Vote Scores

Home / Companies / Marathon Petroleum Corporation / 30 Apr 2025

Meeting · year to 30 June 20251,355 filers reporting

Marathon Petroleum Corporation: meeting of 30 Apr 2025

Votes reported on Form N-PX, item by item

1,355 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the Marathon Petroleum Corporation meeting of 30 Apr 2025. Their records fall into 8 items below, in ballot order: management items first, then proposals from security holders. Each bar shows how the reporting filers split; it is not the result of the meeting.

foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management

Items

1

DIRECTOR ELECTIONSIssuer

Director elections

4 nominees; 93.2% of reported votes for; 61 filers withheld from or voted against at least one nominee.

3,141 vote records from 322 filers. 8 of the 320 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 2 filers reported this item without a management mark.

95.7% for2.2% against2.2% other2.5% against management322 filers
2

SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESIssuer

Advisory vote on executive pay (say-on-pay)

2,035 vote records from 1,334 filers. 109 of the 1,297 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 37 filers reported this item without a management mark.

88.5% for8.2% against3.3% other8.4% against management1,334 filers95.3% for4.6% against0.1% other4.6% against management228,227,981 reported shares
3

AUDIT-RELATEDIssuer

Audit-related items (auditor ratification)

789 vote records from 322 filers. 7 of the 320 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 2 filers reported this item without a management mark.

96.9% for1.9% against1.2% other2.2% against management322 filers99.9% for0.1% against0.0% other0.1% against management97,184,298 reported shares
4

SHAREHOLDER RIGHTS AND DEFENSESIssuer

SHAREHOLDER RIGHTS AND DEFENSES: management items

Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.

945 vote records from 311 filers. 1 of the 309 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 2 filers reported this item without a management mark.

98.4% for0.6% against1.0% other0.3% against management311 filers99.7% for0.2% against0.1% other0.1% against management120,473,122 reported shares, counted once per item in this group
5

COMPENSATIONIssuer

COMPENSATION: management items

Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.

42 vote records from 18 filers. 1 of the 18 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.

88.9% for0.0% against11.1% other5.6% against management18 filers100.0% for0.0% against0.0% other0.0% against management316,011 reported shares, counted once per item in this group
6

CORPORATE GOVERNANCEIssuer

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE: management items

Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.

645 vote records from 272 filers. 1 of the 270 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 2 filers reported this item without a management mark.

98.2% for0.4% against1.5% other0.4% against management272 filers99.9% for0.1% against0.0% other0.1% against management74,212,292 reported shares, counted once per item in this group
7

CORPORATE GOVERNANCESecurity holder

Shareholder proposal to support a simple majority vote.

755 vote records from 308 filers. 196 of the 308 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.

63.0% for36.4% against0.6% other63.6% against management308 filers38.1% for61.8% against0.1% other38.2% against management96,808,561 reported shares
8

Several categoriesSecurity holder

Shareholder proposals (not separable from the filings)

Filers described these proposals in wordings that could not be matched to one another, so they are shown together.

1 vote records from 1 filers. 1 of the 1 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.

0.0% for100.0% against100.0% against management1 filers0.0% for100.0% against100.0% against management1,000 reported shares, counted once per item in this group

How the largest families voted

Family1. Directors2. Say-on-pay3. Auditor7. Proposal
VanguardForForForAgainst
BlackRock and iSharesForForForAgainst
FidelityForForForFor *
DimensionalForForForFor *
State Street and SPDRForForForAgainst
American CenturyForForForFor *
Franklin TempletonForForForFor *
InvescoForForForFor *
EquitableForForForFor *
Charles SchwabForForForAgainst
Nuveen and TIAAForForForFor *
ProShares and ProFundsForForForFor *
John Hancock and ManulifeForForForFor *
Morgan Stanley, Eaton Vance and CalvertForForForFor *
J.P. MorganForForForAgainst
Goldman SachsForForForFor *
WisdomTreeForAgainst *ForFor *
PGIM and PrudentialForForForAgainst
Jackson National fundsForForForFor *
Northern Trust and FlexSharesForForForFor *
SEIForForForAgainst
T. Rowe PriceForForForAgainst
ThriventForForForFor *
Lincoln FinancialForForForAgainst
VoyaForForForFor *
First TrustForForForFor *
Russell InvestmentsForForForAgainst
NationwideForForForFor *
Victory CapitalForForForFor *
Brighthouse FundsForForForFor *
Guggenheim and RydexForForForFor *
Columbia ThreadneedleForForForFor *
BNY MellonForForForFor *
PrincipalForForForFor *
Capital Group and American FundsNo reportSplit or no voteNo reportNo report
Pacific Life fundsForForForAgainst
Global XForForForNo report
MFSForForForFor *
TransamericaForForForAgainst
Federated HermesForForForAgainst
AllianceBernsteinForForForFor *
Hartford FundsForForForFor *
DWSForForForFor *
PIMCOForForForFor *
AllspringForForForFor *
MassMutualForForForFor *
Harbor FundsForForForAgainst
VanEckForForForAgainst
Macquarie and Delaware FundsForForForFor *
Janus HendersonForForForFor *
Neuberger BermanNo reportForNo reportNo report
Natixis and Loomis SaylesForForForFor *
Lord AbbettForForForFor *
BairdNo reportForNo reportNo report

* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.

Questions

How did large funds vote at the Marathon Petroleum Corporation meeting?

1,355 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the meeting of 30 Apr 2025. On say-on-pay, 109 of 1,297 voted against management (8.4%). One proposal from security holders could be told apart in the filings. The family table lists each of the largest families item by item.

Is this the meeting result?

No. These are the votes of funds and managers that file Form N-PX, counted by filer and by the shares they reported. The certified result, which includes every shareholder, is reported by Marathon Petroleum Corporation on Form 8-K.

Why are director elections shown as counts only?

Director records name the nominee. This site does not publish pages or rows about individuals, so for director elections it keeps the number of nominees and the split of votes and discards the wording.

Every meeting on file for Marathon Petroleum Corporation

Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings listing Marathon Petroleum Corporation with a meeting date within three days of 30 Apr 2025. Proposal titles are the most common wording among filers and are replaced by the SEC category where a wording could name a person. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 23 Sep 2026.