Vote Scores

Home / Companies / Post Holdings, Inc. / 30 Jan 2025

Meeting · year to 30 June 2025559 filers reporting

Post Holdings, Inc.: meeting of 30 Jan 2025

Votes reported on Form N-PX, item by item

559 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the Post Holdings, Inc. meeting of 30 Jan 2025. Their records fall into 9 items below, in ballot order: management items first, then proposals from security holders. Each bar shows how the reporting filers split; it is not the result of the meeting.

foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management

Items

1

DIRECTOR ELECTIONSIssuer

Director elections

8 nominees; 93.3% of reported votes for; 49 filers withheld from or voted against at least one nominee.

3,026 vote records from 171 filers. 1 of the 170 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 1 filer reported this item without a management mark.

98.2% for0.0% against1.8% other0.6% against management171 filers
2

SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESIssuer

Advisory vote on executive pay (say-on-pay)

832 vote records from 553 filers. 315 of the 535 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 18 filers reported this item without a management mark.

39.1% for57.5% against3.4% other58.9% against management553 filers69.0% for31.0% against0.0% other30.9% against management53,880,223 reported shares
3

SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESIssuer

Frequency of the say-on-pay vote

1: 3 filers; one year: 499 filers; three years: 11 filers; for: 5 filers; two years: 3 filers; abstain: 3 filers.

819 vote records from 543 filers. 16 of the 521 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 22 filers reported this item without a management mark.

0.9% for0.0% against99.1% other3.1% against management543 filers0.2% for0.2% against99.6% other14.2% against management53,940,533 reported shares
4

AUDIT-RELATEDIssuer

Audit-related items (auditor ratification)

378 vote records from 171 filers. 3 of the 170 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 1 filer reported this item without a management mark.

98.2% for1.2% against0.6% other1.8% against management171 filers100.0% for0.0% against0.0% other0.0% against management23,685,345 reported shares
5

SHAREHOLDER RIGHTS AND DEFENSESIssuer

SHAREHOLDER RIGHTS AND DEFENSES: management items

Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.

87 vote records from 33 filers. 11 of the 32 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 1 filer reported this item without a management mark.

66.7% for33.3% against34.4% against management33 filers83.1% for16.9% against21.5% against management3,108,336 reported shares, counted once per item in this group
6

COMPENSATIONIssuer

COMPENSATION: management items

Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.

392 vote records from 177 filers. 7 of the 175 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 2 filers reported this item without a management mark.

93.8% for3.4% against2.8% other4.0% against management177 filers99.8% for0.2% against0.1% other0.2% against management23,742,512 reported shares, counted once per item in this group
7

CORPORATE GOVERNANCEIssuer

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE: management items

Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.

309 vote records from 142 filers. 10 of the 142 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.

92.3% for4.2% against3.5% other7.0% against management142 filers94.1% for1.3% against4.6% other5.6% against management20,772,842 reported shares, counted once per item in this group
8

CORPORATE GOVERNANCESecurity holder

Shareholder proposal: CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

367 vote records from 167 filers. 37 of the 165 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 2 filers reported this item without a management mark.

19.8% for79.0% against1.2% other22.4% against management167 filers17.5% for82.4% against0.1% other17.7% against management23,563,379 reported shares
9

CORPORATE GOVERNANCESecurity holder

Shareholder proposal to eliminate all supermajority voting requirements.

367 vote records from 167 filers. 136 of the 165 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 2 filers reported this item without a management mark.

