Home / Companies / Premium Brands Holdings Corporation / 6 May 2026
Premium Brands Holdings Corporation: meeting of 6 May 2026
Votes reported on Form N-PX, item by item
64 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the Premium Brands Holdings Corporation meeting of 6 May 2026. Their records fall into 8 items below, in ballot order: management items first, then proposals from security holders. Each bar shows how the reporting filers split; it is not the result of the meeting.
foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management
Items
DIRECTOR ELECTIONSIssuer
Director elections
8 nominees; 99.8% of reported votes for; one filer withheld from or voted against at least one nominee.
432 vote records from 39 filers. 0 of the 39 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESIssuer
Advisory vote on executive pay (say-on-pay)
78 vote records from 33 filers. 1 of the 29 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 4 filers reported this item without a management mark.
AUDIT-RELATEDIssuer
Audit-related items (auditor ratification)
61 vote records from 39 filers. 0 of the 39 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
COMPENSATIONIssuer
COMPENSATION: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
40 vote records from 30 filers. 0 of the 30 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
CORPORATE GOVERNANCEIssuer
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
47 vote records from 33 filers. 0 of the 33 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
CORPORATE GOVERNANCESecurity holder
Adopt and Disclose Policy to Review and Disclose Findings for Directors With Low Vote Support
55 vote records from 40 filers. 4 of the 40 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
CORPORATE GOVERNANCESecurity holder
Please note that this resolution is a shareholder proposal: adopt and disclose policy to regularly...
53 vote records from 38 filers. 0 of the 38 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
Several categoriesSecurity holder
Shareholder proposals (not separable from the filings)
Filers described these proposals in wordings that could not be matched to one another, so they are shown together.
9 vote records from 3 filers. 0 of the 3 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
How the largest families voted
| Family | 1. Directors | 2. Say-on-pay | 3. Auditor | 6. Proposal | 7. Proposal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vanguard | For | No report | For | Against | Against |
| BlackRock and iShares | For | For | For | Against | Against |
| Fidelity | For | No report | For | Against | Against |
| Dimensional | For | No report | For | Against | Against |
| State Street and SPDR | For | No report | For | Against | Against |
| American Century | For | No report | For | Against | Against |
| Franklin Templeton | For | No report | For | Against | Against |
| Invesco | For | No report | For | Against | Against |
| Equitable | For | No report | For | Against | Against |
| Charles Schwab | For | For | For | For * | Against |
| Nuveen and TIAA | For | No report | For | Against | Against |
| John Hancock and Manulife | For | For | For | Against | Against |
| Goldman Sachs | For | No report | For | Against | Against |
| Jackson National funds | For | For | For | Against | No report |
| Northern Trust and FlexShares | For | For | For | Against | Against |
| Lincoln Financial | For | No report | For | Against | Against |
| Brighthouse Funds | For | No report | For | Against | Against |
| PIMCO | For | No report | For | Against | Against |
| Janus Henderson | For | No report | For | Against | Against |
* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.
Questions
How did large funds vote at the Premium Brands Holdings Corporation meeting?
64 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the meeting of 6 May 2026. On say-on-pay, 1 of 29 voted against management (3.4%). 2 proposals from security holders could be told apart in the filings. The family table lists each of the largest families item by item.
Is this the meeting result?
No. These are the votes of funds and managers that file Form N-PX, counted by filer and by the shares they reported. The certified result, which includes every shareholder, is reported by Premium Brands Holdings Corporation on Form 8-K.
Why are director elections shown as counts only?
Director records name the nominee. This site does not publish pages or rows about individuals, so for director elections it keeps the number of nominees and the split of votes and discards the wording.
Every meeting on file for Premium Brands Holdings Corporation
Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings listing Premium Brands Holdings Corporation with a meeting date within three days of 6 May 2026. Proposal titles are the most common wording among filers and are replaced by the SEC category where a wording could name a person. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 23 Sep 2026.