Home / Companies / Restaurant Brands International Inc. / 3 Jun 2025
Restaurant Brands International Inc.: meeting of 3 Jun 2025
Votes reported on Form N-PX, item by item
621 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the Restaurant Brands International Inc. meeting of 3 Jun 2025. Their records fall into 9 items below, in ballot order: management items first, then proposals from security holders. Each bar shows how the reporting filers split; it is not the result of the meeting.
foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management
Items
DIRECTOR ELECTIONSIssuer
Director elections
10 nominees; 97.9% of reported votes for; 24 filers withheld from or voted against at least one nominee.
1,922 vote records from 123 filers. 0 of the 121 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 2 filers reported this item without a management mark.
DIRECTOR ELECTIONSSecurity holder
Director elections (nominees put forward by security holders)
1 nominee; 0.0% of reported votes for; 9 filers withheld from or voted against at least one nominee.
18 vote records from 9 filers. 1 of the 9 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESIssuer
Advisory vote on executive pay (say-on-pay)
843 vote records from 614 filers. 46 of the 575 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 39 filers reported this item without a management mark.
AUDIT-RELATEDIssuer
Audit-related items (auditor ratification)
191 vote records from 122 filers. 0 of the 120 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 2 filers reported this item without a management mark.
ENVIRONMENT OR CLIMATESecurity holder
Shareholder Proposal Consider a shareholder proposal regarding food waste.
186 vote records from 118 filers. 24 of the 116 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 2 filers reported this item without a management mark.
OTHER SOCIAL ISSUESSecurity holder
Shareholder Proposal Consider a shareholder proposal regarding antibiotics policy.
179 vote records from 113 filers. 7 of the 111 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 2 filers reported this item without a management mark.
CORPORATE GOVERNANCESecurity holder
Please note that this resolution is a shareholder proposal: consider a shareholder proposal regarding...
171 vote records from 113 filers. 12 of the 111 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 2 filers reported this item without a management mark.
SHAREHOLDER RIGHTS AND DEFENSESSecurity holder
Shareholder Proposal Consider a shareholder proposal regarding impact of safety policies.
38 vote records from 26 filers. 7 of the 18 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 8 filers reported this item without a management mark.
Several categoriesSecurity holder
Shareholder proposals (not separable from the filings)
Filers described these proposals in wordings that could not be matched to one another, so they are shown together.
19 vote records from 10 filers. 4 of the 10 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
How the largest families voted
| Family | 1. Directors | 2. Directors | 3. Say-on-pay | 4. Auditor | 5. Proposal | 6. Proposal | 7. Proposal | 8. Proposal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vanguard | For | No report | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Abstain or withhold |
| BlackRock and iShares | For | Against | For | For | Against | Against | No report | Against |
| Fidelity | For | No report | For | For | For * | Against | Against | No report |
| Dimensional | For | No report | For | For | Against | Against | Against | No report |
| State Street and SPDR | For | No report | For | For | Against | Against | Against | No report |
| American Century | For | No report | Against * | For | Against | Against | Against | No report |
| Franklin Templeton | For | No report | For | For | Against | Against | Against | No report |
| Invesco | For | No report | For | For | Against | Against | Against | No report |
| Equitable | For | No report | For | For | Against | Against | Against | No report |
| Charles Schwab | For | No report | For | For | Against | No report | For * | Abstain or withhold |
| Nuveen and TIAA | For | No report | For | For | Against | Against | For * | No report |
| John Hancock and Manulife | For | No report | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Morgan Stanley, Eaton Vance and Calvert | For | No report | For | For | For * | Against | Against | No report |
| J.P. Morgan | For | Against | For | For | Against | Against | Split or no vote | Split or no vote |
| Goldman Sachs | For | No report | For | For | Against | Against | Against | No report |
| WisdomTree | For | No report | For | For | Against | Against | Against | No report |
| Jackson National funds | For | No report | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Northern Trust and FlexShares | For | No report | For | For | Against | For * | Against | No report |
| SEI | No report | No report | For | No report | No report | No report | No report | No report |
| T. Rowe Price | No report | No report | For | No report | No report | No report | No report | No report |
| Lincoln Financial | For | No report | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Split or no vote |
| Voya | For | No report | For | For | Against | Against | Against | No report |
| First Trust | No report | No report | For | No report | No report | No report | No report | No report |
| Russell Investments | No report | No report | For | No report | No report | No report | No report | No report |
| Victory Capital | For | No report | For | For | Against | Against | Against | No report |
| Brighthouse Funds | For | No report | No report | For | No report | No report | Against * | No report |
| Guggenheim and Rydex | For | No report | For | For | Against | Against | Against | No report |
| Columbia Threadneedle | For | No report | For | For | Against | Against | Against | No report |
| BNY Mellon | For | No report | For | For | Against | Against | Against | No report |
| Principal | No report | No report | For | No report | No report | No report | No report | No report |
| Capital Group and American Funds | For | No report | For | For | Against | Against | Against | No report |
| Pacific Life funds | For | No report | For | For | Against | Against | Against | No report |
| Global X | No report | No report | For | No report | No report | No report | No report | No report |
| MFS | No report | No report | For | No report | No report | No report | No report | No report |
| Transamerica | For | No report | For | For | For * | Against | Against | No report |
| Federated Hermes | No report | No report | For | No report | No report | No report | No report | No report |
| AllianceBernstein | For | No report | For | For | For * | Against | Against | No report |
| DWS | No report | No report | For | No report | No report | No report | No report | No report |
| PIMCO | For | No report | For | For | Against | Against | Against | No report |
| Allspring | For | No report | For | For | Against | Against | Against | No report |
| MassMutual | No report | No report | For | No report | No report | No report | No report | No report |
| Macquarie and Delaware Funds | No report | No report | For | No report | No report | No report | No report | No report |
| Janus Henderson | For | No report | For | For | Against | Against | Against | No report |
| Neuberger Berman | No report | No report | For | No report | No report | No report | No report | No report |
| Natixis and Loomis Sayles | For | No report | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Harris Associates and Oakmark | No report | No report | For | No report | No report | No report | No report | No report |
| Baird | No report | No report | For | No report | No report | No report | No report | No report |
* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.
Questions
How did large funds vote at the Restaurant Brands International Inc. meeting?
621 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the meeting of 3 Jun 2025. On say-on-pay, 46 of 575 voted against management (8.0%). 4 proposals from security holders could be told apart in the filings. The family table lists each of the largest families item by item.
Is this the meeting result?
No. These are the votes of funds and managers that file Form N-PX, counted by filer and by the shares they reported. The certified result, which includes every shareholder, is reported by Restaurant Brands International Inc. on Form 8-K.
Why are director elections shown as counts only?
Director records name the nominee. This site does not publish pages or rows about individuals, so for director elections it keeps the number of nominees and the split of votes and discards the wording.
Every meeting on file for Restaurant Brands International Inc.
Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings listing Restaurant Brands International Inc. with a meeting date within three days of 3 Jun 2025. Proposal titles are the most common wording among filers and are replaced by the SEC category where a wording could name a person. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 23 Sep 2026.