Home / Companies / Restaurant Brands International Inc. / 6 Jun 2024
Restaurant Brands International Inc.: meeting of 6 Jun 2024
Votes reported on Form N-PX, item by item
637 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the Restaurant Brands International Inc. meeting of 6 Jun 2024. Their records fall into 11 items below, in ballot order: management items first, then proposals from security holders. Each bar shows how the reporting filers split; it is not the result of the meeting.
foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management
Items
DIRECTOR ELECTIONSIssuer
Director elections
10 nominees; 97.7% of reported votes for; 19 filers withheld from or voted against at least one nominee.
2,191 vote records from 142 filers. 0 of the 142 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESIssuer
Advisory vote on executive pay (say-on-pay)
891 vote records from 634 filers. 136 of the 598 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 36 filers reported this item without a management mark.
One filer reported a share count too large to be the holding described. That figure is left out of the share split below; the count of filers includes it. How that is decided
AUDIT-RELATEDIssuer
Audit-related items (auditor ratification)
218 vote records from 141 filers. 7 of the 141 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
ENVIRONMENT OR CLIMATESecurity holder
Consider a shareholder proposal regarding reducing plastic use.
191 vote records from 122 filers. 46 of the 122 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
ENVIRONMENT OR CLIMATESecurity holder
Consider a shareholder proposal regarding water risk.
185 vote records from 117 filers. 65 of the 117 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
CORPORATE GOVERNANCESecurity holder
Require Independent Board Chairman
191 vote records from 122 filers. 52 of the 122 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
DIVERSITY, EQUITY, AND INCLUSIONSecurity holder
Consider a shareholder proposal to require report on Board oversight of diversity and senior leadership...
215 vote records from 139 filers. 10 of the 139 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
OTHER SOCIAL ISSUESSecurity holder
Please note that this resolution is a shareholder proposal: consider a shareholder proposal to require US...
170 vote records from 112 filers. 4 of the 112 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
ENVIRONMENT OR CLIMATESecurity holder
Consider a shareholder proposal regarding antibiotics.
168 vote records from 111 filers. 9 of the 111 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
OTHER SOCIAL ISSUESSecurity holder
Shareholder proposal: OTHER SOCIAL ISSUES
38 vote records from 28 filers. 12 of the 17 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 11 filers reported this item without a management mark.
Several categoriesSecurity holder
Shareholder proposals (not separable from the filings)
Filers described these proposals in wordings that could not be matched to one another, so they are shown together.
213 vote records from 39 filers. 7 of the 32 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 7 filers reported this item without a management mark.
How the largest families voted
| Family | 1. Directors | 2. Say-on-pay | 3. Auditor | 4. Proposal | 5. Proposal | 6. Proposal | 7. Proposal | 8. Proposal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vanguard | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| BlackRock and iShares | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against | No report |
| Fidelity | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Dimensional | For | Against * | For | Against | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| State Street and SPDR | For | Against * | For | Against | For * | Against | Against | Against |
| American Century | For | For | For | Against | For * | Against | Against | Against |
| Franklin Templeton | For | For | For | For * | For * | For * | For * | Against |
| Invesco | For | For | For | Against | For * | For * | Against | Against |
| Equitable | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Charles Schwab | For | For | For | Against | No report | For * | Against | No report |
| Nuveen and TIAA | For | For | For | For * | For * | Against | Against | Against |
| John Hancock and Manulife | For | For | For | No report | No report | No report | Against | No report |
| Morgan Stanley, Eaton Vance and Calvert | For | For | For | For * | For * | For * | Against | Against |
| J.P. Morgan | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Goldman Sachs | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Jackson National funds | For | Against * | For | No report | No report | No report | Against | No report |
| Northern Trust and FlexShares | For | For | For | Abstain or withhold | For * | Against | Against | Against |
| SEI | No report | Against * | No report | No report | No report | No report | No report | No report |
| T. Rowe Price | For | Against * | For | For * | For * | For * | Against | Against |
| Lincoln Financial | For | Against * | For | For * | For * | For * | Against | Against |
| Voya | For | For | For | Against | For * | Against | Against | Against |
| First Trust | For | For | For | For * | For * | Against | Against | Against |
| Russell Investments | No report | Against * | No report | No report | No report | No report | No report | No report |
| Victory Capital | For | For | For | For * | For * | For * | For * | Against |
| Guggenheim and Rydex | For | For | For | For * | For * | For * | Against | Against |
| Columbia Threadneedle | For | For | For | Against | For * | Against | Against | Against |
| BNY Mellon | For | For | Abstain or withhold * | For * | For * | For * | Against | Against |
| Principal | No report | For | No report | No report | No report | No report | No report | No report |
| Capital Group and American Funds | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Pacific Life funds | For | For | For | Against | For * | Against | Against | Against |
| MFS | No report | For | No report | No report | No report | No report | No report | No report |
| Transamerica | For | For | For | For * | For * | For * | Against | Against |
| Federated Hermes | No report | Against * | No report | No report | No report | No report | No report | No report |
| AllianceBernstein | For | For | For | Against | For * | For * | Against | Against |
| DWS | No report | For | No report | No report | No report | No report | No report | No report |
| PIMCO | For | For | Abstain or withhold * | For * | For * | For * | For * | For * |
| Allspring | For | For | For | For * | For * | For * | Against | Against |
| MassMutual | No report | For | No report | No report | No report | No report | No report | No report |
| Harbor Funds | For | For | For | No report | No report | No report | Against | No report |
| Virtus | For | For | For | For * | For * | For * | Against | Against |
| Macquarie and Delaware Funds | No report | For | No report | No report | No report | No report | No report | No report |
| Janus Henderson | No report | For | No report | No report | No report | No report | No report | No report |
| Neuberger Berman | No report | Against * | No report | No report | No report | No report | No report | No report |
| Natixis and Loomis Sayles | For | For | For | No report | No report | No report | Against | No report |
| Baird | No report | For | No report | No report | No report | No report | No report | No report |
* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.
Questions
How did large funds vote at the Restaurant Brands International Inc. meeting?
637 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the meeting of 6 Jun 2024. On say-on-pay, 136 of 598 voted against management (22.7%). 7 proposals from security holders could be told apart in the filings. The family table lists each of the largest families item by item.
Is this the meeting result?
No. These are the votes of funds and managers that file Form N-PX, counted by filer and by the shares they reported. The certified result, which includes every shareholder, is reported by Restaurant Brands International Inc. on Form 8-K.
Why are director elections shown as counts only?
Director records name the nominee. This site does not publish pages or rows about individuals, so for director elections it keeps the number of nominees and the split of votes and discards the wording.
Every meeting on file for Restaurant Brands International Inc.
Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings listing Restaurant Brands International Inc. with a meeting date within three days of 6 Jun 2024. Proposal titles are the most common wording among filers and are replaced by the SEC category where a wording could name a person. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 23 Sep 2026.