Home / Companies / Ouster, Inc. / 17 Jun 2026
Ouster, Inc.: meeting of 17 Jun 2026
Votes reported on Form N-PX, item by item
353 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the Ouster, Inc. meeting of 17 Jun 2026. Their records fall into 5 items below, in ballot order: management items first, then proposals from security holders. Each bar shows how the reporting filers split; it is not the result of the meeting.
foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management
Items
DIRECTOR ELECTIONSIssuer
Director elections
2 nominees; 78.7% of reported votes for; 37 filers withheld from or voted against at least one nominee.
381 vote records from 100 filers. 5 of the 99 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 1 filer reported this item without a management mark.
SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESIssuer
Advisory vote on executive pay (say-on-pay)
487 vote records from 351 filers. 140 of the 331 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 20 filers reported this item without a management mark.
AUDIT-RELATEDIssuer
Audit-related items (auditor ratification)
180 vote records from 99 filers. 1 of the 98 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 1 filer reported this item without a management mark.
CAPITAL STRUCTUREIssuer
CAPITAL STRUCTURE: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
180 vote records from 99 filers. 2 of the 98 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 1 filer reported this item without a management mark.
CORPORATE GOVERNANCEIssuer
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
162 vote records from 94 filers. 10 of the 93 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 1 filer reported this item without a management mark.
How the largest families voted
| Family | 1. Directors | 2. Say-on-pay | 3. Auditor |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vanguard | For | For | For |
| BlackRock and iShares | For | For | For |
| Fidelity | For | Against * | For |
| Dimensional | Abstain or withhold * | Against * | For |
| State Street and SPDR | For | For | For |
| Franklin Templeton | For | Against * | For |
| Invesco | For | Against * | For |
| Equitable | For | For | For |
| Charles Schwab | For | For | For |
| Nuveen and TIAA | For | For | For |
| ProShares and ProFunds | Split or no vote | Against * | For |
| John Hancock and Manulife | Split or no vote | Against * | For |
| Morgan Stanley, Eaton Vance and Calvert | Split or no vote | Against * | For |
| J.P. Morgan | For | For | For |
| Goldman Sachs | For | For | For |
| PGIM and Prudential | Abstain or withhold * | For | For |
| Jackson National funds | Abstain or withhold * | Against * | For |
| Northern Trust and FlexShares | For | Against * | For |
| SEI | For | For | For |
| T. Rowe Price | For | Against * | For |
| Lincoln Financial | For | For | For |
| Voya | Split or no vote | For | For |
| First Trust | Split or no vote | Against * | For |
| Russell Investments | For | For | For |
| Nationwide | For | For | For |
| Victory Capital | Split or no vote | Against * | For |
| Brighthouse Funds | Split or no vote | Against | For |
| Guggenheim and Rydex | Split or no vote | Against * | For |
| Columbia Threadneedle | For | Against * | For |
| BNY Mellon | No report | Against * | No report |
| Principal | Split or no vote | Against * | For |
| Pacific Life funds | For | For | For |
| Global X | For | For | For |
| AllianceBernstein | No report | Against * | No report |
| DWS | Split or no vote | Against * | For |
| Allspring | Split or no vote | Against * | For |
| VanEck | For | For | For |
| Janus Henderson | Split or no vote | Against * | For |
| Neuberger Berman | No report | For | No report |
| Natixis and Loomis Sayles | No report | Against * | No report |
| Lord Abbett | For | For | For |
| Baird | No report | Against * | No report |
* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.
Questions
How did large funds vote at the Ouster, Inc. meeting?
353 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the meeting of 17 Jun 2026. On say-on-pay, 140 of 331 voted against management (42.3%). The family table lists each of the largest families item by item.
Is this the meeting result?
No. These are the votes of funds and managers that file Form N-PX, counted by filer and by the shares they reported. The certified result, which includes every shareholder, is reported by Ouster, Inc. on Form 8-K.
Why are director elections shown as counts only?
Director records name the nominee. This site does not publish pages or rows about individuals, so for director elections it keeps the number of nominees and the split of votes and discards the wording.
Every meeting on file for Ouster, Inc.
Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings listing Ouster, Inc. with a meeting date within three days of 17 Jun 2026. Proposal titles are the most common wording among filers and are replaced by the SEC category where a wording could name a person. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 23 Sep 2026.