Home / Companies / Lightspeed Commerce Inc. / 3 Aug 2023
Lightspeed Commerce Inc.: meeting of 3 Aug 2023
Votes reported on Form N-PX, item by item
82 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the Lightspeed Commerce Inc. meeting of 3 Aug 2023. Their records fall into 5 items below, in ballot order: management items first, then proposals from security holders. Each bar shows how the reporting filers split; it is not the result of the meeting.
foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management
Items
DIRECTOR ELECTIONSIssuer
Director elections
7 nominees; 90.7% of reported votes for; 19 filers withheld from or voted against at least one nominee.
385 vote records from 37 filers. 0 of the 36 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 1 filer reported this item without a management mark.
SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESIssuer
Advisory vote on executive pay (say-on-pay)
62 vote records from 53 filers. 8 of the 49 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 4 filers reported this item without a management mark.
AUDIT-RELATEDIssuer
Audit-related items (auditor ratification)
55 vote records from 37 filers. 0 of the 36 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 1 filer reported this item without a management mark.
COMPENSATIONIssuer
COMPENSATION: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
113 vote records from 40 filers. 6 of the 39 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 1 filer reported this item without a management mark.
OTHERIssuer
OTHER: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
3 vote records from 3 filers. No filer marked a management recommendation, so no against-management figure is reported. 3 filers reported this item without a management mark.
How the largest families voted
| Family | 1. Directors | 2. Say-on-pay | 3. Auditor |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vanguard | For | For | For |
| BlackRock and iShares | For | No report | For |
| Fidelity | For | No report | For |
| Dimensional | For | No report | For |
| State Street and SPDR | For | No report | For |
| American Century | For | No report | For |
| Invesco | For | No report | For |
| Charles Schwab | For | For | For |
| Nuveen and TIAA | For | No report | For |
| John Hancock and Manulife | For | For | For |
| J.P. Morgan | No report | For | No report |
| Goldman Sachs | No report | Split or no vote | No report |
| Jackson National funds | For | For | For |
| Northern Trust and FlexShares | For | For | For |
| Lincoln Financial | For | No report | For |
| Nationwide | For | For | For |
| Brighthouse Funds | For | No report | For |
| PIMCO | For | No report | For |
| Natixis and Loomis Sayles | No report | For | No report |
| Artisan Partners | For | No report | For |
* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.
Questions
How did large funds vote at the Lightspeed Commerce Inc. meeting?
82 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the meeting of 3 Aug 2023. On say-on-pay, 8 of 49 voted against management (16.3%). The family table lists each of the largest families item by item.
Is this the meeting result?
No. These are the votes of funds and managers that file Form N-PX, counted by filer and by the shares they reported. The certified result, which includes every shareholder, is reported by Lightspeed Commerce Inc. on Form 8-K.
Why are director elections shown as counts only?
Director records name the nominee. This site does not publish pages or rows about individuals, so for director elections it keeps the number of nominees and the split of votes and discards the wording.
Every meeting on file for Lightspeed Commerce Inc.
Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings listing Lightspeed Commerce Inc. with a meeting date within three days of 3 Aug 2023. Proposal titles are the most common wording among filers and are replaced by the SEC category where a wording could name a person. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 23 Sep 2026.