Home / Companies / Lightspeed Commerce Inc. / 31 Jul 2025
Lightspeed Commerce Inc.: meeting of 31 Jul 2025
Votes reported on Form N-PX, item by item
61 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the Lightspeed Commerce Inc. meeting of 31 Jul 2025. Their records fall into 5 items below, in ballot order: management items first, then proposals from security holders. Each bar shows how the reporting filers split; it is not the result of the meeting.
foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management
Items
DIRECTOR ELECTIONSIssuer
Director elections
7 nominees; 100.0% of reported votes for; no filer withheld from or voted against at least one nominee.
294 vote records from 24 filers. 0 of the 24 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESIssuer
Advisory vote on executive pay (say-on-pay)
92 vote records from 41 filers. 0 of the 38 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 3 filers reported this item without a management mark.
AUDIT-RELATEDIssuer
Audit-related items (auditor ratification)
42 vote records from 24 filers. 0 of the 24 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
COMPENSATIONIssuer
COMPENSATION: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
34 vote records from 20 filers. 0 of the 20 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
OTHERIssuer
OTHER: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
30 vote records from 3 filers. No filer marked a management recommendation, so no against-management figure is reported. 3 filers reported this item without a management mark.
How the largest families voted
| Family | 1. Directors | 2. Say-on-pay | 3. Auditor |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vanguard | For | No report | For |
| BlackRock and iShares | For | For | For |
| Fidelity | For | No report | For |
| Dimensional | For | No report | For |
| State Street and SPDR | For | No report | For |
| American Century | For | No report | For |
| Invesco | For | No report | For |
| Equitable | For | No report | For |
| Charles Schwab | For | For | For |
| Nuveen and TIAA | For | No report | For |
| John Hancock and Manulife | For | For | For |
| Northern Trust and FlexShares | For | For | For |
| Lincoln Financial | For | No report | For |
| Brighthouse Funds | For | No report | For |
| Columbia Threadneedle | For | No report | For |
| Natixis and Loomis Sayles | No report | For | No report |
* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.
Questions
How did large funds vote at the Lightspeed Commerce Inc. meeting?
61 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the meeting of 31 Jul 2025. On say-on-pay, 0 of 38 voted against management (0.0%). The family table lists each of the largest families item by item.
Is this the meeting result?
No. These are the votes of funds and managers that file Form N-PX, counted by filer and by the shares they reported. The certified result, which includes every shareholder, is reported by Lightspeed Commerce Inc. on Form 8-K.
Why are director elections shown as counts only?
Director records name the nominee. This site does not publish pages or rows about individuals, so for director elections it keeps the number of nominees and the split of votes and discards the wording.
Every meeting on file for Lightspeed Commerce Inc.
Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings listing Lightspeed Commerce Inc. with a meeting date within three days of 31 Jul 2025. Proposal titles are the most common wording among filers and are replaced by the SEC category where a wording could name a person. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 23 Sep 2026.