Home / Companies / MasTec, Inc. / 14 May 2024
MasTec, Inc.: meeting of 14 May 2024
Votes reported on Form N-PX, item by item
529 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the MasTec, Inc. meeting of 14 May 2024. Their records fall into 6 items below, in ballot order: management items first, then proposals from security holders. Each bar shows how the reporting filers split; it is not the result of the meeting.
foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management
Items
DIRECTOR ELECTIONSIssuer
Director elections
2 nominees; 83.8% of reported votes for; 56 filers withheld from or voted against at least one nominee.
638 vote records from 164 filers. 4 of the 161 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 3 filers reported this item without a management mark.
SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESIssuer
Advisory vote on executive pay (say-on-pay)
763 vote records from 519 filers. 153 of the 496 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 23 filers reported this item without a management mark.
One filer reported a share count too large to be the holding described. No share split is published for this item. How that is decided
AUDIT-RELATEDIssuer
Audit-related items (auditor ratification)
316 vote records from 161 filers. 1 of the 158 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 3 filers reported this item without a management mark.
0 filers reported share counts too large to be the holding described. No share split is published for this item. How that is decided
CAPITAL STRUCTUREIssuer
CAPITAL STRUCTURE: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
48 vote records from 25 filers. 0 of the 24 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 1 filer reported this item without a management mark.
COMPENSATIONIssuer
COMPENSATION: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
594 vote records from 167 filers. 4 of the 164 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 3 filers reported this item without a management mark.
Several categoriesSecurity holder
Shareholder proposals (not separable from the filings)
Filers described these proposals in wordings that could not be matched to one another, so they are shown together.
4 vote records from 1 filers. 0 of the 1 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
How the largest families voted
| Family | 1. Directors | 2. Say-on-pay | 3. Auditor |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vanguard | For | For | For |
| BlackRock and iShares | For | For | For |
| Fidelity | For | For | For |
| Dimensional | For | Against * | For |
| State Street and SPDR | For | For | For |
| American Century | For | Against * | For |
| Franklin Templeton | For | For | For |
| Invesco | Split or no vote | For | For |
| Equitable | For | For | For |
| Charles Schwab | For | For | For |
| Nuveen and TIAA | Split or no vote | For | For |
| ProShares and ProFunds | For | For | For |
| John Hancock and Manulife | For | For | For |
| Morgan Stanley, Eaton Vance and Calvert | For | Against * | For |
| J.P. Morgan | For | For | For |
| Goldman Sachs | Split or no vote | For | For |
| PGIM and Prudential | For | Against * | For |
| Jackson National funds | For | Against * | For |
| Northern Trust and FlexShares | For | For | For |
| SEI | For | Against * | For |
| T. Rowe Price | For | For | For |
| Thrivent | For | For | For |
| Lincoln Financial | For | For | For |
| Voya | Split or no vote | For | For |
| First Trust | For | For | For |
| Russell Investments | For | Against * | For |
| Nationwide | For | For | For |
| Victory Capital | For | For | For |
| Brighthouse Funds | For | For | For |
| Guggenheim and Rydex | For | For | For |
| Columbia Threadneedle | Split or no vote | Against * | For |
| BNY Mellon | Split or no vote | Against * | For |
| Principal | For | For | For |
| Pacific Life funds | For | For | For |
| Global X | For | Against * | For |
| Transamerica | For | For | For |
| Federated Hermes | No report | Against * | No report |
| AllianceBernstein | Split or no vote | For | For |
| DWS | For | For | For |
| Allspring | For | For | For |
| MassMutual | For | Against * | For |
| Macquarie and Delaware Funds | Split or no vote | For | For |
| Janus Henderson | No report | For | No report |
| Neuberger Berman | No report | Against * | No report |
| Natixis and Loomis Sayles | No report | Against * | No report |
| Baird | No report | For | No report |
* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.
Questions
How did large funds vote at the MasTec, Inc. meeting?
529 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the meeting of 14 May 2024. On say-on-pay, 153 of 496 voted against management (30.8%). The family table lists each of the largest families item by item.
Is this the meeting result?
No. These are the votes of funds and managers that file Form N-PX, counted by filer and by the shares they reported. The certified result, which includes every shareholder, is reported by MasTec, Inc. on Form 8-K.
Why are director elections shown as counts only?
Director records name the nominee. This site does not publish pages or rows about individuals, so for director elections it keeps the number of nominees and the split of votes and discards the wording.
Every meeting on file for MasTec, Inc.
Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings listing MasTec, Inc. with a meeting date within three days of 14 May 2024. Proposal titles are the most common wording among filers and are replaced by the SEC category where a wording could name a person. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 23 Sep 2026.