Home / Companies / Paycom Software, Inc. / 4 May 2026
Paycom Software, Inc.: meeting of 4 May 2026
Votes reported on Form N-PX, item by item
781 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the Paycom Software, Inc. meeting of 4 May 2026. Their records fall into 4 items below, in ballot order: management items first, then proposals from security holders. Each bar shows how the reporting filers split; it is not the result of the meeting.
foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management
Items
DIRECTOR ELECTIONSIssuer
Director elections
2 nominees; 43.4% of reported votes for; 152 filers withheld from or voted against at least one nominee.
1,047 vote records from 208 filers. 101 of the 203 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 5 filers reported this item without a management mark.
SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESIssuer
Advisory vote on executive pay (say-on-pay)
1,226 vote records from 776 filers. 443 of the 736 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 40 filers reported this item without a management mark.
AUDIT-RELATEDIssuer
Audit-related items (auditor ratification)
524 vote records from 208 filers. 2 of the 203 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 5 filers reported this item without a management mark.
COMPENSATIONIssuer
COMPENSATION: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
15 vote records from 11 filers. 6 of the 11 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
How the largest families voted
| Family | 1. Directors | 2. Say-on-pay | 3. Auditor |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vanguard | For | For | For |
| BlackRock and iShares | For | For | For |
| Fidelity | For | For | For |
| Dimensional | Against * | Against * | For |
| State Street and SPDR | For * | For | For |
| American Century | Against * | Against * | For |
| Franklin Templeton | Against * | Against * | For |
| Invesco | Split or no vote | Against * | For |
| Equitable | Against * | Against * | For |
| Charles Schwab | For | Against * | For |
| Nuveen and TIAA | Against * | For | For |
| ProShares and ProFunds | Against * | Against * | For |
| John Hancock and Manulife | Against * | Against * | For |
| Morgan Stanley, Eaton Vance and Calvert | Against * | Against * | For |
| J.P. Morgan | Split or no vote | Against * | For |
| Goldman Sachs | For | For | For |
| WisdomTree | Against * | For | For |
| PGIM and Prudential | For | For | For |
| Jackson National funds | For | Against * | For |
| Northern Trust and FlexShares | Against * | Against * | For |
| SEI | Split or no vote | Against * | For |
| T. Rowe Price | Against * | Against * | For |
| Thrivent | Against * | Against * | For |
| Lincoln Financial | Against * | For | For |
| Voya | Split or no vote | Against * | For |
| First Trust | Against * | Against * | For |
| Russell Investments | No report | Against * | No report |
| Nationwide | For | Against * | For |
| Victory Capital | Against * | Against * | For |
| Brighthouse Funds | Against | Against | For |
| Guggenheim and Rydex | Against * | Against * | For |
| Columbia Threadneedle | Split or no vote | Against * | For |
| BNY Mellon | Against * | For | For |
| Principal | Against * | Against * | For |
| Pacific Life funds | For | For | For |
| Global X | Split or no vote | Against * | For |
| Transamerica | Against * | For | For |
| Federated Hermes | For | For | For |
| AllianceBernstein | Against * | Against * | For |
| Hartford Funds | No report | Against * | No report |
| DWS | Against * | Against * | For |
| Allspring | Split or no vote | Split or no vote | Split or no vote |
| MassMutual | Against * | For | For |
| Harbor Funds | For | For | For |
| Janus Henderson | No report | Against * | No report |
| Neuberger Berman | No report | Against * | No report |
| Natixis and Loomis Sayles | No report | Against * | No report |
| Harris Associates and Oakmark | No report | For | No report |
| Baird | No report | Against * | No report |
* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.
Questions
How did large funds vote at the Paycom Software, Inc. meeting?
781 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the meeting of 4 May 2026. On say-on-pay, 443 of 736 voted against management (60.2%). The family table lists each of the largest families item by item.
Is this the meeting result?
No. These are the votes of funds and managers that file Form N-PX, counted by filer and by the shares they reported. The certified result, which includes every shareholder, is reported by Paycom Software, Inc. on Form 8-K.
Why are director elections shown as counts only?
Director records name the nominee. This site does not publish pages or rows about individuals, so for director elections it keeps the number of nominees and the split of votes and discards the wording.
Every meeting on file for Paycom Software, Inc.
Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings listing Paycom Software, Inc. with a meeting date within three days of 4 May 2026. Proposal titles are the most common wording among filers and are replaced by the SEC category where a wording could name a person. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 23 Sep 2026.