Home / Companies / PEMBINA PIPELINE CORPORATION / 10 May 2024
PEMBINA PIPELINE CORPORATION: meeting of 10 May 2024
Votes reported on Form N-PX, item by item
309 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the PEMBINA PIPELINE CORPORATION meeting of 10 May 2024. Their records fall into 6 items below, in ballot order: management items first, then proposals from security holders. Each bar shows how the reporting filers split; it is not the result of the meeting.
foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management
Items
DIRECTOR ELECTIONSIssuer
Director elections
11 nominees; 98.4% of reported votes for; 9 filers withheld from or voted against at least one nominee.
2,422 vote records from 143 filers. 0 of the 143 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESIssuer
Advisory vote on executive pay (say-on-pay)
212 vote records from 183 filers. 8 of the 172 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 11 filers reported this item without a management mark.
AUDIT-RELATEDIssuer
Audit-related items (auditor ratification)
222 vote records from 143 filers. 3 of the 143 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
COMPENSATIONIssuer
COMPENSATION: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
209 vote records from 123 filers. 1 of the 123 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
OTHERIssuer
OTHER: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
35 vote records from 8 filers. 0 of the 1 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 7 filers reported this item without a management mark.
Several categoriesSecurity holder
Shareholder proposals (not separable from the filings)
Filers described these proposals in wordings that could not be matched to one another, so they are shown together.
1 vote records from 1 filers. 0 of the 1 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
How the largest families voted
| Family | 1. Directors | 2. Say-on-pay | 3. Auditor |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vanguard | For | No report | For |
| BlackRock and iShares | For | No report | For |
| Fidelity | For | No report | For |
| Dimensional | For | No report | For |
| State Street and SPDR | For | No report | For |
| American Century | For | No report | For |
| Franklin Templeton | For | No report | For |
| Invesco | For | No report | For |
| Charles Schwab | For | No report | For |
| Nuveen and TIAA | For | No report | For |
| ProShares and ProFunds | For | No report | For |
| John Hancock and Manulife | For | For | For |
| Morgan Stanley, Eaton Vance and Calvert | For | No report | For |
| J.P. Morgan | For | For | For |
| Goldman Sachs | For | Split or no vote | For |
| WisdomTree | For | No report | For |
| PGIM and Prudential | For | No report | For |
| Jackson National funds | For | For | For |
| Northern Trust and FlexShares | For | For | For |
| SEI | For | No report | For |
| Lincoln Financial | For | No report | For |
| Voya | For | No report | For |
| First Trust | For | No report | For |
| Russell Investments | For | No report | For |
| Victory Capital | For | No report | For |
| Guggenheim and Rydex | For | No report | For |
| BNY Mellon | For | No report | For |
| Principal | For | No report | For |
| Capital Group and American Funds | For | No report | For |
| Pacific Life funds | For | No report | For |
| Global X | For | No report | For |
| Transamerica | For | No report | For |
| Federated Hermes | For | No report | For |
| AllianceBernstein | For | No report | For |
| Hartford Funds | For | No report | For |
| DWS | For | No report | For |
| Allspring | For | No report | For |
| MassMutual | No report | For | No report |
| Virtus | For | No report | For |
| VanEck | For | No report | For |
| Macquarie and Delaware Funds | For | No report | For |
| Neuberger Berman | For | No report | For |
| Natixis and Loomis Sayles | No report | For | No report |
| Lord Abbett | For | No report | For |
| Cohen & Steers | For | For | For |
| Baird | No report | For | No report |
* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.
Questions
How did large funds vote at the PEMBINA PIPELINE CORPORATION meeting?
309 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the meeting of 10 May 2024. On say-on-pay, 8 of 172 voted against management (4.7%). The family table lists each of the largest families item by item.
Is this the meeting result?
No. These are the votes of funds and managers that file Form N-PX, counted by filer and by the shares they reported. The certified result, which includes every shareholder, is reported by PEMBINA PIPELINE CORPORATION on Form 8-K.
Why are director elections shown as counts only?
Director records name the nominee. This site does not publish pages or rows about individuals, so for director elections it keeps the number of nominees and the split of votes and discards the wording.
Every meeting on file for PEMBINA PIPELINE CORPORATION
Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings listing PEMBINA PIPELINE CORPORATION with a meeting date within three days of 10 May 2024. Proposal titles are the most common wording among filers and are replaced by the SEC category where a wording could name a person. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 23 Sep 2026.