81.4% for17.4% against1.2% other82.4% against management167 filers79.1% for20.9% against0.1% other79.3% against management23,563,379 reported shares

How the largest families voted

Family1. Directors2. Say-on-pay3. Pay-vote frequency4. Auditor8. Proposal9. Proposal
VanguardForForSplit or no voteForAgainstFor *
BlackRock and iSharesForAgainst *Split or no voteForAgainstFor *
FidelityForAgainst *Split or no voteForAgainstFor *
DimensionalForAgainst *Split or no vote *ForFor *For *
State Street and SPDRForForSplit or no voteForAgainstAgainst
American CenturyForAgainst *Split or no voteForAgainstFor *
Franklin TempletonNo reportAgainst *Split or no voteNo reportNo reportNo report
InvescoForAgainst *Split or no voteForAgainstFor *
EquitableForForSplit or no voteForAgainstFor *
Charles SchwabForAgainst *Split or no voteForFor *For *
Nuveen and TIAAForForSplit or no voteForAgainstAgainst
ProShares and ProFundsForAgainst *Split or no voteForAgainstFor *
John Hancock and ManulifeForForSplit or no voteForAgainstFor *
Morgan Stanley, Eaton Vance and CalvertForAgainst *Split or no voteForAgainstFor *
J.P. MorganForForSplit or no voteForAgainstAgainst
Goldman SachsForAgainst *Split or no voteForAgainstFor *
WisdomTreeForForSplit or no voteForAgainstFor *
PGIM and PrudentialForForSplit or no voteForAgainstFor *
Jackson National fundsForAgainst *Split or no voteForAgainstFor *
Northern Trust and FlexSharesForForSplit or no voteForAgainstFor *
SEIForAgainst *Split or no voteForFor *For *
T. Rowe PriceForForSplit or no voteForAgainstFor *
ThriventForAgainst *Split or no voteForAgainstFor *
Lincoln FinancialForForSplit or no voteForAgainst *Against *
VoyaForAgainst *Split or no voteForAgainstFor *
First TrustForAgainst *Split or no voteForAgainstFor *
Russell InvestmentsForAgainst *Split or no voteForFor *For *
NationwideForAgainst *Split or no voteForAgainstFor *
Victory CapitalForAgainst *Split or no voteForAgainstFor *
Brighthouse FundsForAgainst *Split or no voteForAgainstFor *
Guggenheim and RydexForAgainst *Split or no voteForAgainstFor *
Columbia ThreadneedleForAgainst *Split or no voteForAgainstFor *
BNY MellonForForSplit or no voteForAgainstFor *
PrincipalForAgainst *Split or no voteForAgainstFor *
Pacific Life fundsForForSplit or no voteForAgainstAgainst
Global XForAgainst *Split or no voteForNo reportNo report
TransamericaForForSplit or no voteForAgainstFor *
Federated HermesForAgainst *Split or no voteForFor *For *
AllianceBernsteinNo reportAgainst *Split or no voteNo reportNo reportNo report
DWSForAgainst *Split or no voteForAgainstFor *
PIMCOForAgainst *Split or no voteForAgainstFor *
AllspringNo reportAgainst *Split or no voteNo reportNo reportNo report
MassMutualForForSplit or no voteForAgainstFor *
VirtusForAgainst *Split or no voteForAgainstFor *
Neuberger BermanNo reportAgainst *Split or no voteNo reportNo reportNo report
Natixis and Loomis SaylesForForSplit or no voteForFor *For *
BairdNo reportAgainst *Split or no voteNo reportNo reportNo report

* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.

Questions

How did large funds vote at the Post Holdings, Inc. meeting?

559 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the meeting of 30 Jan 2025. On say-on-pay, 315 of 535 voted against management (58.9%). 2 proposals from security holders could be told apart in the filings. The family table lists each of the largest families item by item.

Is this the meeting result?

No. These are the votes of funds and managers that file Form N-PX, counted by filer and by the shares they reported. The certified result, which includes every shareholder, is reported by Post Holdings, Inc. on Form 8-K.

Why are director elections shown as counts only?

Director records name the nominee. This site does not publish pages or rows about individuals, so for director elections it keeps the number of nominees and the split of votes and discards the wording.

Every meeting on file for Post Holdings, Inc.

Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings listing Post Holdings, Inc. with a meeting date within three days of 30 Jan 2025. Proposal titles are the most common wording among filers and are replaced by the SEC category where a wording could name a person. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 23 Sep 2026.