifeForAgainst *For
Morgan Stanley, Eaton Vance and CalvertForAgainst *For
J.P. MorganAbstain or withhold *Against *For
Goldman SachsForAgainst *For
WisdomTreeForAgainst *For
PGIM and PrudentialForAgainst *For
Jackson National fundsForAgainst *For
Northern Trust and FlexSharesForAgainst *For
SEIForAgainst *For
T. Rowe PriceForAgainst *For
ThriventAbstain or withhold *Against *For
Lincoln FinancialForAgainst *For
VoyaForAgainst *For
First TrustAbstain or withhold *Against *For
Russell InvestmentsForAgainst *For
NationwideForAgainst *For
Victory CapitalAbstain or withhold *Against *For
Brighthouse FundsForAgainst *For
Guggenheim and RydexAbstain or withhold *Against *For
Columbia ThreadneedleForAgainst *For
BNY MellonForAgainst *For
PrincipalForForFor
Capital Group and American FundsForAgainst *For
Pacific Life fundsForAgainst *For
Global XForAgainst *For
MFSAbstain or withhold *Against *For
TransamericaAbstain or withhold *Against *For
Federated HermesAbstain or withhold *Against *For
AllianceBernsteinAbstain or withhold *Against *For
Hartford FundsForAgainst *For
DWSAbstain or withhold *Against *For
PIMCOAbstain or withhold *Against *Against *
AllspringAbstain or withhold *Against *For
MassMutualForAgainst *For
VirtusAbstain or withhold *Against *For
VanEckForAgainst *For
Macquarie and Delaware FundsForAgainst *For
Janus HendersonForAgainst *For
Neuberger BermanForAgainst *For
American BeaconForForFor
Natixis and Loomis SaylesNo reportAgainst *No report
Lord AbbettNo reportAgainst *No report
Dodge & CoxAbstain or withhold *ForFor
Harris Associates and OakmarkNo reportForNo report
BairdNo reportAgainst *No report

* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.

Questions

How did large funds vote at the Las Vegas Sands Corp. meeting?

891 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the meeting of 9 May 2024. On say-on-pay, 592 of 845 voted against management (70.1%). The family table lists each of the largest families item by item.

Is this the meeting result?

No. These are the votes of funds and managers that file Form N-PX, counted by filer and by the shares they reported. The certified result, which includes every shareholder, is reported by Las Vegas Sands Corp. on Form 8-K.

Why are director elections shown as counts only?

Director records name the nominee. This site does not publish pages or rows about individuals, so for director elections it keeps the number of nominees and the split of votes and discards the wording.

Every meeting on file for Las Vegas Sands Corp.

Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings listing Las Vegas Sands Corp. with a meeting date within three days of 9 May 2024. Proposal titles are the most common wording among filers and are replaced by the SEC category where a wording could name a person. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 23 Sep 2026.